Devereux学生优势评估的收敛效度与发散效度。

Amanda B. Nickerson, Callen E. Fishman
{"title":"Devereux学生优势评估的收敛效度与发散效度。","authors":"Amanda B. Nickerson, Callen E. Fishman","doi":"10.1037/A0015147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the convergent and divergent validity of the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA; LeBuffe, Shapiro, & Naglieri, 2008). A total of 227 (n 94 teachers, n 133 parents) raters completed the DESSA, in addition to the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scales–2 (BERS–2; Epstein, 2004) and/or the Behavior Assessment System for Children–2 (BASC–2; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004). All DESSA and BERS–2 subscales and total scales completed by parents and teachers correlated significantly. DESSA subscales and BASC–2 Adaptive Skills subscales correlated significantly for both parent and teacher raters. The divergent validity of the DESSA was explored by correlating the Total Protective Factor scale and subscales with the BASC–2 Behavioral Symptoms Index and clinical subscales. The majority of correlations for the parent ratings were significantly, negatively correlated, with the exception of the Anxiety, Somatization, and Withdrawal subscales. Support for the convergent validity of the DESSA was consistent across raters (e.g., parents; teachers) and measures (e.g., BASC–2; BERS–2). Thus, these findings support the divergent validity of the DESSA.","PeriodicalId":48005,"journal":{"name":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","volume":"24 1","pages":"48-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0015147","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergent and divergent validity of the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda B. Nickerson, Callen E. Fishman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/A0015147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assessed the convergent and divergent validity of the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA; LeBuffe, Shapiro, & Naglieri, 2008). A total of 227 (n 94 teachers, n 133 parents) raters completed the DESSA, in addition to the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scales–2 (BERS–2; Epstein, 2004) and/or the Behavior Assessment System for Children–2 (BASC–2; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004). All DESSA and BERS–2 subscales and total scales completed by parents and teachers correlated significantly. DESSA subscales and BASC–2 Adaptive Skills subscales correlated significantly for both parent and teacher raters. The divergent validity of the DESSA was explored by correlating the Total Protective Factor scale and subscales with the BASC–2 Behavioral Symptoms Index and clinical subscales. The majority of correlations for the parent ratings were significantly, negatively correlated, with the exception of the Anxiety, Somatization, and Withdrawal subscales. Support for the convergent validity of the DESSA was consistent across raters (e.g., parents; teachers) and measures (e.g., BASC–2; BERS–2). Thus, these findings support the divergent validity of the DESSA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"48-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0015147\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0015147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0015147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

本研究评估了Devereux学生优势评估(DESSA;LeBuffe, Shapiro, & Naglieri, 2008)。共有227名评分者(94名教师,133名家长)完成了DESSA,以及行为和情绪评定量表- 2 (BERS-2;Epstein, 2004)和/或儿童行为评估系统- 2 (BASC-2;Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004)。家长和教师完成的DESSA和BERS-2各分量表与总量表均有显著相关。DESSA量表和BASC-2自适应技能量表在家长和教师评分者中均显著相关。通过将总保护因子量表及其子量表与BASC-2行为症状指数及临床子量表相关联,探讨DESSA的发散效度。除了焦虑、躯体化和退缩亚量表外,大多数父母评分的相关性都是显著的负相关。对DESSA趋同效度的支持在评分者(如父母;教师)和措施(例如,basic - 2;BERS-2)。因此,这些发现支持DESSA的发散效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convergent and divergent validity of the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment.
This study assessed the convergent and divergent validity of the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA; LeBuffe, Shapiro, & Naglieri, 2008). A total of 227 (n 94 teachers, n 133 parents) raters completed the DESSA, in addition to the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scales–2 (BERS–2; Epstein, 2004) and/or the Behavior Assessment System for Children–2 (BASC–2; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004). All DESSA and BERS–2 subscales and total scales completed by parents and teachers correlated significantly. DESSA subscales and BASC–2 Adaptive Skills subscales correlated significantly for both parent and teacher raters. The divergent validity of the DESSA was explored by correlating the Total Protective Factor scale and subscales with the BASC–2 Behavioral Symptoms Index and clinical subscales. The majority of correlations for the parent ratings were significantly, negatively correlated, with the exception of the Anxiety, Somatization, and Withdrawal subscales. Support for the convergent validity of the DESSA was consistent across raters (e.g., parents; teachers) and measures (e.g., BASC–2; BERS–2). Thus, these findings support the divergent validity of the DESSA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The flagship scholarly journal in the field of school psychology, the journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical analyses, and literature reviews encompassing a full range of methodologies and orientations, including educational, cognitive, social, cognitive behavioral, preventive, dynamic, multicultural, and organizational psychology. Focusing primarily on children, youth, and the adults who serve them, School Psychology Quarterly publishes information pertaining to populations across the life span.
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Cognitive Ability and Math Computation Developmental Relations With Math Problem Solving: An Integrated, Multigroup Approach Supplemental Material for Measuring Teacher Practices and Student Academic Engagement: A Convergent Validity Study Supplemental Material for Influence of Homogeneity of Student Characteristics in a Group-Based Social Competence Intervention Observer and Student Ratings of the Class Environment: A Preliminary Investigation of Convergence Protective Factor Screening for Prevention Practice: Sensitivity and Specificity of the DESSA-Mini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1