以学生为中心的学习实验室护理基础技能教学与传统教学方法的比较

P. Jeffries, Sandy Rew, Joni Cramer
{"title":"以学生为中心的学习实验室护理基础技能教学与传统教学方法的比较","authors":"P. Jeffries, Sandy Rew, Joni Cramer","doi":"10.1043/1536-5026(2002)023<0014:ACOSCV>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two instructional methodologies in teaching basic nursing skills in the learning laboratory. One methodology used an interactive, student-centered focus; the other used traditional lectures and demonstrations. A repeated measures, experimental design was employed, supplemented by qualitative and questionnaire data. Seventy sophomore and 50 junior baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in their fundamentals nursing courses were recruited for this study at a large midwestern university during a period of curriculum revision. The students ranged in age from 19 to 51 years, with a mean age of 23 years. Two methods covering the same content were compared for teaching basic nursing skills. There were no significant differences between the groups' pretest to posttest cognitive gains, although there were cognitive gains for both groups. The groups also were similar in their ability to demonstrate the basic skills correctly in the learning laborato...","PeriodicalId":79520,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and health care perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Student-Centered versus Traditional Methods of Teaching Basic Nursing Skills in a Learning Laboratory\",\"authors\":\"P. Jeffries, Sandy Rew, Joni Cramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1043/1536-5026(2002)023<0014:ACOSCV>2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two instructional methodologies in teaching basic nursing skills in the learning laboratory. One methodology used an interactive, student-centered focus; the other used traditional lectures and demonstrations. A repeated measures, experimental design was employed, supplemented by qualitative and questionnaire data. Seventy sophomore and 50 junior baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in their fundamentals nursing courses were recruited for this study at a large midwestern university during a period of curriculum revision. The students ranged in age from 19 to 51 years, with a mean age of 23 years. Two methods covering the same content were compared for teaching basic nursing skills. There were no significant differences between the groups' pretest to posttest cognitive gains, although there were cognitive gains for both groups. The groups also were similar in their ability to demonstrate the basic skills correctly in the learning laborato...\",\"PeriodicalId\":79520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing and health care perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing and health care perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1043/1536-5026(2002)023<0014:ACOSCV>2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and health care perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1043/1536-5026(2002)023<0014:ACOSCV>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

摘要本研究旨在比较两种教学方法在学习实验室护理基础技能教学中的效果。一种方法采用互动式、以学生为中心的方法;另一组采用传统的讲座和示范。采用重复测量、实验设计,辅以定性和问卷调查数据。本研究以美国中西部一所大型大学为研究对象,在护理基础课程修习期间,共招募70名大二护生和50名大三护生。这些学生的年龄从19岁到51岁不等,平均年龄23岁。比较两种内容相同的护理基础技能教学方法。尽管两组的认知能力都有所提高,但两组在测试前和测试后的认知能力提高方面没有显著差异。两组在学习实验室中正确展示基本技能的能力也相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Student-Centered versus Traditional Methods of Teaching Basic Nursing Skills in a Learning Laboratory
Abstract This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two instructional methodologies in teaching basic nursing skills in the learning laboratory. One methodology used an interactive, student-centered focus; the other used traditional lectures and demonstrations. A repeated measures, experimental design was employed, supplemented by qualitative and questionnaire data. Seventy sophomore and 50 junior baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in their fundamentals nursing courses were recruited for this study at a large midwestern university during a period of curriculum revision. The students ranged in age from 19 to 51 years, with a mean age of 23 years. Two methods covering the same content were compared for teaching basic nursing skills. There were no significant differences between the groups' pretest to posttest cognitive gains, although there were cognitive gains for both groups. The groups also were similar in their ability to demonstrate the basic skills correctly in the learning laborato...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Three Main Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Equations in a Black African Population: A Cross-Sectional Study among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Ghana Combating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Nurses by Improving Sleep The Changed Role of Face Mask A Few Words about Sperm Donation Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1