澳大利亚某教学医院临床药学干预措施浅析

Christopher P Alderman BPharm, FSHP, BCPP, CGP, Christopher Farmer MB, BS, FRACGP, FRACMA
{"title":"澳大利亚某教学医院临床药学干预措施浅析","authors":"Christopher P Alderman BPharm, FSHP, BCPP, CGP,&nbsp;Christopher Farmer MB, BS, FRACGP, FRACMA","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00428.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Selected clinical pharmacy interventions undertaken during a 30-day data capture period were analysed, seeking to gain a greater understanding of the nature of the drug-related problems involved. Pharmacists were asked to record only interventions that were of potentially major significance. A total of 67 interventions were submitted for analysis. In 28 cases (41.7% of the initial total) the intervention reports were excluded from further analysis after initial review. For the remaining 39 interventions, 20 patients (51%) were under the care of a medical unit, and cardiovascular/antithrombotic agents accounted for 17 reports (43.5%). The majority of interventions were implemented at the time of inpatient medication order review by the clinical pharmacist (<i>n</i> = 25, 64%). The most common category of drug-related problem addressed in the interventions related to the prescription of inappropriately high doses of the correct drug for the patient (<i>n</i> = 17, 43.6%). Deficiencies in technical knowledge accounted for less than 25% of all cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 4","pages":"99-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00428.x","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief analysis of clinical pharmacy interventions undertaken in an Australian teaching hospital\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P Alderman BPharm, FSHP, BCPP, CGP,&nbsp;Christopher Farmer MB, BS, FRACGP, FRACMA\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00428.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Selected clinical pharmacy interventions undertaken during a 30-day data capture period were analysed, seeking to gain a greater understanding of the nature of the drug-related problems involved. Pharmacists were asked to record only interventions that were of potentially major significance. A total of 67 interventions were submitted for analysis. In 28 cases (41.7% of the initial total) the intervention reports were excluded from further analysis after initial review. For the remaining 39 interventions, 20 patients (51%) were under the care of a medical unit, and cardiovascular/antithrombotic agents accounted for 17 reports (43.5%). The majority of interventions were implemented at the time of inpatient medication order review by the clinical pharmacist (<i>n</i> = 25, 64%). The most common category of drug-related problem addressed in the interventions related to the prescription of inappropriately high doses of the correct drug for the patient (<i>n</i> = 17, 43.6%). Deficiencies in technical knowledge accounted for less than 25% of all cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"99-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00428.x\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00428.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00428.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

摘要:选定的临床药学干预措施进行了30天的数据采集期间进行了分析,寻求获得一个更大的理解药物相关问题的性质所涉及的。药剂师被要求只记录具有潜在重大意义的干预措施。共有67项干预措施提交分析。在28例(占初始总数的41.7%)中,干预报告在初步审查后被排除在进一步分析之外。在其余39项干预措施中,20名患者(51%)在医疗单位的护理下,心血管/抗血栓药物占17份报告(43.5%)。大多数干预措施是在临床药师审查住院患者用药单时实施的(n = 25, 64%)。在干预措施中,最常见的药物相关问题与给患者开高剂量不适当的正确药物有关(n = 17, 43.6%)。技术知识不足占所有病例的不到25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A brief analysis of clinical pharmacy interventions undertaken in an Australian teaching hospital

Abstract Selected clinical pharmacy interventions undertaken during a 30-day data capture period were analysed, seeking to gain a greater understanding of the nature of the drug-related problems involved. Pharmacists were asked to record only interventions that were of potentially major significance. A total of 67 interventions were submitted for analysis. In 28 cases (41.7% of the initial total) the intervention reports were excluded from further analysis after initial review. For the remaining 39 interventions, 20 patients (51%) were under the care of a medical unit, and cardiovascular/antithrombotic agents accounted for 17 reports (43.5%). The majority of interventions were implemented at the time of inpatient medication order review by the clinical pharmacist (n = 25, 64%). The most common category of drug-related problem addressed in the interventions related to the prescription of inappropriately high doses of the correct drug for the patient (n = 17, 43.6%). Deficiencies in technical knowledge accounted for less than 25% of all cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health technology assessment. Notices Letters to the Editor Notices Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1