{"title":"魔法便士早期读写计划对音素意识和基本阅读技能影响的初步研究","authors":"C. Casey, C. Cook-Cottone, Courtney N. Baker","doi":"10.1037/e534932013-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current pilot study was an investigation into the effectiveness of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program reading curriculum among kindergarten students. Magic Penny was introduced as a supplement to the existing curriculum in the intervention classroom for approximately three months. Reading achievement was assessed using a selection of tests from the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities and the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement that comprise the Basic Reading Skills Cluster and the Phonemic Awareness III Clinical Cluster. Utilizing a between-group comparison and longitudinal study design, group differences between intervention (n = 19) and comparison (n = 19) classrooms on the early literacy outcome measures were examined using linear regression models. Results provided mixed support for the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. Analyses indicated that intervention group membership was associated with greater improvement in children’s Basic Reading scores, when controlling for pre-test scores. In contrast, intervention group membership was not associated with greater improvement in children’s Phonemic Awareness scores. This study represents the first formal evaluation of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. However, this pilot study was limited in scope and lacked random assignment. Given its limitations, additional, larger-scale research is warranted to further examine the impact of this new program.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"9 1","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Study of Effects of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program on Phonemic Awareness and Basic Reading Skills\",\"authors\":\"C. Casey, C. Cook-Cottone, Courtney N. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e534932013-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current pilot study was an investigation into the effectiveness of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program reading curriculum among kindergarten students. Magic Penny was introduced as a supplement to the existing curriculum in the intervention classroom for approximately three months. Reading achievement was assessed using a selection of tests from the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities and the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement that comprise the Basic Reading Skills Cluster and the Phonemic Awareness III Clinical Cluster. Utilizing a between-group comparison and longitudinal study design, group differences between intervention (n = 19) and comparison (n = 19) classrooms on the early literacy outcome measures were examined using linear regression models. Results provided mixed support for the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. Analyses indicated that intervention group membership was associated with greater improvement in children’s Basic Reading scores, when controlling for pre-test scores. In contrast, intervention group membership was not associated with greater improvement in children’s Phonemic Awareness scores. This study represents the first formal evaluation of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. However, this pilot study was limited in scope and lacked random assignment. Given its limitations, additional, larger-scale research is warranted to further examine the impact of this new program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"74-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e534932013-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e534932013-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Pilot Study of Effects of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program on Phonemic Awareness and Basic Reading Skills
The current pilot study was an investigation into the effectiveness of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program reading curriculum among kindergarten students. Magic Penny was introduced as a supplement to the existing curriculum in the intervention classroom for approximately three months. Reading achievement was assessed using a selection of tests from the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities and the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement that comprise the Basic Reading Skills Cluster and the Phonemic Awareness III Clinical Cluster. Utilizing a between-group comparison and longitudinal study design, group differences between intervention (n = 19) and comparison (n = 19) classrooms on the early literacy outcome measures were examined using linear regression models. Results provided mixed support for the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. Analyses indicated that intervention group membership was associated with greater improvement in children’s Basic Reading scores, when controlling for pre-test scores. In contrast, intervention group membership was not associated with greater improvement in children’s Phonemic Awareness scores. This study represents the first formal evaluation of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. However, this pilot study was limited in scope and lacked random assignment. Given its limitations, additional, larger-scale research is warranted to further examine the impact of this new program.