{"title":"做纲领性研究:来自社会心理学的两个案例研究","authors":"B. Randolph-Seng","doi":"10.1037/e741562011-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a new researcher, transferring knowledge of the scientific process into an actual contribution to that process can be difficult. The purpose of this article is to first demonstrate how a deductive vs. inductive approach can be implemented in a program of research, and second to provide insights on using each approach in the science of psychology. Specifically, the histories of Michael A. Hogg's and John A. Bargh's programmatic research will be traced, followed by a critical comparison of each method. Finally, insights on doing programmatic research in psychology will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":"73-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing Programmatic Research: Two Case Studies from Social Psychology\",\"authors\":\"B. Randolph-Seng\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e741562011-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a new researcher, transferring knowledge of the scientific process into an actual contribution to that process can be difficult. The purpose of this article is to first demonstrate how a deductive vs. inductive approach can be implemented in a program of research, and second to provide insights on using each approach in the science of psychology. Specifically, the histories of Michael A. Hogg's and John A. Bargh's programmatic research will be traced, followed by a critical comparison of each method. Finally, insights on doing programmatic research in psychology will be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"73-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741562011-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741562011-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
作为一名新的研究人员,将科学过程的知识转化为对该过程的实际贡献可能很困难。本文的目的首先是演示演绎与归纳方法如何在研究项目中实施,其次是提供在心理学科学中使用每种方法的见解。具体来说,我们将追溯Michael a . Hogg和John a . Bargh的纲领性研究的历史,然后对每种方法进行批判性的比较。最后,将讨论在心理学中进行程序化研究的见解。
Doing Programmatic Research: Two Case Studies from Social Psychology
As a new researcher, transferring knowledge of the scientific process into an actual contribution to that process can be difficult. The purpose of this article is to first demonstrate how a deductive vs. inductive approach can be implemented in a program of research, and second to provide insights on using each approach in the science of psychology. Specifically, the histories of Michael A. Hogg's and John A. Bargh's programmatic research will be traced, followed by a critical comparison of each method. Finally, insights on doing programmatic research in psychology will be discussed.