知识权威和制度权威。

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Legal Education Pub Date : 1992-06-01 DOI:10.1080/00201749208602286
C. Collier
{"title":"知识权威和制度权威。","authors":"C. Collier","doi":"10.1080/00201749208602286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers a defense of ‘intellectual authority’, primarily by pointing out the untoward implications of its conceptual opposite, ‘institutional authority’, in a wide variety of contexts. An opening discussion explores conditions for the possibility of intellectual authority in legal, humanistic, and aesthetic disciplines. Social science literature documenting and describing the biasing influence of institutional authority is then canvassed and analyzed in some detail. A final section assays the theoretical significance of various efforts to eliminate non‐intellectual bias and influence, with special reference to the example of “blind reviewing’ of scholarly manuscripts.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00201749208602286","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual Authority and Institutional Authority.\",\"authors\":\"C. Collier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00201749208602286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay offers a defense of ‘intellectual authority’, primarily by pointing out the untoward implications of its conceptual opposite, ‘institutional authority’, in a wide variety of contexts. An opening discussion explores conditions for the possibility of intellectual authority in legal, humanistic, and aesthetic disciplines. Social science literature documenting and describing the biasing influence of institutional authority is then canvassed and analyzed in some detail. A final section assays the theoretical significance of various efforts to eliminate non‐intellectual bias and influence, with special reference to the example of “blind reviewing’ of scholarly manuscripts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00201749208602286\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这篇文章为“知识权威”提供了辩护,主要是通过指出其概念对立面“制度权威”在各种各样的背景下的不利含义。开篇讨论探讨了法律、人文和美学学科中知识权威可能性的条件。社会科学文献记录和描述了制度权威的偏见影响,然后进行了详细的调查和分析。最后一节分析了消除非智力偏见和影响的各种努力的理论意义,特别提到了对学术手稿的“盲目审查”的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intellectual Authority and Institutional Authority.
This essay offers a defense of ‘intellectual authority’, primarily by pointing out the untoward implications of its conceptual opposite, ‘institutional authority’, in a wide variety of contexts. An opening discussion explores conditions for the possibility of intellectual authority in legal, humanistic, and aesthetic disciplines. Social science literature documenting and describing the biasing influence of institutional authority is then canvassed and analyzed in some detail. A final section assays the theoretical significance of various efforts to eliminate non‐intellectual bias and influence, with special reference to the example of “blind reviewing’ of scholarly manuscripts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Legal Education
Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.
期刊最新文献
Cases and Places: A Field-Based Approach to Teaching Natural Resource and Environmental Law The Elite Teaching the Elite: Who Gets Hired by the Top Law Schools? A Simple Low-Cost Institutional Learning-Outcomes Assessment Process The Sharpest Tool in the Toolbox: Visual Legal Rhetoric Rescuing Pluto from the Cold: Creating an Assessment-Centered Legal Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1