金黄色葡萄球菌血症后的长期生存结局

Chong W. Ong MBBS(Hons), FRACP, FRCPA , Jan L. Roberts RN, BHSc(Nursing), CICP , Peter J. Collignon MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), FASM, FRACP, FRCPA
{"title":"金黄色葡萄球菌血症后的长期生存结局","authors":"Chong W. Ong MBBS(Hons), FRACP, FRCPA ,&nbsp;Jan L. Roberts RN, BHSc(Nursing), CICP ,&nbsp;Peter J. Collignon MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), FASM, FRACP, FRCPA","doi":"10.1071/HI12062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To describe long-term survival (beyond 200 days) following <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> bacteraemia (SAB) and to determine if certain patient subgroups had poorer long-term survival outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of all SAB cases at The Canberra Hospital, a tertiary referral centre, from January 1998 to December 2007 was performed. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from a pre-existing prospectively collected database. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 9 months. Subsets within the cohort were analysed for differences in long-term survival. The main outcome measure was death from any cause.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the 3889-day study observation period, 439 patients had SAB and were followed for a total of 546 360 person-days. The overall median survival was 3169 days. The mortality rates were 9.6%, 17%, 24%, 29% and 32% at 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days respectively. Atotal of 188 (43%) patients died. Of the 188 deaths, 22%, 40%, 55%, 67% and 75% occurred within the first 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days respectively after their SAB episode. Initial analysis showed poorer long-term survival in those patients with older age, MRSA, with an unknown focus of infection, and who were not admitted under the Infectious Diseases team. However, on multivariate analysis, the only independent risk factors for poorer survival were older age, unknown focus of infection and not being admitted under the Infectious Diseases team. MRSA, sex, surgical vs non-surgical admitting team and an association with an intravascular device were not associated with poorer long-term survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>High rates of death continue for many months after patients have an episode of SAB. Short-term follow-up studies (30 days or less) may miss large numbers of SAB-associated deaths. If accurate data on SAB associated mortality is needed, then follow-up of these patients will be needed for at least 90 days, ideally performed prospectively with a matched control group consisting of hospitalised patients without SAB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 3","pages":"Pages 102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12062","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term survival outcome following Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia\",\"authors\":\"Chong W. Ong MBBS(Hons), FRACP, FRCPA ,&nbsp;Jan L. Roberts RN, BHSc(Nursing), CICP ,&nbsp;Peter J. Collignon MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), FASM, FRACP, FRCPA\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HI12062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To describe long-term survival (beyond 200 days) following <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> bacteraemia (SAB) and to determine if certain patient subgroups had poorer long-term survival outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of all SAB cases at The Canberra Hospital, a tertiary referral centre, from January 1998 to December 2007 was performed. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from a pre-existing prospectively collected database. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 9 months. Subsets within the cohort were analysed for differences in long-term survival. The main outcome measure was death from any cause.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the 3889-day study observation period, 439 patients had SAB and were followed for a total of 546 360 person-days. The overall median survival was 3169 days. The mortality rates were 9.6%, 17%, 24%, 29% and 32% at 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days respectively. Atotal of 188 (43%) patients died. Of the 188 deaths, 22%, 40%, 55%, 67% and 75% occurred within the first 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days respectively after their SAB episode. Initial analysis showed poorer long-term survival in those patients with older age, MRSA, with an unknown focus of infection, and who were not admitted under the Infectious Diseases team. However, on multivariate analysis, the only independent risk factors for poorer survival were older age, unknown focus of infection and not being admitted under the Infectious Diseases team. MRSA, sex, surgical vs non-surgical admitting team and an association with an intravascular device were not associated with poorer long-term survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>High rates of death continue for many months after patients have an episode of SAB. Short-term follow-up studies (30 days or less) may miss large numbers of SAB-associated deaths. If accurate data on SAB associated mortality is needed, then follow-up of these patients will be needed for at least 90 days, ideally performed prospectively with a matched control group consisting of hospitalised patients without SAB.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 102-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12062\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的描述金黄色葡萄球菌血症(SAB)后的长期生存(超过200天),并确定某些患者亚组是否有较差的长期生存结果。方法对1998年1月至2007年12月三级转诊中心堪培拉医院的所有SAB病例进行单中心、回顾性、队列研究。临床和人口统计数据从预先存在的前瞻性收集的数据库中获得。患者随访至少9个月。对队列中的亚组进行长期生存差异分析。主要结局指标是任何原因导致的死亡。结果在3889天的研究观察期内,439例患者发生SAB,共随访546 360人次天。总中位生存期为3169天。第7、30、90、180和365天的死亡率分别为9.6%、17%、24%、29%和32%。共有188例(43%)患者死亡。在188例死亡病例中,分别有22%、40%、55%、67%和75%发生在SAB发作后的前7天、30天、90天、180天和365天。初步分析显示,年龄较大、MRSA感染灶不明、不在传染病组住院的患者长期生存率较差。然而,在多变量分析中,生存率较低的唯一独立风险因素是年龄较大,感染焦点未知以及未在传染病小组下入院。MRSA、性别、手术与非手术入院团队以及与血管内装置的关联与较差的长期生存率无关。结论SAB发作后患者的高死亡率持续数月。短期随访研究(30天或更短)可能遗漏大量与sabb相关的死亡病例。如果需要SAB相关死亡率的准确数据,则需要对这些患者进行至少90天的随访,理想情况下,与没有SAB的住院患者组成的匹配对照组进行前瞻性随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term survival outcome following Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

Aims

To describe long-term survival (beyond 200 days) following Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) and to determine if certain patient subgroups had poorer long-term survival outcomes.

Methods

A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of all SAB cases at The Canberra Hospital, a tertiary referral centre, from January 1998 to December 2007 was performed. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from a pre-existing prospectively collected database. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 9 months. Subsets within the cohort were analysed for differences in long-term survival. The main outcome measure was death from any cause.

Results

During the 3889-day study observation period, 439 patients had SAB and were followed for a total of 546 360 person-days. The overall median survival was 3169 days. The mortality rates were 9.6%, 17%, 24%, 29% and 32% at 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days respectively. Atotal of 188 (43%) patients died. Of the 188 deaths, 22%, 40%, 55%, 67% and 75% occurred within the first 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days respectively after their SAB episode. Initial analysis showed poorer long-term survival in those patients with older age, MRSA, with an unknown focus of infection, and who were not admitted under the Infectious Diseases team. However, on multivariate analysis, the only independent risk factors for poorer survival were older age, unknown focus of infection and not being admitted under the Infectious Diseases team. MRSA, sex, surgical vs non-surgical admitting team and an association with an intravascular device were not associated with poorer long-term survival.

Conclusions

High rates of death continue for many months after patients have an episode of SAB. Short-term follow-up studies (30 days or less) may miss large numbers of SAB-associated deaths. If accurate data on SAB associated mortality is needed, then follow-up of these patients will be needed for at least 90 days, ideally performed prospectively with a matched control group consisting of hospitalised patients without SAB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in publication scholarship in Healthcare Infection: a 12-year analysis Cross-sectional screening of healthcare workers at a regional chest clinic with an interferon gamma release assay: first report from Sri Lanka Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study Cultural dimensions relevant to antimicrobial stewardship: the contribution of individualism and power distance to perioperative prescribing practices in European hospitals Time series evaluation of the 3M™ Clean-Trace™ ATP detection device to confirm swab effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1