无衬垫、可重复使用的临床垃圾箱系统对澳大利亚一家急症护理医院的成本、废物量和感染风险的影响

Fiona De Sousa MAP (Nursing: Infection Control) BN , Diana Martin , Terry Grimmond Fellow Aust. Soc. Microbiology BAgrSc GradDipAdEd
{"title":"无衬垫、可重复使用的临床垃圾箱系统对澳大利亚一家急症护理医院的成本、废物量和感染风险的影响","authors":"Fiona De Sousa MAP (Nursing: Infection Control) BN ,&nbsp;Diana Martin ,&nbsp;Terry Grimmond Fellow Aust. Soc. Microbiology BAgrSc GradDipAdEd","doi":"10.1071/HI13048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Regular audits of clinical waste (CW) disposal systems and examination of new technologies can lead to cost and waste reductions, and lowering of infection potential. Sydney Adventist hospital, a 360-bed acute-care private facility, noted that their 240<!--> <!-->L, clinical waste (CW) bin system posed issues with infection risk, staff injury risk, aesthetics, logistics, space and cost and evaluated a new, linerless, reusable bin system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A facility-wide audit was conducted of the current 240<!--> <!-->L bin system before a three ward, 3-month staff evaluation of the new, 64<!--> <!-->L, linerless, reusable bin system (Clinismart, SteriHealth Ltd, Melbourne, Vic., Australia). Clinical waste volume and mass were compared between systems over a 30-month period as were contractor costs, labour, space requirements and general waste (GW) mass. Staff opinion was sought via a 10-point questionnaire, and infection and injury risks audited.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inpatient workloads remained static over the study. Staff evaluations showed a strong preference for the new system which was rolled-out to all wards in the facility. Significant decreases were noted in CW mass (53.2% less), CW volume (65.2% less), CW disposal costs (30.9% less) and labour (69.2% less), and the new system was found to be more space-efficient and logistically superior. Waste segregation was markedly enhanced. Infection potential and injury risks noted with the 240<!--> <!-->L system were eliminated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found that the use of a smaller, 64<!--> <!-->L, linerless, reusable, hospital wastebin system, through its design and operation, has the potential to reduce clinical waste volumes, increase labour efficiencies, decrease costs and minimise infection potential and sharps injury risk, all of which improve the quality of health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 76-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13048","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a linerless, reusable, clinical wastebin system on costs, waste volumes and infection risk in an Australian acute-care hospital\",\"authors\":\"Fiona De Sousa MAP (Nursing: Infection Control) BN ,&nbsp;Diana Martin ,&nbsp;Terry Grimmond Fellow Aust. Soc. Microbiology BAgrSc GradDipAdEd\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HI13048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Regular audits of clinical waste (CW) disposal systems and examination of new technologies can lead to cost and waste reductions, and lowering of infection potential. Sydney Adventist hospital, a 360-bed acute-care private facility, noted that their 240<!--> <!-->L, clinical waste (CW) bin system posed issues with infection risk, staff injury risk, aesthetics, logistics, space and cost and evaluated a new, linerless, reusable bin system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A facility-wide audit was conducted of the current 240<!--> <!-->L bin system before a three ward, 3-month staff evaluation of the new, 64<!--> <!-->L, linerless, reusable bin system (Clinismart, SteriHealth Ltd, Melbourne, Vic., Australia). Clinical waste volume and mass were compared between systems over a 30-month period as were contractor costs, labour, space requirements and general waste (GW) mass. Staff opinion was sought via a 10-point questionnaire, and infection and injury risks audited.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inpatient workloads remained static over the study. Staff evaluations showed a strong preference for the new system which was rolled-out to all wards in the facility. Significant decreases were noted in CW mass (53.2% less), CW volume (65.2% less), CW disposal costs (30.9% less) and labour (69.2% less), and the new system was found to be more space-efficient and logistically superior. Waste segregation was markedly enhanced. Infection potential and injury risks noted with the 240<!--> <!-->L system were eliminated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found that the use of a smaller, 64<!--> <!-->L, linerless, reusable, hospital wastebin system, through its design and operation, has the potential to reduce clinical waste volumes, increase labour efficiencies, decrease costs and minimise infection potential and sharps injury risk, all of which improve the quality of health care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 76-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13048\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

定期审核医疗废物处置系统和研究新技术,可减少成本和废物,并降低感染的可能性。悉尼Adventist医院是一家拥有360张床位的急性护理私人机构,他们指出,他们的240l医疗废物(CW)垃圾箱系统存在感染风险、员工受伤风险、美学、物流、空间和成本等问题,并评估了一种新的、无内衬的、可重复使用的垃圾箱系统。方法在对新的64升无衬垫可重复使用垃圾箱系统(Clinismart, SteriHealth Ltd,墨尔本,维多利亚州)进行三个病房、三个月的工作人员评估之前,对现有的240升垃圾箱系统进行了全设施的审核。、澳大利亚)。在30个月的时间里,比较了不同系统的医疗废物数量和质量,以及承包商成本、劳动力、空间需求和一般废物质量。通过10点调查表征求工作人员的意见,并审计了感染和伤害风险。结果在整个研究过程中,患者的工作量保持不变。工作人员的评价表明,他们对新系统有强烈的偏好,该系统已推广到该设施的所有病房。新系统显著降低了化学武器质量(减少53.2%)、化学武器体积(减少65.2%)、化学武器处理成本(减少30.9%)和人工(减少69.2%),而且发现新系统更节省空间,在后勤上也更优越。废物分类明显加强。240l系统的潜在感染和伤害风险被消除。结论研究发现,使用更小、64升、无衬垫、可重复使用的医院垃圾箱系统,通过其设计和操作,有可能减少医疗废物量,提高劳动效率,降低成本,最大限度地减少感染的可能性和尖锐伤害的风险,所有这些都提高了医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a linerless, reusable, clinical wastebin system on costs, waste volumes and infection risk in an Australian acute-care hospital

Introduction

Regular audits of clinical waste (CW) disposal systems and examination of new technologies can lead to cost and waste reductions, and lowering of infection potential. Sydney Adventist hospital, a 360-bed acute-care private facility, noted that their 240 L, clinical waste (CW) bin system posed issues with infection risk, staff injury risk, aesthetics, logistics, space and cost and evaluated a new, linerless, reusable bin system.

Methods

A facility-wide audit was conducted of the current 240 L bin system before a three ward, 3-month staff evaluation of the new, 64 L, linerless, reusable bin system (Clinismart, SteriHealth Ltd, Melbourne, Vic., Australia). Clinical waste volume and mass were compared between systems over a 30-month period as were contractor costs, labour, space requirements and general waste (GW) mass. Staff opinion was sought via a 10-point questionnaire, and infection and injury risks audited.

Results

Inpatient workloads remained static over the study. Staff evaluations showed a strong preference for the new system which was rolled-out to all wards in the facility. Significant decreases were noted in CW mass (53.2% less), CW volume (65.2% less), CW disposal costs (30.9% less) and labour (69.2% less), and the new system was found to be more space-efficient and logistically superior. Waste segregation was markedly enhanced. Infection potential and injury risks noted with the 240 L system were eliminated.

Conclusion

The study found that the use of a smaller, 64 L, linerless, reusable, hospital wastebin system, through its design and operation, has the potential to reduce clinical waste volumes, increase labour efficiencies, decrease costs and minimise infection potential and sharps injury risk, all of which improve the quality of health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in publication scholarship in Healthcare Infection: a 12-year analysis Cross-sectional screening of healthcare workers at a regional chest clinic with an interferon gamma release assay: first report from Sri Lanka Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study Cultural dimensions relevant to antimicrobial stewardship: the contribution of individualism and power distance to perioperative prescribing practices in European hospitals Time series evaluation of the 3M™ Clean-Trace™ ATP detection device to confirm swab effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1