西伯利亚的土著少数民族与20世纪20年代的俄罗斯社会语言学:分开的生活?

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Borealia Pub Date : 2015-07-03 DOI:10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672
N. Vakhtin
{"title":"西伯利亚的土著少数民族与20世纪20年代的俄罗斯社会语言学:分开的生活?","authors":"N. Vakhtin","doi":"10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the 1920s, two strong intellectual trends were simultaneously developing in Russia: the studies of languages and cultures of the indigenous population of Siberia and the Far North (led by Vladimir Bogoras, Leo Shternberg, and others), and sociolinguistic studies (led by Evgeniy Polivanov, Afanasiy Selischev, Rosaliya Shor, and others). Sociolinguistics as a new and fashionable branch of knowledge included many topics (sociolinguistic theory, social dialectology, influence of rapid social changes on language), but there never were attempts to study sociolinguistically the languages of indigenous “Northern” minorities. In 1929 Roman Jakobson and Nikolai Trubetskoy, who by that time were both living abroad, launched a project called “Languages of the USSR.” The project could have united the two trends, but it was soon terminated because of the Great Depression in the West and a sharp turn in Stalin's policy in 1929 when many Russian scholars were prosecuted, academia became split in a fight over who represented “the true Marxism”, and international collaboration became dangerous for Russian scholars. Another reason for the lack of interest in sociolinguistic studies of indigenous minority languages was the evolutionist paradigm of Siberianist cultural anthropology of the time. As a result, the Soviet language planning for Northern indigenous minority languages in the1930s and later did not sufficiently take into account the sociolinguistic aspect of the problem; this may be responsible for its many failures and inconsistencies.","PeriodicalId":44093,"journal":{"name":"Acta Borealia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous minorities of Siberia and Russian sociolinguistics of the 1920s: A life apart?\",\"authors\":\"N. Vakhtin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the 1920s, two strong intellectual trends were simultaneously developing in Russia: the studies of languages and cultures of the indigenous population of Siberia and the Far North (led by Vladimir Bogoras, Leo Shternberg, and others), and sociolinguistic studies (led by Evgeniy Polivanov, Afanasiy Selischev, Rosaliya Shor, and others). Sociolinguistics as a new and fashionable branch of knowledge included many topics (sociolinguistic theory, social dialectology, influence of rapid social changes on language), but there never were attempts to study sociolinguistically the languages of indigenous “Northern” minorities. In 1929 Roman Jakobson and Nikolai Trubetskoy, who by that time were both living abroad, launched a project called “Languages of the USSR.” The project could have united the two trends, but it was soon terminated because of the Great Depression in the West and a sharp turn in Stalin's policy in 1929 when many Russian scholars were prosecuted, academia became split in a fight over who represented “the true Marxism”, and international collaboration became dangerous for Russian scholars. Another reason for the lack of interest in sociolinguistic studies of indigenous minority languages was the evolutionist paradigm of Siberianist cultural anthropology of the time. As a result, the Soviet language planning for Northern indigenous minority languages in the1930s and later did not sufficiently take into account the sociolinguistic aspect of the problem; this may be responsible for its many failures and inconsistencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Borealia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Borealia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Borealia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2015.1089672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪20年代,俄罗斯同时出现了两股强大的学术潮流:西伯利亚和远北地区土著居民的语言和文化研究(由弗拉基米尔·博戈拉斯、利奥·谢滕伯格等人领导)和社会语言学研究(由叶夫根尼·波利瓦诺夫、阿法纳西·塞利舍夫、罗萨里娅·肖尔等人领导)。社会语言学作为一门新兴的、流行的知识分支,包括许多主题(社会语言学理论、社会方言学、快速社会变化对语言的影响),但从来没有人试图从社会语言学的角度研究土著“北方”少数民族的语言。1929年,罗曼·雅各布森(Roman Jakobson)和尼古拉·特鲁别茨科伊(Nikolai Trubetskoy)发起了一个名为“苏联语言”的项目,当时两人都住在国外。这个项目本来可以将这两种趋势结合起来,但由于西方的大萧条和斯大林在1929年政策的急剧转变,许多俄罗斯学者被起诉,学术界在谁代表“真正的马克思主义”的斗争中分裂,国际合作对俄罗斯学者来说变得危险。对土著少数民族语言的社会语言学研究缺乏兴趣的另一个原因是当时西伯利亚文化人类学的进化范式。因此,苏联在20世纪30年代和后来对北方土著少数民族语言的语言规划没有充分考虑到这个问题的社会语言学方面;这可能是它的许多失败和不一致的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indigenous minorities of Siberia and Russian sociolinguistics of the 1920s: A life apart?
ABSTRACT In the 1920s, two strong intellectual trends were simultaneously developing in Russia: the studies of languages and cultures of the indigenous population of Siberia and the Far North (led by Vladimir Bogoras, Leo Shternberg, and others), and sociolinguistic studies (led by Evgeniy Polivanov, Afanasiy Selischev, Rosaliya Shor, and others). Sociolinguistics as a new and fashionable branch of knowledge included many topics (sociolinguistic theory, social dialectology, influence of rapid social changes on language), but there never were attempts to study sociolinguistically the languages of indigenous “Northern” minorities. In 1929 Roman Jakobson and Nikolai Trubetskoy, who by that time were both living abroad, launched a project called “Languages of the USSR.” The project could have united the two trends, but it was soon terminated because of the Great Depression in the West and a sharp turn in Stalin's policy in 1929 when many Russian scholars were prosecuted, academia became split in a fight over who represented “the true Marxism”, and international collaboration became dangerous for Russian scholars. Another reason for the lack of interest in sociolinguistic studies of indigenous minority languages was the evolutionist paradigm of Siberianist cultural anthropology of the time. As a result, the Soviet language planning for Northern indigenous minority languages in the1930s and later did not sufficiently take into account the sociolinguistic aspect of the problem; this may be responsible for its many failures and inconsistencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Borealia
Acta Borealia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Sustaining local practices: introductory remarks Learning to relocalize: institutional entrepreneurs as transformative agents in public food services Premodern handcraft skills foster a language which opens an experiential pathway to local nature Disclosing the sacred in technological practices for sustainability Peripheral sustainability expertise on technology: an autoethnography amidst the polycrisis*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1