教师对评估实践的看法

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Journal Pub Date : 2014-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09585176.2013.874952
Päivi Atjonen
{"title":"教师对评估实践的看法","authors":"Päivi Atjonen","doi":"10.1080/09585176.2013.874952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this research was to analyse teachers’ views of pupil assessment. The theoretical framework was based on existing literature on advances and challenges of pupil assessment in regard to support for learning, fairness, educational partnership, feedback, and favourable methods. The data were gathered by means of a questionnaire designed for teachers of comprehensive schools. Teachers were first asked to describe a good (right/fair) and a bad (wrong/unfair) case of pupil assessment selected from the period of latest three years. Second, two lists of factors were presented, and respondents were asked to indicate which were the most influential in making pupil assessment either difficult or easy. One hundred twenty-six teachers completed and returned the questionnaire. A descriptive, mainly qualitative approach was used to analyse the data. The majority of positive views concerned the use of different assessment methods, an interactive approach, encouraging feedback, and criteria clarification. Negative views dealt with improper assessment methods, level of stringency, badly implemented assessment, and weak grounds for assessment. Three factors made assessment as difficult: interpretation of fairness, pupils with special needs, and pupils’ heterogeneity. On the other hand, versatile assessment methods, curriculum advice, and pupils’ good competencies made teachers’ assessment work easy.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2013.874952","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ views of their assessment practice\",\"authors\":\"Päivi Atjonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09585176.2013.874952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main aim of this research was to analyse teachers’ views of pupil assessment. The theoretical framework was based on existing literature on advances and challenges of pupil assessment in regard to support for learning, fairness, educational partnership, feedback, and favourable methods. The data were gathered by means of a questionnaire designed for teachers of comprehensive schools. Teachers were first asked to describe a good (right/fair) and a bad (wrong/unfair) case of pupil assessment selected from the period of latest three years. Second, two lists of factors were presented, and respondents were asked to indicate which were the most influential in making pupil assessment either difficult or easy. One hundred twenty-six teachers completed and returned the questionnaire. A descriptive, mainly qualitative approach was used to analyse the data. The majority of positive views concerned the use of different assessment methods, an interactive approach, encouraging feedback, and criteria clarification. Negative views dealt with improper assessment methods, level of stringency, badly implemented assessment, and weak grounds for assessment. Three factors made assessment as difficult: interpretation of fairness, pupils with special needs, and pupils’ heterogeneity. On the other hand, versatile assessment methods, curriculum advice, and pupils’ good competencies made teachers’ assessment work easy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2013.874952\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.874952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.874952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

本研究的主要目的是分析教师对学生评价的看法。理论框架是基于现有文献的进步和挑战的学生评估在支持学习,公平,教育伙伴关系,反馈和有利的方法。采用问卷调查的方式对综合学校教师进行问卷调查。教师们首先被要求描述一个好的(正确的/公平的)和一个坏的(错误的/不公平的)学生评估的案例,从最近三年的时间里选出。其次,提出了两个因素清单,并要求答复者指出哪些因素对学生评估是困难的还是容易的最有影响。126名教师完成并上交了调查问卷。使用描述性,主要是定性的方法来分析数据。大多数积极意见涉及使用不同的评估方法、互动方法、鼓励反馈和澄清标准。负面意见涉及评估方法不当、严格程度、评估执行不力和评估基础薄弱。三个因素使评估变得困难:公平的解释,有特殊需要的学生,以及学生的异质性。另一方面,多样化的评估方法、课程建议和学生良好的能力使教师的评估工作变得容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers’ views of their assessment practice
The main aim of this research was to analyse teachers’ views of pupil assessment. The theoretical framework was based on existing literature on advances and challenges of pupil assessment in regard to support for learning, fairness, educational partnership, feedback, and favourable methods. The data were gathered by means of a questionnaire designed for teachers of comprehensive schools. Teachers were first asked to describe a good (right/fair) and a bad (wrong/unfair) case of pupil assessment selected from the period of latest three years. Second, two lists of factors were presented, and respondents were asked to indicate which were the most influential in making pupil assessment either difficult or easy. One hundred twenty-six teachers completed and returned the questionnaire. A descriptive, mainly qualitative approach was used to analyse the data. The majority of positive views concerned the use of different assessment methods, an interactive approach, encouraging feedback, and criteria clarification. Negative views dealt with improper assessment methods, level of stringency, badly implemented assessment, and weak grounds for assessment. Three factors made assessment as difficult: interpretation of fairness, pupils with special needs, and pupils’ heterogeneity. On the other hand, versatile assessment methods, curriculum advice, and pupils’ good competencies made teachers’ assessment work easy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Curriculum making and knowledge conceptions in classrooms in the context of standards‐based curricula Review of: Curriculum challenges and opportunities in a changing world: Transnational perspectives in curriculum inquiryB.Green (Eds.) M.Brennan (Eds.) P.Roberts (Eds.) Palgrave MacMillan, 2021, XVII + 355 pp. ISBN 978‐3‐030‐61666‐3. 129,99 € (Hardcover). Teachers’ Perceptions of Physical literacy Curriculum in context Learners’ views of literature in EFL education from curricular and assessment perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1