2. 长篇书评

Q4 Social Sciences Communication Booknotes Quarterly Pub Date : 2015-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956
D. McLeod, Dhavan V. Shah, Weiwu Zhang
{"title":"2. 长篇书评","authors":"D. McLeod, Dhavan V. Shah, Weiwu Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"exchanges, rallying around prosocial causes, etc. On the other hand, Redditors often come across harboring the mob mentality such as involvement in the Boston Marathon Bombing and the ‘‘cringeworthy’’ postings. Chapter 4 details the socialization process of novice Reddit members becoming full-fledged Redditors and what this status change means for their relationship with the Reddit community at large. It also details the scornful attitude toward default subreddits and the varied ways Reddiquette (informal Reddit community rules) is viewed in the Reddit community. Chapter 5 concerns both the humorously clever and serious ways Redditors express themselves in the platform. It details how the Reddit platform features enable innovative expressions from memes to novelty accounts to reaction GIFs and how Redditors value meaningful contributions and ridicule repetitive ‘‘shitposting’’ and ‘‘karmawhoring.’’ Chapter 6 addresses the dark side of Reddit discourse that further marginalizes women and minority groups such as ‘‘male gaze’’ and geek masculinity that excludes women and minority groups. Chapter 7 concludes the book by providing a summary of findings, situating them in a broader context of Reddit platform politics and participatory culture, and suggesting possible directions for future research in this area. Reddit as a content and repost sharing social networking site has been documented in having the ability to form various online communities. I am surprised to find the book only gives passing treatment of the important concepts of social capital and civic engagement. It does not adequately cover another important research domain in selective exposure and polarization on social networking sites though it mentions ‘‘echo chamber’’ in passing. Despite the limitations already mentioned, the book is arguably the first to fill a scholarly void by examining one of the social networking sites—Reddit, its formation and development of relationships within the platform, its dual role for charity, prosocial causes and further marginalization of women and minority groups. The author’s ethnography method has a big advantage of capturing Reddit community actions in real time. Overall, this is a solid booklength treatment of a dynamic social networking site.","PeriodicalId":38174,"journal":{"name":"Communication Booknotes Quarterly","volume":"46 1","pages":"139 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2. Longer Single Book Reviews\",\"authors\":\"D. McLeod, Dhavan V. Shah, Weiwu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"exchanges, rallying around prosocial causes, etc. On the other hand, Redditors often come across harboring the mob mentality such as involvement in the Boston Marathon Bombing and the ‘‘cringeworthy’’ postings. Chapter 4 details the socialization process of novice Reddit members becoming full-fledged Redditors and what this status change means for their relationship with the Reddit community at large. It also details the scornful attitude toward default subreddits and the varied ways Reddiquette (informal Reddit community rules) is viewed in the Reddit community. Chapter 5 concerns both the humorously clever and serious ways Redditors express themselves in the platform. It details how the Reddit platform features enable innovative expressions from memes to novelty accounts to reaction GIFs and how Redditors value meaningful contributions and ridicule repetitive ‘‘shitposting’’ and ‘‘karmawhoring.’’ Chapter 6 addresses the dark side of Reddit discourse that further marginalizes women and minority groups such as ‘‘male gaze’’ and geek masculinity that excludes women and minority groups. Chapter 7 concludes the book by providing a summary of findings, situating them in a broader context of Reddit platform politics and participatory culture, and suggesting possible directions for future research in this area. Reddit as a content and repost sharing social networking site has been documented in having the ability to form various online communities. I am surprised to find the book only gives passing treatment of the important concepts of social capital and civic engagement. It does not adequately cover another important research domain in selective exposure and polarization on social networking sites though it mentions ‘‘echo chamber’’ in passing. Despite the limitations already mentioned, the book is arguably the first to fill a scholarly void by examining one of the social networking sites—Reddit, its formation and development of relationships within the platform, its dual role for charity, prosocial causes and further marginalization of women and minority groups. The author’s ethnography method has a big advantage of capturing Reddit community actions in real time. Overall, this is a solid booklength treatment of a dynamic social networking site.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Booknotes Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Booknotes Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Booknotes Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10948007.2015.1099956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交流,围绕亲社会事业团结起来等等。另一方面,reddit用户经常会遇到暴徒心态,比如参与波士顿马拉松爆炸案和“令人尴尬”的帖子。第4章详细介绍了新手Reddit成员成为成熟的Reddit用户的社会化过程,以及这种状态的变化对他们与Reddit社区的关系意味着什么。它还详细说明了对默认子Reddit的轻蔑态度,以及Reddit社区对Reddiquette(非正式的Reddit社区规则)的不同看法。第五章讨论了reddit用户在平台上幽默、聪明和严肃的表达方式。它详细介绍了Reddit平台如何支持从表情包到新奇账户到反应动图的创新表达,以及Reddit用户如何重视有意义的贡献,并嘲笑重复的“垃圾发帖”和“karmawhoring”。第六章讨论了Reddit话语中进一步边缘化女性和少数群体的阴暗面,比如“男性凝视”和排斥女性和少数群体的极客男子气概。第7章总结了本书的研究结果,将它们置于Reddit平台政治和参与性文化的更广泛背景下,并为这一领域的未来研究提出了可能的方向。Reddit作为一个内容和转发分享的社交网站,已经被证明有能力形成各种在线社区。我惊讶地发现,这本书对社会资本和公民参与这两个重要概念只做了敷衍的处理。虽然它顺便提到了“回音室”,但它并没有充分涵盖另一个重要的研究领域,即社交网站上的选择性暴露和两极分化。尽管已经提到了局限性,但这本书可以说是第一本填补学术空白的书,它研究了社交网站reddit,它在平台内关系的形成和发展,它在慈善、亲社会事业和进一步边缘化妇女和少数群体方面的双重角色。作者的人种志方法在实时捕捉Reddit社区活动方面有很大的优势。总的来说,这是一本关于动态社交网站的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2. Longer Single Book Reviews
exchanges, rallying around prosocial causes, etc. On the other hand, Redditors often come across harboring the mob mentality such as involvement in the Boston Marathon Bombing and the ‘‘cringeworthy’’ postings. Chapter 4 details the socialization process of novice Reddit members becoming full-fledged Redditors and what this status change means for their relationship with the Reddit community at large. It also details the scornful attitude toward default subreddits and the varied ways Reddiquette (informal Reddit community rules) is viewed in the Reddit community. Chapter 5 concerns both the humorously clever and serious ways Redditors express themselves in the platform. It details how the Reddit platform features enable innovative expressions from memes to novelty accounts to reaction GIFs and how Redditors value meaningful contributions and ridicule repetitive ‘‘shitposting’’ and ‘‘karmawhoring.’’ Chapter 6 addresses the dark side of Reddit discourse that further marginalizes women and minority groups such as ‘‘male gaze’’ and geek masculinity that excludes women and minority groups. Chapter 7 concludes the book by providing a summary of findings, situating them in a broader context of Reddit platform politics and participatory culture, and suggesting possible directions for future research in this area. Reddit as a content and repost sharing social networking site has been documented in having the ability to form various online communities. I am surprised to find the book only gives passing treatment of the important concepts of social capital and civic engagement. It does not adequately cover another important research domain in selective exposure and polarization on social networking sites though it mentions ‘‘echo chamber’’ in passing. Despite the limitations already mentioned, the book is arguably the first to fill a scholarly void by examining one of the social networking sites—Reddit, its formation and development of relationships within the platform, its dual role for charity, prosocial causes and further marginalization of women and minority groups. The author’s ethnography method has a big advantage of capturing Reddit community actions in real time. Overall, this is a solid booklength treatment of a dynamic social networking site.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Booknotes Quarterly
Communication Booknotes Quarterly Social Sciences-Communication
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Author Index for Volume 52: 2021 Looking Back (and Forward): Some COVID-19 Pandemic After-Effects on Books and Publishing Changing Horizons for CBQ Title Index for Volume 52: 2021 CBQ BOOKNOTES Condensed Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1