17世纪西班牙加勒比海作为全球的十字路口:跨帝国和跨地区的方法

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Colonial Latin American Review Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10609164.2023.2170549
David Wheat, Ida Altman
{"title":"17世纪西班牙加勒比海作为全球的十字路口:跨帝国和跨地区的方法","authors":"David Wheat, Ida Altman","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2170549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical scholarship on the seventeenth-century Caribbean generally has focused on the rise of Dutch, English, and French settlements in the region and commercial export agriculture, especially the cultivation of sugar using enslaved African labor. From the vantage point of the Spanish Caribbean, however, the seventeenth century looks quite different. In theGreaterAntilles, on the Isthmus of Panama, and along theCaribbean’s southern littoral Spanish towns, the majority of them ports, had been established a century or more earlier (Altman 2021; Díaz Ceballos 2020). Initially mostly oriented to serving extractive enterprises such asmining and sugar cultivation (Gelpí Baíz 2000; Sued Badillo 2001; Rodríguez Morel 2012) and shipping livestock and provisions, Caribbean port towns became part of an active, sprawling maritime network serving local, regional, and transatlantic economies. Spanish expansion in theCaribbeanduring the 1490s and early 1500s dependedheavily on the subjugation and incorporation of Indigenous societies, with diverse responses from Amerindian communities, including sustained resistance (Mena García 2011; Farnsworth 2019; Stone 2021). Along with violence and the demands of Spanish colonialism, epidemic disease took a notoriously steep toll on Indigenous populations (Henige 1998; Livi-Bacci 2003), while ostensibly ‘Spanish’ society, particularly outside of urban areas, became increasingly ethnically mixed with a strong Indigenous component (Schwartz 1997; Altman 2013). During the 1560s or 1570s—at least half a century before northern Europeans began to establish permanent footholds in the region—Spanish activities in the Caribbean entered a second phase with the consolidation of the Indies fleets, and Havana and Cartagena de Indias overtook Santo Domingo as leading centers of trade (Vidal Ortega 2002; Fuente et al. 2008). By the late sixteenth century, sugar production inHispaniola and Puerto Rico had declined significantly while ranching, farming, regional commerce, and in some cases mining came to predominate in colonial Spanish Caribbean economies (Abello Vives and Bassi Arévalo 2006; Giusti-Cordero 2009; Cromwell 2014; Stark 2015). Perhaps the most dramatic event separating the sixteenth century from the seventeenth was the forced depopulation of western Hispaniola in 1604–1606, along with other draconian measures designed to stem unregulated trade and enforce Crown control (Ponce Vázquez 2020). In short, while scholarship on areas settled or seized by northern European powers tends to treat the seventeenth century as a natural chronological starting point, historical analysis of the SpanishCaribbean during the 1600s provides an","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The seventeenth-century Spanish Caribbean as global crossroads: transimperial and transregional approaches\",\"authors\":\"David Wheat, Ida Altman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10609164.2023.2170549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historical scholarship on the seventeenth-century Caribbean generally has focused on the rise of Dutch, English, and French settlements in the region and commercial export agriculture, especially the cultivation of sugar using enslaved African labor. From the vantage point of the Spanish Caribbean, however, the seventeenth century looks quite different. In theGreaterAntilles, on the Isthmus of Panama, and along theCaribbean’s southern littoral Spanish towns, the majority of them ports, had been established a century or more earlier (Altman 2021; Díaz Ceballos 2020). Initially mostly oriented to serving extractive enterprises such asmining and sugar cultivation (Gelpí Baíz 2000; Sued Badillo 2001; Rodríguez Morel 2012) and shipping livestock and provisions, Caribbean port towns became part of an active, sprawling maritime network serving local, regional, and transatlantic economies. Spanish expansion in theCaribbeanduring the 1490s and early 1500s dependedheavily on the subjugation and incorporation of Indigenous societies, with diverse responses from Amerindian communities, including sustained resistance (Mena García 2011; Farnsworth 2019; Stone 2021). Along with violence and the demands of Spanish colonialism, epidemic disease took a notoriously steep toll on Indigenous populations (Henige 1998; Livi-Bacci 2003), while ostensibly ‘Spanish’ society, particularly outside of urban areas, became increasingly ethnically mixed with a strong Indigenous component (Schwartz 1997; Altman 2013). During the 1560s or 1570s—at least half a century before northern Europeans began to establish permanent footholds in the region—Spanish activities in the Caribbean entered a second phase with the consolidation of the Indies fleets, and Havana and Cartagena de Indias overtook Santo Domingo as leading centers of trade (Vidal Ortega 2002; Fuente et al. 2008). By the late sixteenth century, sugar production inHispaniola and Puerto Rico had declined significantly while ranching, farming, regional commerce, and in some cases mining came to predominate in colonial Spanish Caribbean economies (Abello Vives and Bassi Arévalo 2006; Giusti-Cordero 2009; Cromwell 2014; Stark 2015). Perhaps the most dramatic event separating the sixteenth century from the seventeenth was the forced depopulation of western Hispaniola in 1604–1606, along with other draconian measures designed to stem unregulated trade and enforce Crown control (Ponce Vázquez 2020). In short, while scholarship on areas settled or seized by northern European powers tends to treat the seventeenth century as a natural chronological starting point, historical analysis of the SpanishCaribbean during the 1600s provides an\",\"PeriodicalId\":44336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2170549\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colonial Latin American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2170549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于17世纪加勒比地区的历史研究通常集中在荷兰、英国和法国在该地区的定居点和商业出口农业的兴起上,特别是使用非洲奴隶劳动力种植糖。然而,从西班牙加勒比海的有利位置来看,17世纪看起来完全不同。在巴拿马地峡的大安的列斯群岛,以及沿加勒比海南部沿海的西班牙城镇,其中大多数是港口,早在一个世纪或更早之前就建立起来了(奥特曼2021;Díaz Ceballos 2020)。最初主要面向服务采掘企业,如采矿和糖种植(Gelpí Baíz 2000;2001年起诉巴迪洛;Rodríguez Morel 2012)和运输牲畜和粮食,加勒比港口城镇成为一个活跃的、庞大的海事网络的一部分,为地方、区域和跨大西洋经济服务。西班牙在1490年代和1500s早期在加勒比地区的扩张在很大程度上依赖于对土著社会的征服和合并,美洲印第安人社区的不同反应,包括持续的抵抗(Mena García 2011;法恩斯沃思2019;石2021)。随着暴力和西班牙殖民主义的需求,流行病给土著人口造成了臭名昭著的严重损失(Henige, 1998;Livi-Bacci 2003),虽然表面上是“西班牙”社会,特别是在城市地区之外,越来越多的种族混合与强大的土著成分(Schwartz 1997;奥特曼2013)。在16世纪60年代或15世纪70年代——至少在北欧人开始在该地区建立永久立足点的半个世纪之前——西班牙在加勒比地区的活动随着印度舰队的巩固进入了第二阶段,哈瓦那和卡塔赫纳德印度取代圣多明各成为主要的贸易中心(维达尔奥尔特加2002;Fuente et al. 2008)。到16世纪后期,伊斯帕尼奥拉岛和波多黎各的糖产量显著下降,而牧场、农业、区域商业和在某些情况下采矿在殖民地西班牙加勒比经济中占主导地位(Abello Vives和Bassi arsamuvalo 2006;Giusti-Cordero 2009;克伦威尔2014;鲜明的2015)。也许将16世纪与17世纪分开的最戏剧性的事件是1604-1606年伊斯帕尼奥拉岛西部的强制人口减少,以及其他旨在阻止不受管制的贸易和加强王室控制的严厉措施(Ponce Vázquez 2020)。简而言之,研究北欧列强定居或占领地区的学者倾向于将17世纪作为一个自然的时间起点,而对17世纪西班牙裔加勒比地区的历史分析则提供了一个历史起点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The seventeenth-century Spanish Caribbean as global crossroads: transimperial and transregional approaches
Historical scholarship on the seventeenth-century Caribbean generally has focused on the rise of Dutch, English, and French settlements in the region and commercial export agriculture, especially the cultivation of sugar using enslaved African labor. From the vantage point of the Spanish Caribbean, however, the seventeenth century looks quite different. In theGreaterAntilles, on the Isthmus of Panama, and along theCaribbean’s southern littoral Spanish towns, the majority of them ports, had been established a century or more earlier (Altman 2021; Díaz Ceballos 2020). Initially mostly oriented to serving extractive enterprises such asmining and sugar cultivation (Gelpí Baíz 2000; Sued Badillo 2001; Rodríguez Morel 2012) and shipping livestock and provisions, Caribbean port towns became part of an active, sprawling maritime network serving local, regional, and transatlantic economies. Spanish expansion in theCaribbeanduring the 1490s and early 1500s dependedheavily on the subjugation and incorporation of Indigenous societies, with diverse responses from Amerindian communities, including sustained resistance (Mena García 2011; Farnsworth 2019; Stone 2021). Along with violence and the demands of Spanish colonialism, epidemic disease took a notoriously steep toll on Indigenous populations (Henige 1998; Livi-Bacci 2003), while ostensibly ‘Spanish’ society, particularly outside of urban areas, became increasingly ethnically mixed with a strong Indigenous component (Schwartz 1997; Altman 2013). During the 1560s or 1570s—at least half a century before northern Europeans began to establish permanent footholds in the region—Spanish activities in the Caribbean entered a second phase with the consolidation of the Indies fleets, and Havana and Cartagena de Indias overtook Santo Domingo as leading centers of trade (Vidal Ortega 2002; Fuente et al. 2008). By the late sixteenth century, sugar production inHispaniola and Puerto Rico had declined significantly while ranching, farming, regional commerce, and in some cases mining came to predominate in colonial Spanish Caribbean economies (Abello Vives and Bassi Arévalo 2006; Giusti-Cordero 2009; Cromwell 2014; Stark 2015). Perhaps the most dramatic event separating the sixteenth century from the seventeenth was the forced depopulation of western Hispaniola in 1604–1606, along with other draconian measures designed to stem unregulated trade and enforce Crown control (Ponce Vázquez 2020). In short, while scholarship on areas settled or seized by northern European powers tends to treat the seventeenth century as a natural chronological starting point, historical analysis of the SpanishCaribbean during the 1600s provides an
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Colonial Latin American Review (CLAR) is a unique interdisciplinary journal devoted to the study of the colonial period in Latin America. The journal was created in 1992, in response to the growing scholarly interest in colonial themes related to the Quincentenary. CLAR offers a critical forum where scholars can exchange ideas, revise traditional areas of inquiry and chart new directions of research. With the conviction that this dialogue will enrich the emerging field of Latin American colonial studies, CLAR offers a variety of scholarly approaches and formats, including articles, debates, review-essays and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Devouring the empire: the Pijaos’ anticolonial project in the sixteenth-century northern Andes The conquest of Mexico: 500 years of reinventions Las reelaboraciones del denominado Manual del christiano de fray Bernardino de Sahagún en dos nuevos manuscritos: BCT 35-22, Montejano 2 The fame of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz: posthumous fashioning in the early modern Hispanic word Adrift on an inland sea: misinformation and the limits of empire in the Brazilian backlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1