神经反馈训练在帕金森病治疗中的评价:一项初步研究

Cordelia Erickson‐Davis, John Anderson, C. Wielinski, S. Richter, S. Parashos
{"title":"神经反馈训练在帕金森病治疗中的评价:一项初步研究","authors":"Cordelia Erickson‐Davis, John Anderson, C. Wielinski, S. Richter, S. Parashos","doi":"10.1080/10874208.2012.650109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assess the effects of EEG biofeedback training on levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using a sham feedback controlled study design. Nine subjects were randomized into either a treatment group or control group and underwent 24 sessions of either active feedback training or sham feedback. The training protocol aimed at increasing 8–15 Hz activity while inhibiting excess 4–8 Hz and 23–34 Hz activity at the C3-C4 derivation. There were no statistically significant differences baseline to post-active neurofeedback training as compared to sham feedback training in primary outcome measures assessing change in dyskinesia severity, nor in secondary outcome measures assessing change in clinical features of PD. Nonsignificant trends were observed in subjects’ PD home diaries indicating a decrease in the severity of motor fluctuations. Baseline to post-training comparisons of secondary outcome measures in quantitative EEG analysis showed significant interaction effects with...","PeriodicalId":88271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotherapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"4-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874208.2012.650109","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Neurofeedback Training in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Cordelia Erickson‐Davis, John Anderson, C. Wielinski, S. Richter, S. Parashos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10874208.2012.650109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We assess the effects of EEG biofeedback training on levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using a sham feedback controlled study design. Nine subjects were randomized into either a treatment group or control group and underwent 24 sessions of either active feedback training or sham feedback. The training protocol aimed at increasing 8–15 Hz activity while inhibiting excess 4–8 Hz and 23–34 Hz activity at the C3-C4 derivation. There were no statistically significant differences baseline to post-active neurofeedback training as compared to sham feedback training in primary outcome measures assessing change in dyskinesia severity, nor in secondary outcome measures assessing change in clinical features of PD. Nonsignificant trends were observed in subjects’ PD home diaries indicating a decrease in the severity of motor fluctuations. Baseline to post-training comparisons of secondary outcome measures in quantitative EEG analysis showed significant interaction effects with...\",\"PeriodicalId\":88271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotherapy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"4-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874208.2012.650109\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2012.650109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2012.650109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们采用假反馈对照研究设计评估脑电图生物反馈训练对帕金森病(PD)患者左旋多巴诱导的运动障碍(LID)的影响。9名受试者被随机分为治疗组和对照组,并接受了24次主动反馈训练和虚假反馈训练。训练方案旨在增加8-15 Hz的活性,同时抑制C3-C4衍生物过量的4-8 Hz和23-34 Hz的活性。与假反馈训练相比,活动后神经反馈训练基线在评估运动障碍严重程度变化的主要结局指标上没有统计学差异,在评估PD临床特征变化的次要结局指标上也没有统计学差异。在受试者的PD家庭日记中观察到的无显著趋势表明运动波动的严重程度有所下降。定量脑电图分析的次要结局指标基线与训练后比较显示,与…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Neurofeedback Training in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study
We assess the effects of EEG biofeedback training on levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using a sham feedback controlled study design. Nine subjects were randomized into either a treatment group or control group and underwent 24 sessions of either active feedback training or sham feedback. The training protocol aimed at increasing 8–15 Hz activity while inhibiting excess 4–8 Hz and 23–34 Hz activity at the C3-C4 derivation. There were no statistically significant differences baseline to post-active neurofeedback training as compared to sham feedback training in primary outcome measures assessing change in dyskinesia severity, nor in secondary outcome measures assessing change in clinical features of PD. Nonsignificant trends were observed in subjects’ PD home diaries indicating a decrease in the severity of motor fluctuations. Baseline to post-training comparisons of secondary outcome measures in quantitative EEG analysis showed significant interaction effects with...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields Book review: The Art of Artifacting Summaries and Abstracts of Scientific Papers Presented at the 2002 Society for Neuronal Regulation 10th Annual Conference, Scottsdale, Arizona Poster Presentation Abstracts Published online Book Review: Handbook of Mind-Body Medicine for Primary Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1