学术资本主义与创业型大学:“发展”的新范式

Q1 Arts and Humanities Open Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23265507.2014.964645
Ourania Filippakou, Gareth Williams
{"title":"学术资本主义与创业型大学:“发展”的新范式","authors":"Ourania Filippakou, Gareth Williams","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2014.964645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The interest of higher education researchers in entrepreneurialism in European universities began in the late 1990s with the appearance of two path-breaking books: Sheila Slaughter and Larry Leslie on Academic Capitalism and Burton Clark on Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Since that time ‘entrepreneurial’ has become a popular term to describe what many people, politicians in particular, believe is necessary for university survival, and indeed economic survival, as the new paradigm of development. Drawing mostly from a three-year comparative study undertaken as part of the European Framework social science research programme, this article explores whether this new paradigm of ‘development’ is a contingent result of the huge expansion of higher education in the previous quarter century or whether it is primarily the result of ideological changes which have led to the current global dominance of neo-liberalism. The view we have attempted to put forward is the latter. The article deploys ideas and research from governmentality theory to suggest some limitations of the use of empirical data in current higher education policy research and some ways of thinking differently about entrepreneurialism and Clark's ‘pathways of transformation’ to the universities he studied. The article offers a short example of the useful work that social theory can do in relation to policy agendas like university entrepreneurialism which often lie unproblematized within higher policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2014.964645","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurial Universities as a New Paradigm of ‘Development’\",\"authors\":\"Ourania Filippakou, Gareth Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23265507.2014.964645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The interest of higher education researchers in entrepreneurialism in European universities began in the late 1990s with the appearance of two path-breaking books: Sheila Slaughter and Larry Leslie on Academic Capitalism and Burton Clark on Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Since that time ‘entrepreneurial’ has become a popular term to describe what many people, politicians in particular, believe is necessary for university survival, and indeed economic survival, as the new paradigm of development. Drawing mostly from a three-year comparative study undertaken as part of the European Framework social science research programme, this article explores whether this new paradigm of ‘development’ is a contingent result of the huge expansion of higher education in the previous quarter century or whether it is primarily the result of ideological changes which have led to the current global dominance of neo-liberalism. The view we have attempted to put forward is the latter. The article deploys ideas and research from governmentality theory to suggest some limitations of the use of empirical data in current higher education policy research and some ways of thinking differently about entrepreneurialism and Clark's ‘pathways of transformation’ to the universities he studied. The article offers a short example of the useful work that social theory can do in relation to policy agendas like university entrepreneurialism which often lie unproblematized within higher policy and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Review of Educational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2014.964645\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Review of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.964645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.964645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

欧洲大学的高等教育研究者对创业主义的兴趣始于20世纪90年代末,当时出现了两本开创性的著作:希拉·斯劳特和拉里·莱斯利的《学术资本主义》和伯顿·克拉克的《创建创业型大学》。从那时起,“创业”已经成为一个流行的术语,用来描述许多人,尤其是政治家,认为这是大学生存所必需的,实际上是经济生存所必需的,作为发展的新范式。作为欧洲框架社会科学研究计划的一部分,本文主要从一项为期三年的比较研究中得出结论,探讨这种新的“发展”范式是前25年高等教育大规模扩张的偶然结果,还是主要是导致当前新自由主义在全球占主导地位的意识形态变化的结果。我们试图提出的观点是后者。本文运用治理理论的思想和研究,提出了当前高等教育政策研究中使用经验数据的一些局限性,以及对企业家精神和克拉克对他所研究的大学的“转型之路”的一些不同思考方式。这篇文章提供了一个简短的例子,说明社会理论在与政策议程(如大学创业主义)相关的有用工作中可以做的工作,这通常是在更高的政策和实践中没有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurial Universities as a New Paradigm of ‘Development’
Abstract The interest of higher education researchers in entrepreneurialism in European universities began in the late 1990s with the appearance of two path-breaking books: Sheila Slaughter and Larry Leslie on Academic Capitalism and Burton Clark on Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Since that time ‘entrepreneurial’ has become a popular term to describe what many people, politicians in particular, believe is necessary for university survival, and indeed economic survival, as the new paradigm of development. Drawing mostly from a three-year comparative study undertaken as part of the European Framework social science research programme, this article explores whether this new paradigm of ‘development’ is a contingent result of the huge expansion of higher education in the previous quarter century or whether it is primarily the result of ideological changes which have led to the current global dominance of neo-liberalism. The view we have attempted to put forward is the latter. The article deploys ideas and research from governmentality theory to suggest some limitations of the use of empirical data in current higher education policy research and some ways of thinking differently about entrepreneurialism and Clark's ‘pathways of transformation’ to the universities he studied. The article offers a short example of the useful work that social theory can do in relation to policy agendas like university entrepreneurialism which often lie unproblematized within higher policy and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Review of Educational Research
Open Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experimenting with academic subjectivity: collective writing, peer production and collective intelligence What’s In a game? A game-based approach to exploring 21st-century European identity and values How to integrate addiction medicine in psychiatry training: results of an experiment with two educational methods Is peer review in academic publishing still working?* Love, attention and teaching: Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1