早期子宫内膜癌的淋巴血管浸润:辅助治疗和复发模式

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology Pub Date : 2016-04-07 DOI:10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708
E. van Barneveld, D. Allen, R. Bekkers, P. Grant
{"title":"早期子宫内膜癌的淋巴血管浸润:辅助治疗和复发模式","authors":"E. van Barneveld, D. Allen, R. Bekkers, P. Grant","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In early-stage endometrial cancer, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an independent predictor of relapse of disease and poorer survival. Nevertheless, adjuvant treatment for LVSI-positive patients is variable. Methods: Early-stage endometrial cancer patients with LVSI, treated in Melbourne between 2000 and 2010, were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of patients observed after hysterectomy were compared with those who had had adjuvant EBRT or VBT. Results: A total of 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. After surgery, 40 patients were observed, 48 patients received adjuvant EBRT and 7 adjuvant VBT. Nineteen patients developed recurrent disease (20.0%), of which 12.5% were in the observation group, 27.1% in the EBRT group and 14.3% in the VBT group (p-value 0.217). Fewer vaginal recurrences and more distant recurrences were found in both the RT groups (p-value 0.636 and 0.648 respectively). Multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS) revealed a non-significant decrease of hazards in both the radiotherapy (RT) groups when compared with the observation group. Conclusions: In patients with LVSI, adjuvant RT was not shown to reduce recurrence rates or improve OS or CRS. Previous reports have suggested that LVSI may be as important as nodal status for the risk of distant recurrence, therefore the use of systemic therapy should be further investigated.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"8 1","pages":"18 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage endometrial cancer: adjuvant treatment and patterns of recurrence\",\"authors\":\"E. van Barneveld, D. Allen, R. Bekkers, P. Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In early-stage endometrial cancer, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an independent predictor of relapse of disease and poorer survival. Nevertheless, adjuvant treatment for LVSI-positive patients is variable. Methods: Early-stage endometrial cancer patients with LVSI, treated in Melbourne between 2000 and 2010, were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of patients observed after hysterectomy were compared with those who had had adjuvant EBRT or VBT. Results: A total of 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. After surgery, 40 patients were observed, 48 patients received adjuvant EBRT and 7 adjuvant VBT. Nineteen patients developed recurrent disease (20.0%), of which 12.5% were in the observation group, 27.1% in the EBRT group and 14.3% in the VBT group (p-value 0.217). Fewer vaginal recurrences and more distant recurrences were found in both the RT groups (p-value 0.636 and 0.648 respectively). Multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS) revealed a non-significant decrease of hazards in both the radiotherapy (RT) groups when compared with the observation group. Conclusions: In patients with LVSI, adjuvant RT was not shown to reduce recurrence rates or improve OS or CRS. Previous reports have suggested that LVSI may be as important as nodal status for the risk of distant recurrence, therefore the use of systemic therapy should be further investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2016.1175708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在早期子宫内膜癌中,淋巴血管腔浸润(LVSI)是疾病复发和较差生存率的独立预测因子。然而,lvsi阳性患者的辅助治疗是可变的。方法:对2000 ~ 2010年在墨尔本接受LVSI治疗的早期子宫内膜癌患者进行回顾性分析。将子宫切除术后观察到的患者的结果与辅助EBRT或VBT的患者进行比较。结果:95例患者符合纳入标准。术后观察40例患者,48例接受辅助EBRT, 7例接受辅助VBT。19例患者出现复发(20.0%),其中观察组12.5%,EBRT组27.1%,VBT组14.3% (p值0.217)。两组患者阴道复发较少,远处复发较多(p值分别为0.636和0.648)。对总生存期(OS)和癌症相关生存期(CRS)的多变量分析显示,与观察组相比,两组放疗(RT)的危害均无显著降低。结论:在LVSI患者中,辅助RT并未显示出降低复发率或改善OS或CRS的效果。先前的报道表明LVSI可能与淋巴结状态对远处复发的风险同样重要,因此应该进一步研究全身治疗的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage endometrial cancer: adjuvant treatment and patterns of recurrence
Background: In early-stage endometrial cancer, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an independent predictor of relapse of disease and poorer survival. Nevertheless, adjuvant treatment for LVSI-positive patients is variable. Methods: Early-stage endometrial cancer patients with LVSI, treated in Melbourne between 2000 and 2010, were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of patients observed after hysterectomy were compared with those who had had adjuvant EBRT or VBT. Results: A total of 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. After surgery, 40 patients were observed, 48 patients received adjuvant EBRT and 7 adjuvant VBT. Nineteen patients developed recurrent disease (20.0%), of which 12.5% were in the observation group, 27.1% in the EBRT group and 14.3% in the VBT group (p-value 0.217). Fewer vaginal recurrences and more distant recurrences were found in both the RT groups (p-value 0.636 and 0.648 respectively). Multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS) revealed a non-significant decrease of hazards in both the radiotherapy (RT) groups when compared with the observation group. Conclusions: In patients with LVSI, adjuvant RT was not shown to reduce recurrence rates or improve OS or CRS. Previous reports have suggested that LVSI may be as important as nodal status for the risk of distant recurrence, therefore the use of systemic therapy should be further investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retrospective review of 37.4 Gy in 11 fractions for the palliation of advanced cervical cancer Challenges managing women with suspected Lynch Syndrome in Zimbabwe: a case report A retrospective study comparing the efficiency of recurrent LSIL cytology to high-grade cytology as predictors of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+) A retrospective study of the epidemiology and histological subtypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection in carcinoma of the vulva: experience and intermediate results at one institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1