脑肿瘤患者健康相关生活质量:作为临床试验终点及其临床护理价值

L. Dirven, J. Koekkoek, J. Reijneveld, M. Taphoorn
{"title":"脑肿瘤患者健康相关生活质量:作为临床试验终点及其临床护理价值","authors":"L. Dirven, J. Koekkoek, J. Reijneveld, M. Taphoorn","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2016.1136793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) plays a role as a (secondary) endpoint in clinical trials for brain tumor patients as well as in daily clinical practice. HRQoL can be classified as a patient-centered endpoint, assessing a direct clinical benefit for the patient. Although HRQoL is a meaningful endpoint because it reflects the patient’s perspective, several methodological concerns raise doubt over the appropriateness of HRQoL as an endpoint in trials. HRQoL could possibly be considered as co-primary endpoint in future trial designs, together with a surrogate endpoint such as progression-free survival, to ensure that both a direct treatment effect and a direct clinical benefit for the patient will be assessed. Routine assessment of HRQoL has proven to be feasible in clinical practice and was found to facilitate the communication between patients and physicians. However, despite discussion of HRQoL issues, so far this did not have an impact on patient management and clinical decisions.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"37 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1136793","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-related quality of life in brain tumor patients: as an endpoint in clinical trials and its value in clinical care\",\"authors\":\"L. Dirven, J. Koekkoek, J. Reijneveld, M. Taphoorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23809000.2016.1136793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) plays a role as a (secondary) endpoint in clinical trials for brain tumor patients as well as in daily clinical practice. HRQoL can be classified as a patient-centered endpoint, assessing a direct clinical benefit for the patient. Although HRQoL is a meaningful endpoint because it reflects the patient’s perspective, several methodological concerns raise doubt over the appropriateness of HRQoL as an endpoint in trials. HRQoL could possibly be considered as co-primary endpoint in future trial designs, together with a surrogate endpoint such as progression-free survival, to ensure that both a direct treatment effect and a direct clinical benefit for the patient will be assessed. Routine assessment of HRQoL has proven to be feasible in clinical practice and was found to facilitate the communication between patients and physicians. However, despite discussion of HRQoL issues, so far this did not have an impact on patient management and clinical decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1136793\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1136793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1136793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)在脑肿瘤患者的临床试验和日常临床实践中扮演着(次要)终点的角色。HRQoL可归类为以患者为中心的终点,评估患者的直接临床获益。虽然HRQoL是一个有意义的终点,因为它反映了患者的观点,但一些方法学上的问题对HRQoL作为试验终点的适宜性提出了质疑。在未来的试验设计中,HRQoL可能会被视为共同的主要终点,以及替代终点,如无进展生存期,以确保对患者的直接治疗效果和直接临床获益进行评估。HRQoL的常规评估在临床实践中已被证明是可行的,并被发现有助于患者与医生之间的沟通。然而,尽管讨论了HRQoL问题,但到目前为止,这还没有对患者管理和临床决策产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health-related quality of life in brain tumor patients: as an endpoint in clinical trials and its value in clinical care
ABSTRACT Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) plays a role as a (secondary) endpoint in clinical trials for brain tumor patients as well as in daily clinical practice. HRQoL can be classified as a patient-centered endpoint, assessing a direct clinical benefit for the patient. Although HRQoL is a meaningful endpoint because it reflects the patient’s perspective, several methodological concerns raise doubt over the appropriateness of HRQoL as an endpoint in trials. HRQoL could possibly be considered as co-primary endpoint in future trial designs, together with a surrogate endpoint such as progression-free survival, to ensure that both a direct treatment effect and a direct clinical benefit for the patient will be assessed. Routine assessment of HRQoL has proven to be feasible in clinical practice and was found to facilitate the communication between patients and physicians. However, despite discussion of HRQoL issues, so far this did not have an impact on patient management and clinical decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in people with cancer The supportive roles of spirituality and mindfulness in patients’ cancer journeys Physical activity and nutritional interventions and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: a review Fertility decision-making in cancer patients – current status and future directions Predicting survival of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1