倦怠员工是否更喜欢低努力绩效策略?

A. Dam, P. Eling, G. Keijsers, E. Becker
{"title":"倦怠员工是否更喜欢低努力绩效策略?","authors":"A. Dam, P. Eling, G. Keijsers, E. Becker","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2013.828666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Employees with burnout experience a persistent, negative work-related state of mind primarily characterized by exhaustion, decreased motivation, and a sense of reduced effectiveness. Although most employees with burnout (67%) were found to apply an efficient high-effort strategy like healthy controls, significantly more employees with burnout (33%) than healthy controls (8%) applied a low-effort strategy. However, the low-effort strategy used by a significant number of burnout employees does not seem to be an adaptive way of coping with fatigue but was rather the result of a structurally reduced motivation to expend effort and/or cognitive impairments. The majority of burnout employees appeared capable of performing tasks adequately and applying high-effort strategies, but they experience substantial distress during task performance. Employers may consider temporarily providing these employees with less-demanding tasks, as a reduction in stress may enable a normalization of relevant biological processes. A small group of employees with burnout did not appear to be able to adequately perform complex as well as simple tasks, and offering such employees a cognitive behavioral treatment program for burnout may be of merit. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Several studies have shown that fatigued individuals may adapt their task performance strategically. It is not known, though, whether such an adaptation is also applied by employees with burnout who suffer from long-term fatigue. Strategic adjustments can be achieved by applying simpler response strategies with lesser demands on working memory. Should employees with burnout employ these strategic adaptations to task performance, it would explain why burnout is accompanied by compromised executive functioning and not difficulties with more automatic cognitive processes. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether reduced cognitive performance in burnout could be explained by fatigue-related strategic adaptations of task performance. Methods: Forty employees with burnout and 40 healthy controls were presented with a task they could execute either by adopting an effective but high-effort strategy or by applying a less effective low-effort strategy. Results: Significantly more employees with burnout than healthy controls applied a low-effort strategy, even though the majority used a high-effort strategy. The employees with burnout that applied a low-effort strategy failed to maintain their performance level and reported high levels of fatigue, aversion, and effort. Conclusions: Employees with burnout do not appear to adjust their performance strategically as fatigued healthy employees do. Most employees with burnout applied a high-effort performance strategy despite high levels of distress, just like non-fatigued healthy controls. A minority of the employees with burnout applied a low-effort strategy and actually did not seem to try to perform even the simple tasks. Their inferior performance seems to be the result of a structural reduced motivation to spend effort and/or cognitive impairments.","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"1 1","pages":"190 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2013.828666","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Employees with Burnout Prefer Low-Effort Performance Strategies?\",\"authors\":\"A. Dam, P. Eling, G. Keijsers, E. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21577323.2013.828666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Employees with burnout experience a persistent, negative work-related state of mind primarily characterized by exhaustion, decreased motivation, and a sense of reduced effectiveness. Although most employees with burnout (67%) were found to apply an efficient high-effort strategy like healthy controls, significantly more employees with burnout (33%) than healthy controls (8%) applied a low-effort strategy. However, the low-effort strategy used by a significant number of burnout employees does not seem to be an adaptive way of coping with fatigue but was rather the result of a structurally reduced motivation to expend effort and/or cognitive impairments. The majority of burnout employees appeared capable of performing tasks adequately and applying high-effort strategies, but they experience substantial distress during task performance. Employers may consider temporarily providing these employees with less-demanding tasks, as a reduction in stress may enable a normalization of relevant biological processes. A small group of employees with burnout did not appear to be able to adequately perform complex as well as simple tasks, and offering such employees a cognitive behavioral treatment program for burnout may be of merit. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Several studies have shown that fatigued individuals may adapt their task performance strategically. It is not known, though, whether such an adaptation is also applied by employees with burnout who suffer from long-term fatigue. Strategic adjustments can be achieved by applying simpler response strategies with lesser demands on working memory. Should employees with burnout employ these strategic adaptations to task performance, it would explain why burnout is accompanied by compromised executive functioning and not difficulties with more automatic cognitive processes. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether reduced cognitive performance in burnout could be explained by fatigue-related strategic adaptations of task performance. Methods: Forty employees with burnout and 40 healthy controls were presented with a task they could execute either by adopting an effective but high-effort strategy or by applying a less effective low-effort strategy. Results: Significantly more employees with burnout than healthy controls applied a low-effort strategy, even though the majority used a high-effort strategy. The employees with burnout that applied a low-effort strategy failed to maintain their performance level and reported high levels of fatigue, aversion, and effort. Conclusions: Employees with burnout do not appear to adjust their performance strategically as fatigued healthy employees do. Most employees with burnout applied a high-effort performance strategy despite high levels of distress, just like non-fatigued healthy controls. A minority of the employees with burnout applied a low-effort strategy and actually did not seem to try to perform even the simple tasks. Their inferior performance seems to be the result of a structural reduced motivation to spend effort and/or cognitive impairments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2013.828666\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2013.828666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2013.828666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

职业倦怠的员工会经历一种持续的、消极的与工作有关的精神状态,主要表现为疲惫、动力下降和效率降低。尽管大多数倦怠的员工(67%)采用了高效的高努力策略,比如健康对照组,但与健康对照组(8%)相比,倦怠的员工(33%)明显更多地采用了低努力策略。然而,大量精疲力竭的员工所使用的低努力策略似乎并不是一种应对疲劳的适应性方法,而是结构性地减少了付出努力的动机和/或认知障碍的结果。大多数倦怠员工似乎能够充分地执行任务并采用高努力策略,但他们在任务执行过程中经历了实质性的痛苦。雇主可以考虑暂时为这些雇员提供要求较低的任务,因为压力的减少可能使相关的生物过程正常化。一小部分有过劳的员工似乎不能充分地完成复杂和简单的任务,为这些员工提供一种针对过劳的认知行为治疗方案可能是有益的。技术摘要背景:一些研究表明,疲劳的个体可以策略性地调整他们的任务绩效。然而,目前尚不清楚这种适应是否也适用于长期疲劳的倦怠员工。策略调整可以通过应用对工作记忆要求较低的更简单的反应策略来实现。如果倦怠的员工采用这些策略适应任务表现,这就解释了为什么倦怠伴随着执行功能受损,而不是更自动的认知过程困难。目的:本研究的目的是探讨疲劳相关的任务绩效策略适应是否可以解释职业倦怠导致的认知绩效下降。方法:对40名职业倦怠员工和40名健康对照者进行研究,分别采用有效的高努力策略和效率较低的低努力策略来执行任务。结果:与健康对照组相比,有更多的倦怠员工采用了低努力策略,尽管大多数员工采用了高努力策略。采用低努力策略的倦怠员工未能维持他们的绩效水平,并且报告了高水平的疲劳,厌恶和努力。结论:倦怠的员工不像疲劳的健康员工那样有策略地调整他们的绩效。大多数精疲力竭的员工在极度痛苦的情况下仍然采用了高度努力的绩效策略,就像没有疲劳的健康对照组一样。少数精疲力竭的员工采用了低努力策略,甚至连简单的任务都不去做。他们较差的表现似乎是由于结构性的努力动机减少和/或认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Employees with Burnout Prefer Low-Effort Performance Strategies?
OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Employees with burnout experience a persistent, negative work-related state of mind primarily characterized by exhaustion, decreased motivation, and a sense of reduced effectiveness. Although most employees with burnout (67%) were found to apply an efficient high-effort strategy like healthy controls, significantly more employees with burnout (33%) than healthy controls (8%) applied a low-effort strategy. However, the low-effort strategy used by a significant number of burnout employees does not seem to be an adaptive way of coping with fatigue but was rather the result of a structurally reduced motivation to expend effort and/or cognitive impairments. The majority of burnout employees appeared capable of performing tasks adequately and applying high-effort strategies, but they experience substantial distress during task performance. Employers may consider temporarily providing these employees with less-demanding tasks, as a reduction in stress may enable a normalization of relevant biological processes. A small group of employees with burnout did not appear to be able to adequately perform complex as well as simple tasks, and offering such employees a cognitive behavioral treatment program for burnout may be of merit. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Several studies have shown that fatigued individuals may adapt their task performance strategically. It is not known, though, whether such an adaptation is also applied by employees with burnout who suffer from long-term fatigue. Strategic adjustments can be achieved by applying simpler response strategies with lesser demands on working memory. Should employees with burnout employ these strategic adaptations to task performance, it would explain why burnout is accompanied by compromised executive functioning and not difficulties with more automatic cognitive processes. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether reduced cognitive performance in burnout could be explained by fatigue-related strategic adaptations of task performance. Methods: Forty employees with burnout and 40 healthy controls were presented with a task they could execute either by adopting an effective but high-effort strategy or by applying a less effective low-effort strategy. Results: Significantly more employees with burnout than healthy controls applied a low-effort strategy, even though the majority used a high-effort strategy. The employees with burnout that applied a low-effort strategy failed to maintain their performance level and reported high levels of fatigue, aversion, and effort. Conclusions: Employees with burnout do not appear to adjust their performance strategically as fatigued healthy employees do. Most employees with burnout applied a high-effort performance strategy despite high levels of distress, just like non-fatigued healthy controls. A minority of the employees with burnout applied a low-effort strategy and actually did not seem to try to perform even the simple tasks. Their inferior performance seems to be the result of a structural reduced motivation to spend effort and/or cognitive impairments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
End-of-Volume Editorial Board Muscle Activity and Posture Differences in the Sit and Stand Phases of Sit-to-Stand Workstation Use: A Comparison of Computer Configurations Augmented Reality “Smart Glasses” in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health Evaluation of Vibrotactile Warning Systems for Supporting Hazard Awareness and Safety of Distracted Pedestrians Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1