“3·11”后日本社会纪录片的伦理

M. Downing Roberts
{"title":"“3·11”后日本社会纪录片的伦理","authors":"M. Downing Roberts","doi":"10.1080/17564905.2019.1600699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the past eight years, independent documentary filmmakers in Japan have produced over one hundred works concerning the 3/11 disaster in Tōhoku. Since the controversy over Mori Tatsuya's film 311, the issue of documentary ethics has loomed large in the discussion of these films. Specifically: how may we understand the filmmaker's social and ethical responsibility in documenting a disaster such as 3/11? Despite the importance of this sensitive issue for audiences, it has received little scholarly attention. In this article, I analyse three exemplary films which are directly concerned with 3/11: Ōmiya Kōichi’s The Sketch of Mujō, Fujiwara Toshi's No Man’s Zone, and Funahashi Atsushi's Nuclear Nation. While all three films focus on the survivors of the disaster, each takes a distinctive approach: Ōmiya reflects on the interplay between impermanence [mujō] and collective memory; Fujiwara queries our presuppositions and place as spectators of disaster; and Funahashi explores the system of power that maintains the nuclear village. I propose an axiographic analysis of these films as a contribution to our understanding of the disaster, shedding light on not only the ethical stance of the filmmakers, but also on the mechanisms of the larger, mass-mediated image regime in contemporary Japan.","PeriodicalId":37898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema","volume":"11 1","pages":"68 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17564905.2019.1600699","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethics of Japanese Social Documentary in the Wake of 3/11\",\"authors\":\"M. Downing Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17564905.2019.1600699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Over the past eight years, independent documentary filmmakers in Japan have produced over one hundred works concerning the 3/11 disaster in Tōhoku. Since the controversy over Mori Tatsuya's film 311, the issue of documentary ethics has loomed large in the discussion of these films. Specifically: how may we understand the filmmaker's social and ethical responsibility in documenting a disaster such as 3/11? Despite the importance of this sensitive issue for audiences, it has received little scholarly attention. In this article, I analyse three exemplary films which are directly concerned with 3/11: Ōmiya Kōichi’s The Sketch of Mujō, Fujiwara Toshi's No Man’s Zone, and Funahashi Atsushi's Nuclear Nation. While all three films focus on the survivors of the disaster, each takes a distinctive approach: Ōmiya reflects on the interplay between impermanence [mujō] and collective memory; Fujiwara queries our presuppositions and place as spectators of disaster; and Funahashi explores the system of power that maintains the nuclear village. I propose an axiographic analysis of these films as a contribution to our understanding of the disaster, shedding light on not only the ethical stance of the filmmakers, but also on the mechanisms of the larger, mass-mediated image regime in contemporary Japan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"68 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17564905.2019.1600699\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17564905.2019.1600699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17564905.2019.1600699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的八年中,日本的独立纪录片制片人制作了一百多部关于Tōhoku 3/11灾难的作品。自森达也导演的电影《311》引发争议以来,纪录片伦理问题在这些电影的讨论中显得尤为突出。具体来说:我们如何理解电影制作人在记录3/11这样的灾难时所承担的社会和道德责任?尽管这一敏感问题对读者来说很重要,但学术界对它的关注却很少。在本文中,我分析了三部与3/11直接相关的典型电影:Ōmiya Kōichi的《无人区》,藤原敏的《无人区》和船桥敦的《核国家》。虽然这三部电影都聚焦于灾难的幸存者,但每部电影都采用了独特的方法:Ōmiya反映了无常与集体记忆之间的相互作用;藤原质疑我们作为灾难观众的预设和地位;船桥探索了维持核村的权力系统。我建议对这些电影进行轴向分析,以帮助我们理解这场灾难,不仅揭示了电影制作人的道德立场,还揭示了当代日本更大的、大众媒介的图像制度的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ethics of Japanese Social Documentary in the Wake of 3/11
ABSTRACT Over the past eight years, independent documentary filmmakers in Japan have produced over one hundred works concerning the 3/11 disaster in Tōhoku. Since the controversy over Mori Tatsuya's film 311, the issue of documentary ethics has loomed large in the discussion of these films. Specifically: how may we understand the filmmaker's social and ethical responsibility in documenting a disaster such as 3/11? Despite the importance of this sensitive issue for audiences, it has received little scholarly attention. In this article, I analyse three exemplary films which are directly concerned with 3/11: Ōmiya Kōichi’s The Sketch of Mujō, Fujiwara Toshi's No Man’s Zone, and Funahashi Atsushi's Nuclear Nation. While all three films focus on the survivors of the disaster, each takes a distinctive approach: Ōmiya reflects on the interplay between impermanence [mujō] and collective memory; Fujiwara queries our presuppositions and place as spectators of disaster; and Funahashi explores the system of power that maintains the nuclear village. I propose an axiographic analysis of these films as a contribution to our understanding of the disaster, shedding light on not only the ethical stance of the filmmakers, but also on the mechanisms of the larger, mass-mediated image regime in contemporary Japan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema
Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema is a fully refereed forum for the dissemination of scholarly work devoted to the cinemas of Japan and Korea and the interactions and relations between them. The increasingly transnational status of Japanese and Korean cinema underlines the need to deepen our understanding of this ever more globalized film-making region. Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema is a peer-reviewed journal. The peer review process is double blind. Detailed Instructions for Authors can be found here.
期刊最新文献
Rescuing film culture from the nation: Japanese cinema in South Korean cultural journalism of the 1980s and 1990s Still chasing reconciliation: the 2002 Japan–Korea co-productions of the television drama Friends and the opera Chun Hiang ‘Say my name’: Slam Dunk , the importation of manga in South Korea, and post-crisis nostalgia in East Asia Real pigs and fake humans: rethinking realism in Yeon Sang-ho’s ‘The King of Pigs’ and ‘The Fake’ A journey through the ‘Hosoda sphere’: digital worlds in Mamoru Hosoda’s animation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1