请愿条款与食品倡导

Q2 Social Sciences First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21689725.2014.888861
Michael S. Bruner, Laura K. Hahn, Nicola Sheldon
{"title":"请愿条款与食品倡导","authors":"Michael S. Bruner, Laura K. Hahn, Nicola Sheldon","doi":"10.1080/21689725.2014.888861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to petition is a rhetorically interesting but understudied portion of the First Amendment. Scholars and the lay public usually focus on freedom of speech as the key aspect of the First Amendment. While freedom of speech (expression) is an important topic, we argue that the right to petition also is a rich topic in communication studies, as it is linked to social advocacy and is an inherently interactive activity with potentially significant policy implications. This essay offers a definition of petition, touches on historical exemplars of petition, and presents a nine-part model of petition that is applied to California Proposition 37. The authors also discuss the unintended consequences of petition and emerging forms of petition, such as online petitions. In linking the Petition Clause to the growing field of Food Studies, the essay breaks some new ground and also promotes the conversation between the First Amendment scholars (and other communication scholars) and scholars from many fields.","PeriodicalId":37756,"journal":{"name":"First Amendment Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21689725.2014.888861","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Petition Clause and Food Advocacy\",\"authors\":\"Michael S. Bruner, Laura K. Hahn, Nicola Sheldon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21689725.2014.888861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The right to petition is a rhetorically interesting but understudied portion of the First Amendment. Scholars and the lay public usually focus on freedom of speech as the key aspect of the First Amendment. While freedom of speech (expression) is an important topic, we argue that the right to petition also is a rich topic in communication studies, as it is linked to social advocacy and is an inherently interactive activity with potentially significant policy implications. This essay offers a definition of petition, touches on historical exemplars of petition, and presents a nine-part model of petition that is applied to California Proposition 37. The authors also discuss the unintended consequences of petition and emerging forms of petition, such as online petitions. In linking the Petition Clause to the growing field of Food Studies, the essay breaks some new ground and also promotes the conversation between the First Amendment scholars (and other communication scholars) and scholars from many fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Amendment Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21689725.2014.888861\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Amendment Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2014.888861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Amendment Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2014.888861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

请愿权是第一修正案中一个修辞上有趣但研究不足的部分。学者和普通大众通常把言论自由作为第一修正案的关键方面。虽然言论(表达)自由是一个重要的主题,但我们认为请愿权也是传播学研究中的一个丰富的主题,因为它与社会倡导有关,并且是一种内在的互动活动,具有潜在的重大政策影响。本文提供了请愿的定义,触及了请愿的历史范例,并提出了一个适用于加州第37号提案的九部分请愿模型。作者还讨论了请愿的意想不到的后果和新兴形式的请愿,如网上请愿。在将请愿条款与不断发展的食品研究领域联系起来时,这篇文章开辟了一些新的领域,也促进了第一修正案学者(以及其他传播学者)与许多领域的学者之间的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Petition Clause and Food Advocacy
The right to petition is a rhetorically interesting but understudied portion of the First Amendment. Scholars and the lay public usually focus on freedom of speech as the key aspect of the First Amendment. While freedom of speech (expression) is an important topic, we argue that the right to petition also is a rich topic in communication studies, as it is linked to social advocacy and is an inherently interactive activity with potentially significant policy implications. This essay offers a definition of petition, touches on historical exemplars of petition, and presents a nine-part model of petition that is applied to California Proposition 37. The authors also discuss the unintended consequences of petition and emerging forms of petition, such as online petitions. In linking the Petition Clause to the growing field of Food Studies, the essay breaks some new ground and also promotes the conversation between the First Amendment scholars (and other communication scholars) and scholars from many fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
First Amendment Studies
First Amendment Studies Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: First Amendment Studies publishes original scholarship on all aspects of free speech and embraces the full range of critical, historical, empirical, and descriptive methodologies. First Amendment Studies welcomes scholarship addressing areas including but not limited to: • doctrinal analysis of international and national free speech law and legislation • rhetorical analysis of cases and judicial rhetoric • theoretical and cultural issues related to free speech • the role of free speech in a wide variety of contexts (e.g., organizations, popular culture, traditional and new media).
期刊最新文献
The digital citizen as technoliberal subject: The politics of constitutive rhetoric in the European Union’s Digital Decade The Supreme Court’s rhetorical construction of home On the censoring of Dr. Ahlam Muhtaseb An accounting from Dr. Ahlam Muhtaseb The rhetoric of democracy in United States Senate campaign debates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1