记录音乐沉默和可听性的结构:南非广播公司中央唱片接收委员会1986年至1996年

Claudia Jansen van Rensburg
{"title":"记录音乐沉默和可听性的结构:南非广播公司中央唱片接收委员会1986年至1996年","authors":"Claudia Jansen van Rensburg","doi":"10.1080/18125980.2016.1251004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article explores the censorship of music under apartheid South Africa as practised by the state broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC). The article suggests that while no formal government structures were in place to censor music per se (government censorship structures were primarily concerned with the restriction and surveillance of literature, film and the media), the SABC was the most dominant censor of musical production and dissemination on the apartheid state’s behalf. The article argues, based on archival findings dating from 1986 to 1996, that the SABC’s Central Acceptance Committee (CRAC), tasked to assess the suitability of musical items for broadcast, attempted to align itself with government censorship procedures but was placed in an ambiguous position with the gradual change in political climate from approximately 1990 to 1996 (the year in which the committee was dismantled). The data collected does therefore not reflect a censorship system functioning securely in the years of ‘grand apartheid’, but rather one that was beginning to disintegrate under the pressures of political reform. In addition, the article argues that music, unlike literature (that was assessed in the light of its ‘artistic merit’), was censored without any particular aesthetic programme in mind.","PeriodicalId":42523,"journal":{"name":"Muziki-Journal of Music Research in Africa","volume":"8 1","pages":"51 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18125980.2016.1251004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documenting the structures of musical silencing and audibility: The South African Broadcasting Corporation’s Central Record Acceptance Committee from 1986 to 1996\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Jansen van Rensburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18125980.2016.1251004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article explores the censorship of music under apartheid South Africa as practised by the state broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC). The article suggests that while no formal government structures were in place to censor music per se (government censorship structures were primarily concerned with the restriction and surveillance of literature, film and the media), the SABC was the most dominant censor of musical production and dissemination on the apartheid state’s behalf. The article argues, based on archival findings dating from 1986 to 1996, that the SABC’s Central Acceptance Committee (CRAC), tasked to assess the suitability of musical items for broadcast, attempted to align itself with government censorship procedures but was placed in an ambiguous position with the gradual change in political climate from approximately 1990 to 1996 (the year in which the committee was dismantled). The data collected does therefore not reflect a censorship system functioning securely in the years of ‘grand apartheid’, but rather one that was beginning to disintegrate under the pressures of political reform. In addition, the article argues that music, unlike literature (that was assessed in the light of its ‘artistic merit’), was censored without any particular aesthetic programme in mind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muziki-Journal of Music Research in Africa\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18125980.2016.1251004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muziki-Journal of Music Research in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18125980.2016.1251004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muziki-Journal of Music Research in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18125980.2016.1251004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了国家广播公司南非广播公司(SABC)在种族隔离时期对音乐的审查制度。这篇文章表明,虽然没有正式的政府机构来审查音乐本身(政府审查机构主要关注的是对文学、电影和媒体的限制和监督),但南非广播公司是代表种族隔离国家对音乐制作和传播进行最主要审查的机构。文章认为,根据1986年至1996年的档案调查结果,SABC的中央接受委员会(CRAC)负责评估音乐项目是否适合广播,试图与政府审查程序保持一致,但在1990年至1996年(该委员会被解散的那一年)政治气候的逐渐变化中,该委员会被置于一个模棱两可的位置。因此,收集到的数据并不能反映出审查制度在“大种族隔离”时期的安全运行,而是在政治改革的压力下开始瓦解。此外,这篇文章认为,音乐与文学不同(文学是根据其“艺术价值”来评估的),在审查时没有考虑到任何特定的审美计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Documenting the structures of musical silencing and audibility: The South African Broadcasting Corporation’s Central Record Acceptance Committee from 1986 to 1996
ABSTRACT The article explores the censorship of music under apartheid South Africa as practised by the state broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC). The article suggests that while no formal government structures were in place to censor music per se (government censorship structures were primarily concerned with the restriction and surveillance of literature, film and the media), the SABC was the most dominant censor of musical production and dissemination on the apartheid state’s behalf. The article argues, based on archival findings dating from 1986 to 1996, that the SABC’s Central Acceptance Committee (CRAC), tasked to assess the suitability of musical items for broadcast, attempted to align itself with government censorship procedures but was placed in an ambiguous position with the gradual change in political climate from approximately 1990 to 1996 (the year in which the committee was dismantled). The data collected does therefore not reflect a censorship system functioning securely in the years of ‘grand apartheid’, but rather one that was beginning to disintegrate under the pressures of political reform. In addition, the article argues that music, unlike literature (that was assessed in the light of its ‘artistic merit’), was censored without any particular aesthetic programme in mind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Reflections on Teaching Piano to Young Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders James Steven Mzilikazi Khumalo (1932–2021) Popular Music, Deviance and Moral Panics in Nigeria: The Music of Naira Marley Drumming Tradition among the Xhosa Amagqirha Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1