道德现实主义:自然主义的观点

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Croatian Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2002-03-01 DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280803.003.0010
Michael Devitt
{"title":"道德现实主义:自然主义的观点","authors":"Michael Devitt","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280803.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. What is moral realism? The paper rejects standard answers (SayreMcCord, Railton) in terms of truth and meaning. These standard answers are partly motivated by the phenomenon ofnoncognitivism. Noncognitivism does indeedcause trouble for a straightforwardly metaphysical answer but still such an answer can be given. 2. Why believe moral realism? It is prima facie plausible and its alternatives are not. Major worry: How can moral realism be fitted into a naturalistic world view ? 3. But what about the arguments against moral realism? The paper looks critically at the argument from \"queerness\", the argument from relativity, the argument from explanation, and epistemological arguments. 4. The paper concludes with some brief and inadequate remarks on fulfilling the naturalistic project.","PeriodicalId":43218,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral realism : A naturalistic perspective\",\"authors\":\"Michael Devitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280803.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. What is moral realism? The paper rejects standard answers (SayreMcCord, Railton) in terms of truth and meaning. These standard answers are partly motivated by the phenomenon ofnoncognitivism. Noncognitivism does indeedcause trouble for a straightforwardly metaphysical answer but still such an answer can be given. 2. Why believe moral realism? It is prima facie plausible and its alternatives are not. Major worry: How can moral realism be fitted into a naturalistic world view ? 3. But what about the arguments against moral realism? The paper looks critically at the argument from \\\"queerness\\\", the argument from relativity, the argument from explanation, and epistemological arguments. 4. The paper concludes with some brief and inadequate remarks on fulfilling the naturalistic project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280803.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280803.003.0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

1. 什么是道德现实主义?本文在真理和意义方面拒绝标准答案(SayreMcCord, Railton)。这些标准答案部分是由非认知主义现象引起的。非认知主义确实给直接的形而上学答案带来了麻烦,但仍然可以给出这样的答案。2. 为什么要相信道德现实主义?从表面上看,它是可信的,而它的替代方案则不然。主要的担忧是:道德现实主义如何与自然主义世界观相适应?3.但是反对道德现实主义的观点呢?本文对来自“酷儿”的争论、来自相对论的争论、来自解释的争论和认识论的争论进行了批判。4. 文章最后对实现自然主义工程作了一些简短而不充分的评述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral realism : A naturalistic perspective
1. What is moral realism? The paper rejects standard answers (SayreMcCord, Railton) in terms of truth and meaning. These standard answers are partly motivated by the phenomenon ofnoncognitivism. Noncognitivism does indeedcause trouble for a straightforwardly metaphysical answer but still such an answer can be given. 2. Why believe moral realism? It is prima facie plausible and its alternatives are not. Major worry: How can moral realism be fitted into a naturalistic world view ? 3. But what about the arguments against moral realism? The paper looks critically at the argument from "queerness", the argument from relativity, the argument from explanation, and epistemological arguments. 4. The paper concludes with some brief and inadequate remarks on fulfilling the naturalistic project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Linguistic Conventions or Open-Ended Reasoning Incoherent Meanings What is a Tense, Anyway? Précis for Context and Coherence The Syntax of Prominence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1