愚蠢农场两个仓鸮走廊内小型哺乳动物种群的研究

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Bioscience Horizons Pub Date : 2009-06-01 DOI:10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018
A. Keene
{"title":"愚蠢农场两个仓鸮走廊内小型哺乳动物种群的研究","authors":"A. Keene","doi":"10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines small mammal populations present within Barn owl corridors on Folly Farm, an Avon Wildlife Trust Reserve located near the village of Bishop Sutton in Bath and North East Somerset. Two corridors were chosen, the primary difference between the two sites being only one has undergone management (grazing). The focus of this study was the Microtus agrestis (Short-tailed field vole) population, the most frequently taken prey item by Barn owls. Apodemus sylvaticus (Wood mice) and Sorex araneus (Common shrew) populations are also discussed as they are frequently taken. Using Longworth live traps, 600 trap-nights data were collected from three sessions in November 2006, February and March 2007. Although M. agrestis was the most abundant species in both corridors, they were more prevalent in the un-grazed corridor (comprising 19 of the 31 individuals). In the corridor that had undergone management, fewer M. agrestis were captured (eight), although a higher species diversity and richness was recorded. Unusually for a grassland habitat, there were nearly as many A. sylvaticus as there were M. agrestis (seven compared with eight) in the grazed corridor. Some small mammal species not usually found in grassland habitats were captured; explanations for these seemingly anomalous results are discussed. Differences in population characteristics between the two corridors are discussed including: sex ratio, weights, seasonal variation and age structure. Pellet analysis from the nearby pair of Barn owls showed that they were preferentially hunting M. agrestis; the pellet data largely mirrored findings of the trapping data.","PeriodicalId":52095,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Horizons","volume":"2 1","pages":"155-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of small mammal populations within two Barn owl corridors at Folly Farm\",\"authors\":\"A. Keene\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines small mammal populations present within Barn owl corridors on Folly Farm, an Avon Wildlife Trust Reserve located near the village of Bishop Sutton in Bath and North East Somerset. Two corridors were chosen, the primary difference between the two sites being only one has undergone management (grazing). The focus of this study was the Microtus agrestis (Short-tailed field vole) population, the most frequently taken prey item by Barn owls. Apodemus sylvaticus (Wood mice) and Sorex araneus (Common shrew) populations are also discussed as they are frequently taken. Using Longworth live traps, 600 trap-nights data were collected from three sessions in November 2006, February and March 2007. Although M. agrestis was the most abundant species in both corridors, they were more prevalent in the un-grazed corridor (comprising 19 of the 31 individuals). In the corridor that had undergone management, fewer M. agrestis were captured (eight), although a higher species diversity and richness was recorded. Unusually for a grassland habitat, there were nearly as many A. sylvaticus as there were M. agrestis (seven compared with eight) in the grazed corridor. Some small mammal species not usually found in grassland habitats were captured; explanations for these seemingly anomalous results are discussed. Differences in population characteristics between the two corridors are discussed including: sex ratio, weights, seasonal variation and age structure. Pellet analysis from the nearby pair of Barn owls showed that they were preferentially hunting M. agrestis; the pellet data largely mirrored findings of the trapping data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience Horizons\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"155-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZP018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项研究调查了Folly农场谷仓猫头鹰走廊内的小型哺乳动物种群,该农场是位于巴斯和东北部萨默塞特郡主教萨顿村附近的雅芳野生动物信托保护区。选择了两条走廊,两个地点之间的主要区别是只有一个进行了管理(放牧)。本研究以仓鸮最常捕食的短尾田鼠(Microtus agrestis)为研究对象。森林鼠(木鼠)和鼩鼱(普通鼩鼱)种群也被讨论,因为它们经常被采取。在2006年11月、2007年2月和3月的三次会议中,使用朗沃斯活陷阱收集了600个陷阱夜的数据。虽然在两个廊道中都是最丰富的物种,但在未放牧的廊道中更普遍(占31个个体中的19个)。在经过管理的廊道中,捕获的野田鼠较少(8只),但物种多样性和丰富度较高。不同寻常的是,在放牧走廊中,森林针叶树的数量几乎与草地针叶树的数量一样多(7比8)。捕获了一些草原上不常见的小型哺乳动物;对这些看似反常的结果的解释进行了讨论。讨论了两个廊道人口特征的差异,包括:性别比、权重、季节变化和年龄结构。附近一对仓鸮的颗粒分析表明,它们优先捕食M. agrestis;颗粒数据在很大程度上反映了捕获数据的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of small mammal populations within two Barn owl corridors at Folly Farm
This study examines small mammal populations present within Barn owl corridors on Folly Farm, an Avon Wildlife Trust Reserve located near the village of Bishop Sutton in Bath and North East Somerset. Two corridors were chosen, the primary difference between the two sites being only one has undergone management (grazing). The focus of this study was the Microtus agrestis (Short-tailed field vole) population, the most frequently taken prey item by Barn owls. Apodemus sylvaticus (Wood mice) and Sorex araneus (Common shrew) populations are also discussed as they are frequently taken. Using Longworth live traps, 600 trap-nights data were collected from three sessions in November 2006, February and March 2007. Although M. agrestis was the most abundant species in both corridors, they were more prevalent in the un-grazed corridor (comprising 19 of the 31 individuals). In the corridor that had undergone management, fewer M. agrestis were captured (eight), although a higher species diversity and richness was recorded. Unusually for a grassland habitat, there were nearly as many A. sylvaticus as there were M. agrestis (seven compared with eight) in the grazed corridor. Some small mammal species not usually found in grassland habitats were captured; explanations for these seemingly anomalous results are discussed. Differences in population characteristics between the two corridors are discussed including: sex ratio, weights, seasonal variation and age structure. Pellet analysis from the nearby pair of Barn owls showed that they were preferentially hunting M. agrestis; the pellet data largely mirrored findings of the trapping data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioscience Horizons
Bioscience Horizons Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PAD4 inhibitors: potential sensitizers of tumour cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis Taxonomic significance of transverse sections of roots of six Citrus species Effect of hypoxia on chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells Comparison of bioartificial and artificial pancreatic transplantation as promising therapies for Type I Diabetes Mellitus Faecal microbiota transplantation: a review of FMT as an alternative treatment for Clostridium difficile infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1