调查多发性硬化症患者情绪和疲劳与客观和主观认知障碍的关系

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1111/jnp.12283
Laura Davenport, Clodagh Cogley, Ruth Monaghan, Maria Gaughan, Mei Yap, Jessica Bramham, Niall Tubridy, Chris McGuigan, Fiadhnait O'Keeffe
{"title":"调查多发性硬化症患者情绪和疲劳与客观和主观认知障碍的关系","authors":"Laura Davenport,&nbsp;Clodagh Cogley,&nbsp;Ruth Monaghan,&nbsp;Maria Gaughan,&nbsp;Mei Yap,&nbsp;Jessica Bramham,&nbsp;Niall Tubridy,&nbsp;Chris McGuigan,&nbsp;Fiadhnait O'Keeffe","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Discrepancies between subjective cognitive difficulties and objective measures of cognitive function in people with MS have been identified and may be related to mood and fatigue. The aim of the present study was to examine associations of depression and fatigue with discrepancies between subjective and objective cognitive functioning in pwMS. 177 participants with MS attending a University Hospital Department of Neurology MS Outpatient clinic completed the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). To quantify the discrepancy between objective (BICAMS) and subjective (MSNQ) cognitive functioning, discrepancy scores were calculated by subtracting MSNQ <i>z</i>-score from composite BICAMS <i>z</i>-score. Based on their discrepancy score, participants were grouped as ‘Underestimated’, ‘Overestimated’ and ‘Non-discrepant’. 39% of the total sample demonstrated poorer subjective cognitive functioning than their objective cognitive performance suggested (‘Underestimated’). 23% of the total sample indicated lower objective scores than their subjective report suggests (‘Overestimated’). 38% participants indicated relatively no discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive measures (‘Non-discrepant’). Significant differences were observed between the discrepancy groups in terms of depression and fatigue, with the ‘Underestimated’ group demonstrating greater levels of depression and fatigue (<i>p</i>s &lt; .01). Regression analysis indicated that cognitive fatigue and depression significantly contributed to variance in subjective cognitive functioning. Our findings suggest that subjective reports of cognitive function may be influenced by depression and fatigue, emphasising the importance of cognitive, mood and fatigue screening as part of routine clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":"16 3","pages":"537-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the association of mood and fatigue with objective and subjective cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Laura Davenport,&nbsp;Clodagh Cogley,&nbsp;Ruth Monaghan,&nbsp;Maria Gaughan,&nbsp;Mei Yap,&nbsp;Jessica Bramham,&nbsp;Niall Tubridy,&nbsp;Chris McGuigan,&nbsp;Fiadhnait O'Keeffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnp.12283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Discrepancies between subjective cognitive difficulties and objective measures of cognitive function in people with MS have been identified and may be related to mood and fatigue. The aim of the present study was to examine associations of depression and fatigue with discrepancies between subjective and objective cognitive functioning in pwMS. 177 participants with MS attending a University Hospital Department of Neurology MS Outpatient clinic completed the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). To quantify the discrepancy between objective (BICAMS) and subjective (MSNQ) cognitive functioning, discrepancy scores were calculated by subtracting MSNQ <i>z</i>-score from composite BICAMS <i>z</i>-score. Based on their discrepancy score, participants were grouped as ‘Underestimated’, ‘Overestimated’ and ‘Non-discrepant’. 39% of the total sample demonstrated poorer subjective cognitive functioning than their objective cognitive performance suggested (‘Underestimated’). 23% of the total sample indicated lower objective scores than their subjective report suggests (‘Overestimated’). 38% participants indicated relatively no discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive measures (‘Non-discrepant’). Significant differences were observed between the discrepancy groups in terms of depression and fatigue, with the ‘Underestimated’ group demonstrating greater levels of depression and fatigue (<i>p</i>s &lt; .01). Regression analysis indicated that cognitive fatigue and depression significantly contributed to variance in subjective cognitive functioning. Our findings suggest that subjective reports of cognitive function may be influenced by depression and fatigue, emphasising the importance of cognitive, mood and fatigue screening as part of routine clinical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"537-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnp.12283\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnp.12283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

MS患者的主观认知困难和客观认知功能测量之间的差异已经被确定,可能与情绪和疲劳有关。本研究的目的是检查抑郁症和疲劳与主客观认知功能差异的关联。177名MS患者在某大学医院神经内科MS门诊完成了国际MS简短认知评估(BICAMS)、MS神经心理问卷(MSNQ)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和修正疲劳影响量表(MFIS)。为了量化客观认知功能(BICAMS)和主观认知功能(MSNQ)之间的差异,用BICAMS z-score减去MSNQ z-score计算差异评分。根据他们的差异得分,参与者被分为“低估”、“高估”和“非差异”。总样本中有39%的人表现出较差的主观认知功能,而不是他们的客观认知表现(“低估”)。总样本中有23%的人的客观得分低于他们的主观报告(“高估”)。38%的参与者表示客观和主观认知测量之间相对没有差异(“无差异”)。在抑郁和疲劳方面,差异组之间观察到显著差异,“低估”组表现出更高水平的抑郁和疲劳(ps < 0.01)。回归分析表明,认知疲劳和抑郁对主观认知功能变异有显著影响。我们的研究结果表明,认知功能的主观报告可能受到抑郁和疲劳的影响,强调了认知、情绪和疲劳筛查作为常规临床护理一部分的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the association of mood and fatigue with objective and subjective cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

Discrepancies between subjective cognitive difficulties and objective measures of cognitive function in people with MS have been identified and may be related to mood and fatigue. The aim of the present study was to examine associations of depression and fatigue with discrepancies between subjective and objective cognitive functioning in pwMS. 177 participants with MS attending a University Hospital Department of Neurology MS Outpatient clinic completed the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). To quantify the discrepancy between objective (BICAMS) and subjective (MSNQ) cognitive functioning, discrepancy scores were calculated by subtracting MSNQ z-score from composite BICAMS z-score. Based on their discrepancy score, participants were grouped as ‘Underestimated’, ‘Overestimated’ and ‘Non-discrepant’. 39% of the total sample demonstrated poorer subjective cognitive functioning than their objective cognitive performance suggested (‘Underestimated’). 23% of the total sample indicated lower objective scores than their subjective report suggests (‘Overestimated’). 38% participants indicated relatively no discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive measures (‘Non-discrepant’). Significant differences were observed between the discrepancy groups in terms of depression and fatigue, with the ‘Underestimated’ group demonstrating greater levels of depression and fatigue (ps < .01). Regression analysis indicated that cognitive fatigue and depression significantly contributed to variance in subjective cognitive functioning. Our findings suggest that subjective reports of cognitive function may be influenced by depression and fatigue, emphasising the importance of cognitive, mood and fatigue screening as part of routine clinical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
期刊最新文献
Non-optimal cognitive offloading in schizophrenia in a prospective memory task: Influence of both metacognitive beliefs and cognitive effort avoidance. Alzheimer's disease-Biomarkers, clinical evaluation or both? Resolving the problem of surface dyslexia in Italian through inflection of irregular verbs. Reducing confusion surrounding expert conceptions of Alzheimer's and dementia: A practical analysis. Translation and validation of the abbreviated Prefrontal Symptoms Inventory (PSI-20): A tool for assessing prefrontal symptoms in English-speaking populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1