南方常见树种压实与未压实活冠比的关系式

K. Randolph
{"title":"南方常见树种压实与未压实活冠比的关系式","authors":"K. Randolph","doi":"10.1093/SJAF/34.3.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Species-specific equations to predict uncompacted crown ratio (UNCR) from compacted live crown ratio (CCR), tree length, and stem diameter were developed for 24 species and 12 genera in the southern United States. Using data from the US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program, nonlinear regression was used to model UNCR with a logistic function. Model performance was evaluated with standard fit statistics (root mean squared error, mean absolute error, mean error, and model efficiency) and by comparing the results of using the observed and predicted UNCR values in secondary applications. Root mean squared error for the regression models ranged from 0.062 to 0.176 UNCR and averaged 0.114 UNCR across all models. Height to live crown base calculations and crown width estimations based on the observed and predicted UNCR values were in dose agreement. Overall, the models performed well for the Pinus and Taxodium genera and several individual hardwood species; however, model performance was generally poar for the Acer, Quercus, and (arya genera.","PeriodicalId":51154,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"34 1","pages":"118-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/SJAF/34.3.118","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equations relating compacted and uncompacted live crown ratio for common tree species in the South\",\"authors\":\"K. Randolph\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/SJAF/34.3.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Species-specific equations to predict uncompacted crown ratio (UNCR) from compacted live crown ratio (CCR), tree length, and stem diameter were developed for 24 species and 12 genera in the southern United States. Using data from the US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program, nonlinear regression was used to model UNCR with a logistic function. Model performance was evaluated with standard fit statistics (root mean squared error, mean absolute error, mean error, and model efficiency) and by comparing the results of using the observed and predicted UNCR values in secondary applications. Root mean squared error for the regression models ranged from 0.062 to 0.176 UNCR and averaged 0.114 UNCR across all models. Height to live crown base calculations and crown width estimations based on the observed and predicted UNCR values were in dose agreement. Overall, the models performed well for the Pinus and Taxodium genera and several individual hardwood species; however, model performance was generally poar for the Acer, Quercus, and (arya genera.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"118-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/SJAF/34.3.118\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/SJAF/34.3.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SJAF/34.3.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

以美国南部地区的12个属24个树种为研究对象,建立了用实活冠比(CCR)、树长和茎粗预测未压实冠比(UNCR)的物种特异性方程。利用美国林务局森林清查和分析项目的数据,采用非线性回归方法对UNCR进行logistic函数建模。通过标准拟合统计(均方根误差、平均绝对误差、平均误差和模型效率)以及在二次应用中使用观察到的和预测的UNCR值的结果进行比较,评估模型的性能。回归模型的均方根误差范围为0.062至0.176 UNCR,所有模型的平均误差为0.114 UNCR。根据观测到的和预测的UNCR值计算的活冠基高度和冠宽估计的剂量一致。总体而言,该模型对松木属、紫杉属和个别硬木种均表现良好;然而,Acer、Quercus和arya属的模型性能一般较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equations relating compacted and uncompacted live crown ratio for common tree species in the South
Species-specific equations to predict uncompacted crown ratio (UNCR) from compacted live crown ratio (CCR), tree length, and stem diameter were developed for 24 species and 12 genera in the southern United States. Using data from the US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program, nonlinear regression was used to model UNCR with a logistic function. Model performance was evaluated with standard fit statistics (root mean squared error, mean absolute error, mean error, and model efficiency) and by comparing the results of using the observed and predicted UNCR values in secondary applications. Root mean squared error for the regression models ranged from 0.062 to 0.176 UNCR and averaged 0.114 UNCR across all models. Height to live crown base calculations and crown width estimations based on the observed and predicted UNCR values were in dose agreement. Overall, the models performed well for the Pinus and Taxodium genera and several individual hardwood species; however, model performance was generally poar for the Acer, Quercus, and (arya genera.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transhepatic double lumen hemodialysis catheter in exhausted vascular access: Feasibility, functionality, and outcome among hemodialysis patients. Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors Among Adults with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Kerala, India. Shackleton's heart. Diffeomorphic Surface Registration with Atrophy Constraints. Identifying market opportunities for Appalachian forest products companies in Central America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1