LeAnn Lux, Jessica M. Halvorson, Bryan Hansen, Scott M. Meyer, Scott Fitterer, David Carruth, A. Friskop
{"title":"Metconazole + Prothioconazole、Pydiflumetofen + Propiconazole及品种抗病性对硬红春小麦赤霉病及产量的影响","authors":"LeAnn Lux, Jessica M. Halvorson, Bryan Hansen, Scott M. Meyer, Scott Fitterer, David Carruth, A. Friskop","doi":"10.1094/php-08-22-0070-rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused primarily by Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe), is one of the most significant diseases of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) in North Dakota (ND). Implementing integrated management practices such as host resistance and fungicides can be used to manage FHB and the associated mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON). However, depending on the production year in ND, both management tools may not be needed for FHB. The objectives of this research were to evaluate fungicide premixes and varietal resistance on suppression of FHB, suppression of DON, and economic response in diverse FHB environments in dryland HRSW. Seven field experiments were conducted at dryland locations from 2019 to 2021. Two HRSW varieties, WB-Mayville (susceptible) and ND-VitPro (moderately resistant) served as the main plots and seven fungicide treatments including a non-treated control served as the sub-plots. Based on disease levels and local weather data (relative humidity, rainfall, and temperature) field experiments were categorized into four FHB management environments (high, moderate, low and no disease) to assess effectiveness of management tools in field situations faced by HRSW growers. The fungicide premixture treatments of metconazole + prothioconazole and pydiflumetofen + propiconazole provided similar or better suppression of FHB and DON when compared to FHB fungicide standards. Results suggest that the use of fungicides on a moderately resistant variety provided a more favorable economic response when compared to their use on a susceptible variety in moderate and low FHB environments. Results from this study will help guide FHB management decisions in dryland HRSW.","PeriodicalId":20251,"journal":{"name":"Plant Health Progress","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Metconazole + Prothioconazole, Pydiflumetofen + Propiconazole, and Variety Resistance on Fusarium Head Blight and Yield in Hard Red Spring Wheat\",\"authors\":\"LeAnn Lux, Jessica M. Halvorson, Bryan Hansen, Scott M. Meyer, Scott Fitterer, David Carruth, A. Friskop\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/php-08-22-0070-rs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused primarily by Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe), is one of the most significant diseases of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) in North Dakota (ND). Implementing integrated management practices such as host resistance and fungicides can be used to manage FHB and the associated mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON). However, depending on the production year in ND, both management tools may not be needed for FHB. The objectives of this research were to evaluate fungicide premixes and varietal resistance on suppression of FHB, suppression of DON, and economic response in diverse FHB environments in dryland HRSW. Seven field experiments were conducted at dryland locations from 2019 to 2021. Two HRSW varieties, WB-Mayville (susceptible) and ND-VitPro (moderately resistant) served as the main plots and seven fungicide treatments including a non-treated control served as the sub-plots. Based on disease levels and local weather data (relative humidity, rainfall, and temperature) field experiments were categorized into four FHB management environments (high, moderate, low and no disease) to assess effectiveness of management tools in field situations faced by HRSW growers. The fungicide premixture treatments of metconazole + prothioconazole and pydiflumetofen + propiconazole provided similar or better suppression of FHB and DON when compared to FHB fungicide standards. Results suggest that the use of fungicides on a moderately resistant variety provided a more favorable economic response when compared to their use on a susceptible variety in moderate and low FHB environments. Results from this study will help guide FHB management decisions in dryland HRSW.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Health Progress\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Health Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-08-22-0070-rs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Health Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-08-22-0070-rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
赤霉病(Fusarium head blight, FHB)是美国北达科他州硬红春小麦(HRSW)的主要病害之一,主要由禾谷镰刀菌(Fusarium graminearum, Schwabe)引起。实施诸如宿主耐药性和杀菌剂等综合管理措施可用于管理FHB和相关真菌毒素脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇(DON)。然而,根据ND的生产年份,这两种管理工具可能不需要用于FHB。本研究的目的是评价杀菌剂预混料和品种在旱地高寒地区不同赤霉病环境下对赤霉病的抑制、对DON的抑制以及经济响应。2019 - 2021年在旱地进行了7次田间试验。2个HRSW品种WB-Mayville(敏感)和ND-VitPro(中等抗性)为主区,7个杀菌剂处理(包括一个未处理的对照)为副区。根据疾病水平和当地天气数据(相对湿度、降雨量和温度),将田间试验分为四种FHB管理环境(高、中、低和无疾病),以评估管理工具在HRSW种植者面临的田间情况下的有效性。与FHB杀菌剂标准相比,甲基康唑+原硫康唑和吡氟甲醚+丙环康唑的混配处理对FHB和DON的抑制效果相似或更好。结果表明,在中等和低FHB环境中,与在敏感品种上使用杀菌剂相比,在中等抗性品种上使用杀菌剂提供了更有利的经济反应。本研究的结果将有助于指导旱地HRSW的食品卫生管理决策。
Effect of Metconazole + Prothioconazole, Pydiflumetofen + Propiconazole, and Variety Resistance on Fusarium Head Blight and Yield in Hard Red Spring Wheat
Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused primarily by Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe), is one of the most significant diseases of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) in North Dakota (ND). Implementing integrated management practices such as host resistance and fungicides can be used to manage FHB and the associated mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON). However, depending on the production year in ND, both management tools may not be needed for FHB. The objectives of this research were to evaluate fungicide premixes and varietal resistance on suppression of FHB, suppression of DON, and economic response in diverse FHB environments in dryland HRSW. Seven field experiments were conducted at dryland locations from 2019 to 2021. Two HRSW varieties, WB-Mayville (susceptible) and ND-VitPro (moderately resistant) served as the main plots and seven fungicide treatments including a non-treated control served as the sub-plots. Based on disease levels and local weather data (relative humidity, rainfall, and temperature) field experiments were categorized into four FHB management environments (high, moderate, low and no disease) to assess effectiveness of management tools in field situations faced by HRSW growers. The fungicide premixture treatments of metconazole + prothioconazole and pydiflumetofen + propiconazole provided similar or better suppression of FHB and DON when compared to FHB fungicide standards. Results suggest that the use of fungicides on a moderately resistant variety provided a more favorable economic response when compared to their use on a susceptible variety in moderate and low FHB environments. Results from this study will help guide FHB management decisions in dryland HRSW.
期刊介绍:
Plant Health Progress, a member journal of the Plant Management Network, is a multidisciplinary science-based journal covering all aspects of applied plant health management in agriculture and horticulture. Both peer-reviewed and fully citable, the journal is a credible online-only publication. Plant Health Progress is a not-for-profit collaborative endeavor of the plant health community at large, serving practitioners worldwide. Its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive one-stop Internet resource for plant health information.