神经纤维局部延伸到皮肤无神经支配的区域。

G. Weddell, L. Guttmann, E. Gutmann
{"title":"神经纤维局部延伸到皮肤无神经支配的区域。","authors":"G. Weddell, L. Guttmann, E. Gutmann","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BMB.A070230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction THE existence of extensive overlap between the cutaneous nerve fibres derived from successive nerve roots was first demonstrated by Sherrington (1893) in a study of residual sensibility after section of one or more roots. Other methods, such as that involving local strychninization of the dorsal spinal roots employed by Dusser de Barenne (1910), have been found to give essentially similar results. The method of antidromic stimulation (originally used by Stricker (1876) and Bayliss (1901)) and the study of residual sensibility after the section of dorsal nerve roots were both employed by Foerster (1936) to determine the extent of each human dermatome, and again the correspondence between the results obtained by both methods was close. The amount of overlap which exists between the peripheral cutaneous nerves of the limbs has been determined by a number of methods, which include anatomical dissection, the successive anesthetization of nerves supplying contiguous areas of skin followed by sensory tests (Woollard et al., 1940), electrical stimulation methods through the intact skin (Thompson et al., 1934), and finally by the analysis of the sensory loss following peripheral nerve injuries in a large series of patients (Foerster, 1917, 1929). The correspondence between the stimulation and anwsthetization methods is reasonably close. On the other hand, the analysis of sensory loss and sweat secretion (Guttmann, 1940) following nerve injuries shows in many cases very large degrees of overlap which are not demonstrated by the other methods. This finding, taken in conjunction with the clinical observation by Pollock (1920) that the areas of sensory loss following nerve injuries shrink circumferentially before any regeneration can have taken place from the central stump, suggests either that the method of recording residual sensibility is not entirely accurate or that a proportion of overlapping nerve fibres do not transmit impulses giving rise to sensations for some time following a nerve lesion (Pollock, 1919). It is also possible that a new growth of fibres from surrounding normal nerves towards the area of sensory loss takes place (Schuh, 191 1, and Weddell and Glees, 1941). The method of staining nerve fibres throughout large whole preparations of skin by local injection of methylene blue (Weddell, 1941) has been applied 206","PeriodicalId":54783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1943-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BMB.A070230","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE LOCAL EXTENSION OF NERVE FIBRES INTO DENERVATED AREAS OF SKIN.\",\"authors\":\"G. Weddell, L. Guttmann, E. Gutmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BMB.A070230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction THE existence of extensive overlap between the cutaneous nerve fibres derived from successive nerve roots was first demonstrated by Sherrington (1893) in a study of residual sensibility after section of one or more roots. Other methods, such as that involving local strychninization of the dorsal spinal roots employed by Dusser de Barenne (1910), have been found to give essentially similar results. The method of antidromic stimulation (originally used by Stricker (1876) and Bayliss (1901)) and the study of residual sensibility after the section of dorsal nerve roots were both employed by Foerster (1936) to determine the extent of each human dermatome, and again the correspondence between the results obtained by both methods was close. The amount of overlap which exists between the peripheral cutaneous nerves of the limbs has been determined by a number of methods, which include anatomical dissection, the successive anesthetization of nerves supplying contiguous areas of skin followed by sensory tests (Woollard et al., 1940), electrical stimulation methods through the intact skin (Thompson et al., 1934), and finally by the analysis of the sensory loss following peripheral nerve injuries in a large series of patients (Foerster, 1917, 1929). The correspondence between the stimulation and anwsthetization methods is reasonably close. On the other hand, the analysis of sensory loss and sweat secretion (Guttmann, 1940) following nerve injuries shows in many cases very large degrees of overlap which are not demonstrated by the other methods. This finding, taken in conjunction with the clinical observation by Pollock (1920) that the areas of sensory loss following nerve injuries shrink circumferentially before any regeneration can have taken place from the central stump, suggests either that the method of recording residual sensibility is not entirely accurate or that a proportion of overlapping nerve fibres do not transmit impulses giving rise to sensations for some time following a nerve lesion (Pollock, 1919). It is also possible that a new growth of fibres from surrounding normal nerves towards the area of sensory loss takes place (Schuh, 191 1, and Weddell and Glees, 1941). The method of staining nerve fibres throughout large whole preparations of skin by local injection of methylene blue (Weddell, 1941) has been applied 206\",\"PeriodicalId\":54783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1943-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BMB.A070230\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BMB.A070230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BMB.A070230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

Sherrington(1893)在对一个或多个神经根切除后残余敏感性的研究中首次证实了来源于连续神经根的皮神经纤维之间存在广泛的重叠。其他方法,如Dusser de Barenne(1910)所采用的脊髓后根局部strychninization,也得到了基本相似的结果。Foerster(1936)采用反角刺激法(最初由Stricker(1876)和Bayliss(1901)使用)和背神经根切片后残余敏感性的研究来确定人体每个皮节的范围,两种方法得到的结果也非常吻合。肢体周围皮神经之间存在的重叠量已通过多种方法确定,包括解剖解剖,连续麻醉供应连续皮肤区域的神经,然后进行感觉测试(woolard等人,1940),通过完整皮肤的电刺激方法(Thompson等人,1934),最后通过对大量患者周围神经损伤后感觉丧失的分析(Foerster, 1917, 1929)。刺激和激励方法之间的对应关系相当密切。另一方面,对神经损伤后感觉丧失和汗液分泌的分析(Guttmann, 1940)显示,在许多情况下,其他方法没有显示出非常大程度的重叠。这一发现与Pollock(1920)的临床观察相结合,即神经损伤后的感觉丧失区域在中央残端再生之前会呈周向收缩,这表明要么记录残余敏感性的方法并不完全准确,要么部分重叠的神经纤维在神经损伤后的一段时间内不能传递产生感觉的冲动(Pollock, 1919)。也有可能是周围正常神经的纤维向感觉丧失区域生长(Schuh, 1991, and Weddell and Glees, 1941)。通过局部注射亚甲基蓝染色神经纤维的方法已经应用于整个皮肤的大制剂(Weddell, 1941)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE LOCAL EXTENSION OF NERVE FIBRES INTO DENERVATED AREAS OF SKIN.
Introduction THE existence of extensive overlap between the cutaneous nerve fibres derived from successive nerve roots was first demonstrated by Sherrington (1893) in a study of residual sensibility after section of one or more roots. Other methods, such as that involving local strychninization of the dorsal spinal roots employed by Dusser de Barenne (1910), have been found to give essentially similar results. The method of antidromic stimulation (originally used by Stricker (1876) and Bayliss (1901)) and the study of residual sensibility after the section of dorsal nerve roots were both employed by Foerster (1936) to determine the extent of each human dermatome, and again the correspondence between the results obtained by both methods was close. The amount of overlap which exists between the peripheral cutaneous nerves of the limbs has been determined by a number of methods, which include anatomical dissection, the successive anesthetization of nerves supplying contiguous areas of skin followed by sensory tests (Woollard et al., 1940), electrical stimulation methods through the intact skin (Thompson et al., 1934), and finally by the analysis of the sensory loss following peripheral nerve injuries in a large series of patients (Foerster, 1917, 1929). The correspondence between the stimulation and anwsthetization methods is reasonably close. On the other hand, the analysis of sensory loss and sweat secretion (Guttmann, 1940) following nerve injuries shows in many cases very large degrees of overlap which are not demonstrated by the other methods. This finding, taken in conjunction with the clinical observation by Pollock (1920) that the areas of sensory loss following nerve injuries shrink circumferentially before any regeneration can have taken place from the central stump, suggests either that the method of recording residual sensibility is not entirely accurate or that a proportion of overlapping nerve fibres do not transmit impulses giving rise to sensations for some time following a nerve lesion (Pollock, 1919). It is also possible that a new growth of fibres from surrounding normal nerves towards the area of sensory loss takes place (Schuh, 191 1, and Weddell and Glees, 1941). The method of staining nerve fibres throughout large whole preparations of skin by local injection of methylene blue (Weddell, 1941) has been applied 206
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TRAUMATIC DILATATION OF THE CEREBRAL VENTRICLES. THE EFFECT OF GALVANIC EXERCISE ON DENERVATED AND RE-INNERVATED MUSCLES IN THE RABBIT. MYELITIS DUE TO VACCINATION. THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF TWO THOUSAND CASES OF NEUROSIS. CAUSATION OF MONGOLISM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1