关节内注射脂肪来源的干细胞可以减轻膝关节骨关节炎的疼痛和炎症,无论是否添加富含血小板的血浆也可以改善功能

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.1002/term.3337
Laynna Carvalho Schweich-Adami, Roberto Antoniolli da Silva, Jovino Nogueira da Silva Menezes, Adrivanio Baranoski, Candida Aparecida Leite Kassuya, Luana Bernardi, Rodrigo Juliano Oliveira, Andréia Concei??o Milan Brochado Antoniolli-Silva
{"title":"关节内注射脂肪来源的干细胞可以减轻膝关节骨关节炎的疼痛和炎症,无论是否添加富含血小板的血浆也可以改善功能","authors":"Laynna Carvalho Schweich-Adami,&nbsp;Roberto Antoniolli da Silva,&nbsp;Jovino Nogueira da Silva Menezes,&nbsp;Adrivanio Baranoski,&nbsp;Candida Aparecida Leite Kassuya,&nbsp;Luana Bernardi,&nbsp;Rodrigo Juliano Oliveira,&nbsp;Andréia Concei??o Milan Brochado Antoniolli-Silva","doi":"10.1002/term.3337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increase of individuals with Osteoarthritis (OA) has generated an increase in public spending in the treatments, which are still not that effective. So, the purpose of this study was to analyze and compare four types of interventions: platelet-rich plasma (PRP), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), ADSCs + PRP and the standard surgical video arthroscopy (All groups passed through standard arthroscopy before intervention). The evaluation was performed by applying the questionnaires Western Ontario McMaster Universities, Short Form Health Survey 36 and Visual Analog Pain Scale, also by analyzing the synovial fluid (inflammatory cytokines, enzymatic, colorimetric and viscosity analysis), this evaluation happened in two moments: before the surgical procedures and after 6 months of the interventions and also was made a comparison to standard arthroscopy. The questionnaires results showed a greater improvement in the scores of the domains analyzed in the ADSCs + PRP group, followed by the ADSCs and PRP group. In the evaluation of inflammatory cytokines, there was a significant reduction in the cytokine IL-1b only in the ADSCs + PRP group (46%) and ADSCs (31%), of IL-6 in the ADSCs + PRP group (72%), of IL-8 in the ADSCs + PRP group (50%) and ADSCs (31%), and TNF in the ADSCs + PRP group (46%). There was also a significant increase in the amount of total proteins (79%) in the control group and polymorphonuclear cells (47%) in the ADSCs + PRP group. Taking all the results into account, we infer that therapies with ADSCs + PRP and only ADSCs are safe and effective over 6 months for the improvement of pain, functional capacity and joint inflammation in volunteers with OA. It is also considered that the use of ADSCs + PRP, particularly, is a promising alternative to help manage this disease, due to the better results presented among the four propose interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":"16 10","pages":"900-912"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The intra-articular injection of adipose-derived stem cells decreases pain and reduces inflammation in knee osteoarthritis, with or without the addition of platelet-rich plasma also improves functionality\",\"authors\":\"Laynna Carvalho Schweich-Adami,&nbsp;Roberto Antoniolli da Silva,&nbsp;Jovino Nogueira da Silva Menezes,&nbsp;Adrivanio Baranoski,&nbsp;Candida Aparecida Leite Kassuya,&nbsp;Luana Bernardi,&nbsp;Rodrigo Juliano Oliveira,&nbsp;Andréia Concei??o Milan Brochado Antoniolli-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/term.3337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The increase of individuals with Osteoarthritis (OA) has generated an increase in public spending in the treatments, which are still not that effective. So, the purpose of this study was to analyze and compare four types of interventions: platelet-rich plasma (PRP), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), ADSCs + PRP and the standard surgical video arthroscopy (All groups passed through standard arthroscopy before intervention). The evaluation was performed by applying the questionnaires Western Ontario McMaster Universities, Short Form Health Survey 36 and Visual Analog Pain Scale, also by analyzing the synovial fluid (inflammatory cytokines, enzymatic, colorimetric and viscosity analysis), this evaluation happened in two moments: before the surgical procedures and after 6 months of the interventions and also was made a comparison to standard arthroscopy. The questionnaires results showed a greater improvement in the scores of the domains analyzed in the ADSCs + PRP group, followed by the ADSCs and PRP group. In the evaluation of inflammatory cytokines, there was a significant reduction in the cytokine IL-1b only in the ADSCs + PRP group (46%) and ADSCs (31%), of IL-6 in the ADSCs + PRP group (72%), of IL-8 in the ADSCs + PRP group (50%) and ADSCs (31%), and TNF in the ADSCs + PRP group (46%). There was also a significant increase in the amount of total proteins (79%) in the control group and polymorphonuclear cells (47%) in the ADSCs + PRP group. Taking all the results into account, we infer that therapies with ADSCs + PRP and only ADSCs are safe and effective over 6 months for the improvement of pain, functional capacity and joint inflammation in volunteers with OA. It is also considered that the use of ADSCs + PRP, particularly, is a promising alternative to help manage this disease, due to the better results presented among the four propose interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"900-912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/term.3337\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/term.3337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

骨性关节炎(OA)患者的增加导致了治疗方面的公共支出的增加,但这些治疗仍然没有那么有效。因此,本研究的目的是分析和比较富血小板血浆(PRP)、脂肪源性干细胞(ADSCs)、ADSCs + PRP和标准手术视频关节镜四种干预方法(所有组在干预前均经过标准关节镜检查)。评估采用了安大略省西部麦克马斯特大学问卷调查、简短健康调查36和视觉模拟疼痛量表,也通过分析滑液(炎症细胞因子、酶、比色和粘度分析)进行,该评估在手术前和干预6个月后两个时间进行,并与标准关节镜检查进行比较。问卷调查结果显示,ADSCs + PRP组分析的域得分有较大改善,其次是ADSCs和PRP组。在炎症因子的评估中,细胞因子IL-1b仅在ADSCs + PRP组(46%)和ADSCs(31%)中显著降低,IL-6在ADSCs + PRP组(72%)中显著降低,IL-8在ADSCs + PRP组(50%)和ADSCs(31%)中显著降低,TNF在ADSCs + PRP组(46%)中显著降低。对照组的总蛋白数量(79%)和ADSCs + PRP组的多形核细胞数量(47%)也显著增加。考虑到所有结果,我们推断ADSCs + PRP治疗和仅ADSCs治疗在6个月内对OA志愿者疼痛、功能能力和关节炎症的改善是安全有效的。由于在四种提出的干预措施中呈现出更好的结果,因此人们还认为,特别是ADSCs + PRP的使用是一种有希望的替代方法来帮助控制这种疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The intra-articular injection of adipose-derived stem cells decreases pain and reduces inflammation in knee osteoarthritis, with or without the addition of platelet-rich plasma also improves functionality

The increase of individuals with Osteoarthritis (OA) has generated an increase in public spending in the treatments, which are still not that effective. So, the purpose of this study was to analyze and compare four types of interventions: platelet-rich plasma (PRP), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), ADSCs + PRP and the standard surgical video arthroscopy (All groups passed through standard arthroscopy before intervention). The evaluation was performed by applying the questionnaires Western Ontario McMaster Universities, Short Form Health Survey 36 and Visual Analog Pain Scale, also by analyzing the synovial fluid (inflammatory cytokines, enzymatic, colorimetric and viscosity analysis), this evaluation happened in two moments: before the surgical procedures and after 6 months of the interventions and also was made a comparison to standard arthroscopy. The questionnaires results showed a greater improvement in the scores of the domains analyzed in the ADSCs + PRP group, followed by the ADSCs and PRP group. In the evaluation of inflammatory cytokines, there was a significant reduction in the cytokine IL-1b only in the ADSCs + PRP group (46%) and ADSCs (31%), of IL-6 in the ADSCs + PRP group (72%), of IL-8 in the ADSCs + PRP group (50%) and ADSCs (31%), and TNF in the ADSCs + PRP group (46%). There was also a significant increase in the amount of total proteins (79%) in the control group and polymorphonuclear cells (47%) in the ADSCs + PRP group. Taking all the results into account, we infer that therapies with ADSCs + PRP and only ADSCs are safe and effective over 6 months for the improvement of pain, functional capacity and joint inflammation in volunteers with OA. It is also considered that the use of ADSCs + PRP, particularly, is a promising alternative to help manage this disease, due to the better results presented among the four propose interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs. The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.
期刊最新文献
Challenges and Advances in Peripheral Nerve Tissue Engineering Critical Factors Affecting Nerve Regeneration Polycaprolactone Fiber and Laminin and Collagen IV Protein Incorporation in Implants Enhances Wound Healing in a Novel Mouse Skin Splint Model Herpesvirus-Entry Mediator Inhibits the NF-κB Pathway Activated by IL-17 and Fosters the Osteogenic Differentiation of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Decellularisation and Characterisation of Porcine Pleura as Bioscaffolds in Tissue Engineering Harnessing the Regenerative Potential of Fetal Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells in the Biofabrication of Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts (TEVGs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1