{"title":"通情达理的人的许多面","authors":"J. Gardner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198852940.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviews the various legal contexts in which the reasonable person test may be invoked. Argues that the test supplies extra-legal standards from which courts must attempt to construct legal standards, and discusses why this is deemed a useful adjudicative exercise. Suggests that the reasonable person can be thought of as a justified person, and considers the relevance of this insight for feminist critiques of the test.","PeriodicalId":83159,"journal":{"name":"The Law quarterly review","volume":"131 1","pages":"563-584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Many Faces of the Reasonable Person\",\"authors\":\"J. Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198852940.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviews the various legal contexts in which the reasonable person test may be invoked. Argues that the test supplies extra-legal standards from which courts must attempt to construct legal standards, and discusses why this is deemed a useful adjudicative exercise. Suggests that the reasonable person can be thought of as a justified person, and considers the relevance of this insight for feminist critiques of the test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Law quarterly review\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"563-584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Law quarterly review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852940.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Law quarterly review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852940.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reviews the various legal contexts in which the reasonable person test may be invoked. Argues that the test supplies extra-legal standards from which courts must attempt to construct legal standards, and discusses why this is deemed a useful adjudicative exercise. Suggests that the reasonable person can be thought of as a justified person, and considers the relevance of this insight for feminist critiques of the test.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
