护士主导的痴呆症干预效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000685
Kuei Hsiang Huang, Ita Daryanti Saragih, Ira Suarilah, Nguyen Thi Son, Bih-O Lee
{"title":"护士主导的痴呆症干预效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kuei Hsiang Huang,&nbsp;Ita Daryanti Saragih,&nbsp;Ira Suarilah,&nbsp;Nguyen Thi Son,&nbsp;Bih-O Lee","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses' primary role in clinical settings for persons living with dementia is to lessen the strain of dementia on daily life, monitor comorbidities, and manage medications. However, no comprehensive literature review has investigated the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions for persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of nurse-led dementia interventions and provide an extended range of outcomes related to cognitive function, depression, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of six databases was conducted from database inception to August 10, 2022. Methodologies were evaluated, followed by a pooled analysis using random effects models to explain the effects of nurse-led dementia interventions on patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurse-led interventions were more effective than standard care in alleviating depression and improving quality of life. However, they did not enhance cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nurse-led interventions for dementia alleviate depression and improve quality of life. However, because of lack of randomized controlled trials, the analysis found less effectiveness in improving cognitive function. Therefore, further trials are needed to corroborate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":"72 6","pages":"430-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effects of Nurse-Led Intervention for People With Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Kuei Hsiang Huang,&nbsp;Ita Daryanti Saragih,&nbsp;Ira Suarilah,&nbsp;Nguyen Thi Son,&nbsp;Bih-O Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses' primary role in clinical settings for persons living with dementia is to lessen the strain of dementia on daily life, monitor comorbidities, and manage medications. However, no comprehensive literature review has investigated the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions for persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of nurse-led dementia interventions and provide an extended range of outcomes related to cognitive function, depression, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of six databases was conducted from database inception to August 10, 2022. Methodologies were evaluated, followed by a pooled analysis using random effects models to explain the effects of nurse-led dementia interventions on patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurse-led interventions were more effective than standard care in alleviating depression and improving quality of life. However, they did not enhance cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nurse-led interventions for dementia alleviate depression and improve quality of life. However, because of lack of randomized controlled trials, the analysis found less effectiveness in improving cognitive function. Therefore, further trials are needed to corroborate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"72 6\",\"pages\":\"430-438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000685\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护士在痴呆症患者临床环境中的主要作用是减轻痴呆症对日常生活的压力,监测合并症,并管理药物。然而,没有全面的文献综述调查护士主导的干预措施对痴呆症患者的有效性。目的:本研究的目的是评估护士主导的痴呆症干预效果的随机对照试验,并提供与认知功能、抑郁和生活质量相关的广泛结果。方法:从数据库建立到2022年8月10日,对6个数据库进行了全面的文献检索。对方法进行了评估,然后使用随机效应模型进行汇总分析,以解释护士主导的痴呆症干预对患者的影响。结果:在缓解抑郁和提高生活质量方面,护士主导的干预措施比标准护理更有效。然而,它们并没有提高认知能力。讨论:护士主导的痴呆症干预措施可以缓解抑郁,提高生活质量。然而,由于缺乏随机对照试验,分析发现改善认知功能的效果较差。因此,需要进一步的试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effects of Nurse-Led Intervention for People With Dementia.

Background: Nurses' primary role in clinical settings for persons living with dementia is to lessen the strain of dementia on daily life, monitor comorbidities, and manage medications. However, no comprehensive literature review has investigated the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions for persons living with dementia.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of nurse-led dementia interventions and provide an extended range of outcomes related to cognitive function, depression, and quality of life.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of six databases was conducted from database inception to August 10, 2022. Methodologies were evaluated, followed by a pooled analysis using random effects models to explain the effects of nurse-led dementia interventions on patients.

Results: Nurse-led interventions were more effective than standard care in alleviating depression and improving quality of life. However, they did not enhance cognitive performance.

Discussion: Nurse-led interventions for dementia alleviate depression and improve quality of life. However, because of lack of randomized controlled trials, the analysis found less effectiveness in improving cognitive function. Therefore, further trials are needed to corroborate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
期刊最新文献
Preparing PhD Students for Tenure-Track Faculty Positions. Cognitive Interventions in Heart Failure Segue to Thoughts on Symptom Science in Nursing Research. Health Implications of Black Identity Among Latinos: A Call for Afro-Latina Representation in Maternal Child Health Research. In Search of Nursing Science. Nursing Science and the Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1