脑深部电刺激治疗精神疾病

J. Pilitsis, R. Bakay
{"title":"脑深部电刺激治疗精神疾病","authors":"J. Pilitsis, R. Bakay","doi":"10.1097/01.IDT.0000288127.14560.b9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Additional Reference As a psychiatrist and psychotherapist I read this article with great interest. However, my intention is not actually to comment substantially on the many questions raised by deep brain stimulation (DBS) but to provide a literature reference and give my reasons for doing so. In his book “Tief im Hirn [Deep in the brain],” Helmut Dubiel, who had undergone DBS, published an impressive description of his treatment (1). Although in his case it was Parkinson’s disease that led to his having DBS, not a psychiatric disorder in the narrower sense, this book seems to me to be of great value for the article by Kuhn and colleagues. The doctor in charge of advice and treatment and the reader are given an exact description of the situation of a patient who is treated with DBS. The book is, of course, totally subjective, but also entirely credible and authentic. However: is this science? An idea of the importance of patients’ (or “service users’”, as they are often referred to in English speaking countries) experiences came through in the 2009 schizophrenia guidelines from Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tilmann Steinert comments that in spite of their formal evidence base, these official guidelines influencing English health policy contain substantial qualitative and subjective passages, for example, several detailed case histories giving patients’ own perspectives. Dubiel’s book is such an example of a narrative contribution from a patient. In my opinion, the discussion around DBS would also be of benefit in psychiatric settings. In any case, we should be discussing the option. Dubiel`s book is a fine example of a narrative contribution from a patient. In my opinion, the discussion around DBS would benefit from this in psychiatric illness, too. In any case, we should be discussing the option DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0644a","PeriodicalId":90307,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharm review : timely reports in psychopharmacology and device-based therapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.IDT.0000288127.14560.b9","citationCount":"118","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders\",\"authors\":\"J. Pilitsis, R. Bakay\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.IDT.0000288127.14560.b9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Additional Reference As a psychiatrist and psychotherapist I read this article with great interest. However, my intention is not actually to comment substantially on the many questions raised by deep brain stimulation (DBS) but to provide a literature reference and give my reasons for doing so. In his book “Tief im Hirn [Deep in the brain],” Helmut Dubiel, who had undergone DBS, published an impressive description of his treatment (1). Although in his case it was Parkinson’s disease that led to his having DBS, not a psychiatric disorder in the narrower sense, this book seems to me to be of great value for the article by Kuhn and colleagues. The doctor in charge of advice and treatment and the reader are given an exact description of the situation of a patient who is treated with DBS. The book is, of course, totally subjective, but also entirely credible and authentic. However: is this science? An idea of the importance of patients’ (or “service users’”, as they are often referred to in English speaking countries) experiences came through in the 2009 schizophrenia guidelines from Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tilmann Steinert comments that in spite of their formal evidence base, these official guidelines influencing English health policy contain substantial qualitative and subjective passages, for example, several detailed case histories giving patients’ own perspectives. Dubiel’s book is such an example of a narrative contribution from a patient. In my opinion, the discussion around DBS would also be of benefit in psychiatric settings. In any case, we should be discussing the option. Dubiel`s book is a fine example of a narrative contribution from a patient. In my opinion, the discussion around DBS would benefit from this in psychiatric illness, too. In any case, we should be discussing the option DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0644a\",\"PeriodicalId\":90307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopharm review : timely reports in psychopharmacology and device-based therapies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.IDT.0000288127.14560.b9\",\"citationCount\":\"118\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopharm review : timely reports in psychopharmacology and device-based therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IDT.0000288127.14560.b9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharm review : timely reports in psychopharmacology and device-based therapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IDT.0000288127.14560.b9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 118

摘要

作为一名精神病学家和心理治疗师,我怀着极大的兴趣阅读了这篇文章。然而,我的意图实际上并不是对深部脑刺激(DBS)引发的许多问题进行实质性的评论,而是提供文献参考并给出我这样做的理由。接受过DBS的Helmut Dubiel在他的书《大脑深处》(Tief im Hirn [Deep In brain])中对他的治疗进行了令人印象深刻的描述(1)。虽然在他的案例中,是帕金森病导致了他的DBS,而不是狭义的精神疾病,但在我看来,这本书对库恩及其同事的文章有很大的价值。负责建议和治疗的医生和读者都得到了一个准确的描述病人的情况,谁接受DBS治疗。当然,这本书是完全主观的,但也完全可信和真实。然而,这是科学吗?2009年,英国国家健康与临床卓越研究所(National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence)发布了精神分裂症指南,其中体现了患者(或“服务使用者”,在英语国家经常这样称呼他们)经历的重要性。Tilmann Steinert评论说,尽管他们有正式的证据基础,这些影响英国卫生政策的官方指导方针包含大量定性和主观的段落,例如,几个详细的病例史给出了患者自己的观点。Dubiel的书就是这样一个病人叙述贡献的例子。在我看来,关于DBS的讨论对精神病学也有好处。无论如何,我们应该讨论一下这个选择。Dubiel的书是病人叙述贡献的一个很好的例子。在我看来,围绕DBS的讨论也会从精神疾病中受益。在任何情况下,我们都应该讨论DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0644a选项
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders
Additional Reference As a psychiatrist and psychotherapist I read this article with great interest. However, my intention is not actually to comment substantially on the many questions raised by deep brain stimulation (DBS) but to provide a literature reference and give my reasons for doing so. In his book “Tief im Hirn [Deep in the brain],” Helmut Dubiel, who had undergone DBS, published an impressive description of his treatment (1). Although in his case it was Parkinson’s disease that led to his having DBS, not a psychiatric disorder in the narrower sense, this book seems to me to be of great value for the article by Kuhn and colleagues. The doctor in charge of advice and treatment and the reader are given an exact description of the situation of a patient who is treated with DBS. The book is, of course, totally subjective, but also entirely credible and authentic. However: is this science? An idea of the importance of patients’ (or “service users’”, as they are often referred to in English speaking countries) experiences came through in the 2009 schizophrenia guidelines from Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tilmann Steinert comments that in spite of their formal evidence base, these official guidelines influencing English health policy contain substantial qualitative and subjective passages, for example, several detailed case histories giving patients’ own perspectives. Dubiel’s book is such an example of a narrative contribution from a patient. In my opinion, the discussion around DBS would also be of benefit in psychiatric settings. In any case, we should be discussing the option. Dubiel`s book is a fine example of a narrative contribution from a patient. In my opinion, the discussion around DBS would benefit from this in psychiatric illness, too. In any case, we should be discussing the option DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0644a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Chronic Pain With Psychotropic Medications Psychopharmacologic Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depression Beta-Blockers: Off-Label Use in Psychiatric Disorders Novel Approaches for Managing Schizophrenia: Part I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1