测量移动淋浴马桶可用性的仪器:eMAST 1.0

Emma L. Friesen, D. Theodoros, T. Russell
{"title":"测量移动淋浴马桶可用性的仪器:eMAST 1.0","authors":"Emma L. Friesen, D. Theodoros, T. Russell","doi":"10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nA cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nAs hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThe sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.","PeriodicalId":89962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of assistive technologies","volume":"10 1","pages":"153-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0\",\"authors\":\"Emma L. Friesen, D. Theodoros, T. Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nA cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nAs hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of assistive technologies\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"153-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of assistive technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of assistive technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的对电子移动淋浴器评估工具(eMAST) 1.0进行初步的心理测量学评价。设计/方法/方法对32名18岁或以上的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者进行了横断面验证研究,他们使用移动淋浴器如厕和/或淋浴。通过SurveyMonkey在线进行eMAST 1.0、魁北克用户对辅助技术满意度评估2.0版本(QUEST 2.0)和修改后的系统可用性量表(SUS)。大约7天后重新给药eMAST 1.0。评估了内部一致性、重测信度和收敛效度的心理测量特性。结果与假设一致,eMAST 1.0表现出较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32);可接受的重测信度(类内系数(3,1)=0.75(0.53-0.88,95%置信区间)(n=27));与QUEST 2.0的设备子量表和改进的SUS有很强的正相关(Pearson相关系数分别为0.70和0.63)。该样本在性别或居住状态方面不能完全代表澳大利亚的数据,但在SCI水平方面具有代表性。年龄数据未进行评估。样本量很小,但足以进行初步的心理测量评估。初步的心理测量评估表明,eMAST 1.0是一种有效和可靠的工具,可以衡量成人脊髓损伤患者间充质干细胞的可用性。这可能有助于探索msc的可用性和满意度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Findings As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). Research limitations/implications The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. Originality/value The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technologies That Aid Transportation Ethical Issues in Assistive Technology Enabling Function and Participation With Seating Technologies Technologies That Enable Mobility Sensory Aids for Persons With Visual Impairments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1