历史学家对社会学研究档案资料的使用:关于富裕工人研究的一些观察。

IF 1.1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Twentieth Century British History Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI:10.1093/tcbh/hwac010
John Goldthorpe
{"title":"历史学家对社会学研究档案资料的使用:关于富裕工人研究的一些观察。","authors":"John Goldthorpe","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwac010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of late, historians of twentieth-century Britain have made increasing use of archived material from sociological research. Such use is examined in the case of the Affluent Worker study. It is argued that established historiographical practice needs to be maintained, and careful consideration given to the provenance and purposes of the documentary material that is drawn upon-with close reference to the context, objectives, and design of the original research. So far as the Affluent Worker study is concerned, such a consideration has not always been adequate, and with untoward consequences. Further, where, as with the Affluent Worker study, the original research was of a survey-based, quantitative kind, serious methodological differences regarding data analysis can arise. These become most apparent where the re-use of the relics of such research is aimed at qualifying the conclusions of its authors or at critically 'deconstructing' the research processes in which they were involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":46051,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth Century British History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historians' Uses of Archived Material from Sociological Research: Some Observations with Reference to the Affluent Worker Study.\",\"authors\":\"John Goldthorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tcbh/hwac010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Of late, historians of twentieth-century Britain have made increasing use of archived material from sociological research. Such use is examined in the case of the Affluent Worker study. It is argued that established historiographical practice needs to be maintained, and careful consideration given to the provenance and purposes of the documentary material that is drawn upon-with close reference to the context, objectives, and design of the original research. So far as the Affluent Worker study is concerned, such a consideration has not always been adequate, and with untoward consequences. Further, where, as with the Affluent Worker study, the original research was of a survey-based, quantitative kind, serious methodological differences regarding data analysis can arise. These become most apparent where the re-use of the relics of such research is aimed at qualifying the conclusions of its authors or at critically 'deconstructing' the research processes in which they were involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twentieth Century British History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twentieth Century British History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwac010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth Century British History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwac010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近来,二十世纪英国历史学家越来越多地使用社会学研究的档案材料。本文以 "富裕工人 "研究为例,探讨了这种使用方式。本文认为,需要坚持既定的史学实践,并仔细考虑所利用的文献资料的来源和目的,同时密切关注原始研究的背景、目标和设计。就 "富裕工人 "研究而言,这种考虑并不总是充分的,而且造成了不良后果。此外,与富裕工人研究一样,如果原始研究是以调查为基础的定量研究,那么在数据分析方 法上就会出现严重分歧。如果重新使用此类研究的遗物是为了对其作者的结论进行定性,或对其参与的研究过程进行批判性的 "解构",那么这些分歧就会变得最为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Historians' Uses of Archived Material from Sociological Research: Some Observations with Reference to the Affluent Worker Study.

Of late, historians of twentieth-century Britain have made increasing use of archived material from sociological research. Such use is examined in the case of the Affluent Worker study. It is argued that established historiographical practice needs to be maintained, and careful consideration given to the provenance and purposes of the documentary material that is drawn upon-with close reference to the context, objectives, and design of the original research. So far as the Affluent Worker study is concerned, such a consideration has not always been adequate, and with untoward consequences. Further, where, as with the Affluent Worker study, the original research was of a survey-based, quantitative kind, serious methodological differences regarding data analysis can arise. These become most apparent where the re-use of the relics of such research is aimed at qualifying the conclusions of its authors or at critically 'deconstructing' the research processes in which they were involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Twentieth Century British History covers the variety of British history in the twentieth century in all its aspects. It links the many different and specialized branches of historical scholarship with work in political science and related disciplines. The journal seeks to transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries, in order to foster the study of patterns of change and continuity across the twentieth century. The editors are committed to publishing work that examines the British experience within a comparative context, whether European or Anglo-American.
期刊最新文献
Imagining Economic Growth in Post-War Britain. Duncan Tanner Essay Prize Winner 2022. Going Up in Smoke: Tobacco and Government Policy in the Age of Austerity, 1945-50. The European Dimension of the 'talks process' in Northern Ireland. Mass-Observation and Vernacular Politics at the 1945 General Election.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1