盈利或亏损。

Jes E. Schlaikjer
{"title":"盈利或亏损。","authors":"Jes E. Schlaikjer","doi":"10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE) is a nonprofit organization. Yet, there is one profit motive that forms the very basis for the existence of The IRE and is the fundamental reason for its growth to about 80,000 members. This is the profit enjoyed by each member of the IRE in reading its publications and attending its meetings. The profit is two-fold, for the member enjoys enhanced prestige by association of his name with the IRE and he has the opportunity of increasing the depth of his technical knowledge. The last time this writer counted, there were almost 30 of these Professional Groups in The Institute. Laying aside for present purposes the question of whether there ought to be so many groups, we come to the problem of competition among the groups. Some have held that unlimited competition is a good thing because of its stimulating effect. This writer contends that this is not true in a membership organization like The Institute, which has as a primary function mutual education, not competition. Each Professional Group provides a forum through which engineers especially interested in one aspect of the broad scope of the IRE can be assured of being kept up to date in that field without delving through all the literature in the adjacent and distant fields. If the scopes of the groups are permitted to overlap greatly, the entire reason for the formation of separate groups is lost. In areas where groups overlap, assuming that there is no desire on the part of these groups to merge, it is suggested that cooperation by such means as joint symposia and publications, rather than competition, will yield the greater mutual profit.","PeriodicalId":72490,"journal":{"name":"California state journal of medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1960-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097595","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROFIT OR LOSS.\",\"authors\":\"Jes E. Schlaikjer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE) is a nonprofit organization. Yet, there is one profit motive that forms the very basis for the existence of The IRE and is the fundamental reason for its growth to about 80,000 members. This is the profit enjoyed by each member of the IRE in reading its publications and attending its meetings. The profit is two-fold, for the member enjoys enhanced prestige by association of his name with the IRE and he has the opportunity of increasing the depth of his technical knowledge. The last time this writer counted, there were almost 30 of these Professional Groups in The Institute. Laying aside for present purposes the question of whether there ought to be so many groups, we come to the problem of competition among the groups. Some have held that unlimited competition is a good thing because of its stimulating effect. This writer contends that this is not true in a membership organization like The Institute, which has as a primary function mutual education, not competition. Each Professional Group provides a forum through which engineers especially interested in one aspect of the broad scope of the IRE can be assured of being kept up to date in that field without delving through all the literature in the adjacent and distant fields. If the scopes of the groups are permitted to overlap greatly, the entire reason for the formation of separate groups is lost. In areas where groups overlap, assuming that there is no desire on the part of these groups to merge, it is suggested that cooperation by such means as joint symposia and publications, rather than competition, will yield the greater mutual profit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"California state journal of medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1960-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097595\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"California state journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California state journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

无线电工程师协会(IRE)是一个非营利性组织。然而,有一个利润动机构成了IRE存在的基础,也是其增长到约8万名会员的根本原因。这是每名成员在阅读其刊物和出席其会议时所享有的利润。这样做的好处是双重的,因为会员可以通过与协会联系而获得更高的声誉,而且他有机会增加他的技术知识的深度。笔者上一次统计的时候,该研究所有近30个这样的专业小组。暂时把是否应该有这么多群体的问题放在一边,我们来讨论群体之间的竞争问题。一些人认为无限制的竞争是一件好事,因为它有刺激作用。作者认为,在协会这样的会员制组织中,情况并非如此,因为协会的主要功能是相互教育,而不是竞争。每个专业小组都提供了一个论坛,通过这个论坛,对IRE广泛范围的某一方面特别感兴趣的工程师可以确保在该领域保持最新状态,而无需深入研究邻近和遥远领域的所有文献。如果允许这些群体的范围有很大的重叠,那么形成独立群体的全部理由就丧失了。在集团重叠的领域,假设这些集团没有合并的愿望,建议通过联合专题讨论会和出版物等方式进行合作,而不是竞争,将产生更大的共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PROFIT OR LOSS.
The Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE) is a nonprofit organization. Yet, there is one profit motive that forms the very basis for the existence of The IRE and is the fundamental reason for its growth to about 80,000 members. This is the profit enjoyed by each member of the IRE in reading its publications and attending its meetings. The profit is two-fold, for the member enjoys enhanced prestige by association of his name with the IRE and he has the opportunity of increasing the depth of his technical knowledge. The last time this writer counted, there were almost 30 of these Professional Groups in The Institute. Laying aside for present purposes the question of whether there ought to be so many groups, we come to the problem of competition among the groups. Some have held that unlimited competition is a good thing because of its stimulating effect. This writer contends that this is not true in a membership organization like The Institute, which has as a primary function mutual education, not competition. Each Professional Group provides a forum through which engineers especially interested in one aspect of the broad scope of the IRE can be assured of being kept up to date in that field without delving through all the literature in the adjacent and distant fields. If the scopes of the groups are permitted to overlap greatly, the entire reason for the formation of separate groups is lost. In areas where groups overlap, assuming that there is no desire on the part of these groups to merge, it is suggested that cooperation by such means as joint symposia and publications, rather than competition, will yield the greater mutual profit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Address Unknown. A MISUNDERSTANDING. Headache as a Symptom. Social Insurance Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1