{"title":"关于代数解结数","authors":"Maciej Borodzik, Stefan Friedl","doi":"10.1112/tlms/tlu004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The algebraic unknotting number ua(K) of a knot K was introduced by Hitoshi Murakami. It equals the minimal number of crossing changes needed to turn K into an Alexander polynomial one knot. In a previous paper, the authors used the Blanchfield form of a knot K to define an invariant n(K) and proved that n(K)⩽ua(K) . They also showed that n(K) subsumes all previous classical lower bounds on the (algebraic) unknotting number. In this paper, we prove that n(K)=ua(K) .","PeriodicalId":41208,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the London Mathematical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1112/tlms/tlu004","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the algebraic unknotting number\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Borodzik, Stefan Friedl\",\"doi\":\"10.1112/tlms/tlu004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The algebraic unknotting number ua(K) of a knot K was introduced by Hitoshi Murakami. It equals the minimal number of crossing changes needed to turn K into an Alexander polynomial one knot. In a previous paper, the authors used the Blanchfield form of a knot K to define an invariant n(K) and proved that n(K)⩽ua(K) . They also showed that n(K) subsumes all previous classical lower bounds on the (algebraic) unknotting number. In this paper, we prove that n(K)=ua(K) .\",\"PeriodicalId\":41208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the London Mathematical Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1112/tlms/tlu004\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the London Mathematical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1112/tlms/tlu004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the London Mathematical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1112/tlms/tlu004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The algebraic unknotting number ua(K) of a knot K was introduced by Hitoshi Murakami. It equals the minimal number of crossing changes needed to turn K into an Alexander polynomial one knot. In a previous paper, the authors used the Blanchfield form of a knot K to define an invariant n(K) and proved that n(K)⩽ua(K) . They also showed that n(K) subsumes all previous classical lower bounds on the (algebraic) unknotting number. In this paper, we prove that n(K)=ua(K) .