社会棱镜:育儿手册的国际比较

S. Boocock
{"title":"社会棱镜:育儿手册的国际比较","authors":"S. Boocock","doi":"10.1111/J.1475-6781.1999.TB00062.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract  This paper presents findings from a comparative study of childrearing values and practices in four countries–Japan, People's Republic of China, France, and United States–based upon a content analysis of the ten best-selling childrearing manuals in each country during the last decade of the twentieth century. A uniform set of procedures was used to classify and analyze the content of the manuals. Selected findings are discussed regarding: (1) management of the child's body and bodily functions: 12) management and shaping of the child's behavior; and (3) roles and role relationships within the family and outside. \n \nWhile cultural differences remain, two general trends emerge from the analysis. One is a trend toward more flexible child care practices and greater sensitivity to the character and needs of the individual child. The second is a convergence of opinion on many aspects of children's upbringing. Global trends that are affecting the production and dissemination of childrearing advice are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":43424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1475-6781.1999.TB00062.X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOCIAL PRISMS: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF CHILDREARING MANUALS\",\"authors\":\"S. Boocock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1475-6781.1999.TB00062.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract  This paper presents findings from a comparative study of childrearing values and practices in four countries–Japan, People's Republic of China, France, and United States–based upon a content analysis of the ten best-selling childrearing manuals in each country during the last decade of the twentieth century. A uniform set of procedures was used to classify and analyze the content of the manuals. Selected findings are discussed regarding: (1) management of the child's body and bodily functions: 12) management and shaping of the child's behavior; and (3) roles and role relationships within the family and outside. \\n \\nWhile cultural differences remain, two general trends emerge from the analysis. One is a trend toward more flexible child care practices and greater sensitivity to the character and needs of the individual child. The second is a convergence of opinion on many aspects of children's upbringing. Global trends that are affecting the production and dissemination of childrearing advice are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Japanese Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1475-6781.1999.TB00062.X\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Japanese Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6781.1999.TB00062.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6781.1999.TB00062.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:本文通过对20世纪最后十年各国十大畅销育儿手册的内容分析,对日本、中华人民共和国、法国和美国四个国家的育儿价值观和育儿实践进行了比较研究。使用一套统一的程序对手册的内容进行分类和分析。本文讨论了以下方面的研究结果:(1)对儿童身体和身体功能的管理;(12)对儿童行为的管理和塑造;(3)家庭内外的角色和角色关系。虽然文化差异仍然存在,但从分析中可以看出两大趋势。一个趋势是更灵活的儿童保育做法和对儿童个体的特点和需要的更敏感。第二是对儿童教育的许多方面的意见趋于一致。还讨论了影响育儿咨询意见制作和传播的全球趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SOCIAL PRISMS: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF CHILDREARING MANUALS
Abstract  This paper presents findings from a comparative study of childrearing values and practices in four countries–Japan, People's Republic of China, France, and United States–based upon a content analysis of the ten best-selling childrearing manuals in each country during the last decade of the twentieth century. A uniform set of procedures was used to classify and analyze the content of the manuals. Selected findings are discussed regarding: (1) management of the child's body and bodily functions: 12) management and shaping of the child's behavior; and (3) roles and role relationships within the family and outside. While cultural differences remain, two general trends emerge from the analysis. One is a trend toward more flexible child care practices and greater sensitivity to the character and needs of the individual child. The second is a convergence of opinion on many aspects of children's upbringing. Global trends that are affecting the production and dissemination of childrearing advice are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Tokyo's Gentrification in Context Time Difference Gentrification as a Bloodless Revolution : Class Structure and Spatial Polarization in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area after the 1980s Gentrification without Gentry in a Declining Global City?: Vertical Expansion of Tokyo and Its Urban Meaning 1 Recentralization of Tokyo: Contradiction and Political Struggle for Regional Policy in Japan Rethinking Gentrification and the Right to the City: The Process and Effect of the Urban Social Movement against Redevelopment in Tokyo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1