论群体行为的客观研究

L. Hogben
{"title":"论群体行为的客观研究","authors":"L. Hogben","doi":"10.1136/JECH.6.2.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this brochure Professor Penrose puts forward one novel, challenging, and highly original idea buried in a banal matrix of tedious metaphor and metalepsis about the behaviour of men in groups and their reactions to micro-organisms and viruses. Those who fail to derive any profit from the analogy between crowd diseases as Greenwood uses the term and crowd disorders as Penrose does may also miss the point which makes the publication of the essay more than worth while. True to the Galton Laboratory tradition, the author assumes that the reader, if also a mathematician, will immediately grasp the statistical theory he advances; and, if not, will be too dumb to do so. This is a pity, because a public of thoughtful people is getting more and more suspicious of statistical generalizations advanced for allegedly adequate theoretical reasons when there is, as for the so-called cube law, merely a somewhat exiguous empirical basis to support them. The Penrose square-root law has also to do with voting; and what follows is an attempt to fill in the argument which the author himself does not deign to elaborate. The elaboration is all the more pertinent because his hope that the reader \"will tolerate the necessary introduction of mathematical notation\" (p. 6) immediately precedes three gross errors in the formulae which follow, viz.:","PeriodicalId":84321,"journal":{"name":"British journal of social medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"159 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1952-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/JECH.6.2.159","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Objective Study of Crowd Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"L. Hogben\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/JECH.6.2.159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this brochure Professor Penrose puts forward one novel, challenging, and highly original idea buried in a banal matrix of tedious metaphor and metalepsis about the behaviour of men in groups and their reactions to micro-organisms and viruses. Those who fail to derive any profit from the analogy between crowd diseases as Greenwood uses the term and crowd disorders as Penrose does may also miss the point which makes the publication of the essay more than worth while. True to the Galton Laboratory tradition, the author assumes that the reader, if also a mathematician, will immediately grasp the statistical theory he advances; and, if not, will be too dumb to do so. This is a pity, because a public of thoughtful people is getting more and more suspicious of statistical generalizations advanced for allegedly adequate theoretical reasons when there is, as for the so-called cube law, merely a somewhat exiguous empirical basis to support them. The Penrose square-root law has also to do with voting; and what follows is an attempt to fill in the argument which the author himself does not deign to elaborate. The elaboration is all the more pertinent because his hope that the reader \\\"will tolerate the necessary introduction of mathematical notation\\\" (p. 6) immediately precedes three gross errors in the formulae which follow, viz.:\",\"PeriodicalId\":84321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of social medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1952-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/JECH.6.2.159\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.6.2.159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.6.2.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

摘要

在这本小册子中,彭罗斯教授提出了一个新颖的、具有挑战性的、极具独创性的观点,它被隐藏在单调乏味的隐喻和对人类群体行为及其对微生物和病毒的反应的刻板印象中。那些未能从格林伍德所使用的群体疾病和彭罗斯所使用的群体失调之间的类比中获得任何利益的人,也可能错过了让这篇文章的发表更加值得的一点。忠实于高尔顿实验室的传统,作者假设读者,如果也是一位数学家,将立即掌握他提出的统计理论;如果不这样做,他们就会太笨而不能这样做。这是一个遗憾,因为一群有思想的公众越来越怀疑那些以所谓充分的理论理由提出的统计概括,而实际上,就像所谓的立方体定律一样,只有多少缺乏经验基础来支持它们。彭罗斯平方根法也与投票有关;接下来的内容是试图填补作者本人不愿详细阐述的论点。由于他希望读者“能够容忍必要的数学符号的引入”(第6页),因此他的阐述更加中肯,因为他希望读者“能够容忍必要的数学符号的引入”(第6页)紧随其后的公式中有三个严重的错误,即:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Objective Study of Crowd Behaviour
In this brochure Professor Penrose puts forward one novel, challenging, and highly original idea buried in a banal matrix of tedious metaphor and metalepsis about the behaviour of men in groups and their reactions to micro-organisms and viruses. Those who fail to derive any profit from the analogy between crowd diseases as Greenwood uses the term and crowd disorders as Penrose does may also miss the point which makes the publication of the essay more than worth while. True to the Galton Laboratory tradition, the author assumes that the reader, if also a mathematician, will immediately grasp the statistical theory he advances; and, if not, will be too dumb to do so. This is a pity, because a public of thoughtful people is getting more and more suspicious of statistical generalizations advanced for allegedly adequate theoretical reasons when there is, as for the so-called cube law, merely a somewhat exiguous empirical basis to support them. The Penrose square-root law has also to do with voting; and what follows is an attempt to fill in the argument which the author himself does not deign to elaborate. The elaboration is all the more pertinent because his hope that the reader "will tolerate the necessary introduction of mathematical notation" (p. 6) immediately precedes three gross errors in the formulae which follow, viz.:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical theory of prophylactic and therapeutic trials. II. Methods of operational advantage. Cohort analysis of fertility in England and Wales, 1939-50. Stature of Scotsmen aged 18 to 40 years in 1941. Incidence of neurosis related to maternal age and birth order. Factors influencing sex differences in mortality from respiratory tuberculosis in England and Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1