{"title":"临床分离的gergovie肠杆菌对多种抗菌药物的敏感性","authors":"Y. Masuda, M. Shinohara, K. Ohura","doi":"10.11263/JSOTP1982.26.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated the antimicrobial susceptibilities of Enterobacter gergoviae using 12 strains that were isolated from a tooth with periapical lesion. Antibacterial activity was estimated using minimum inhibitory concentrations. Antimicrobial agents examined were gentamicin (GM), cefalotin (CET), sulbactam ampicillin (SBT/ABPC), ampicillin (ABPC), ofloxacin (OFLX), and erythromycin (EM). GM, OFLX and EM showed high sensitivity in comparison with ATCC 33028.","PeriodicalId":19590,"journal":{"name":"Oral Therapeutics and Pharmacology","volume":"26 1","pages":"73-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of clinically isolated Enterobacter gergoviae to various antibacterial agents\",\"authors\":\"Y. Masuda, M. Shinohara, K. Ohura\",\"doi\":\"10.11263/JSOTP1982.26.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated the antimicrobial susceptibilities of Enterobacter gergoviae using 12 strains that were isolated from a tooth with periapical lesion. Antibacterial activity was estimated using minimum inhibitory concentrations. Antimicrobial agents examined were gentamicin (GM), cefalotin (CET), sulbactam ampicillin (SBT/ABPC), ampicillin (ABPC), ofloxacin (OFLX), and erythromycin (EM). GM, OFLX and EM showed high sensitivity in comparison with ATCC 33028.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Therapeutics and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"73-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Therapeutics and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11263/JSOTP1982.26.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Therapeutics and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11263/JSOTP1982.26.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensitivity of clinically isolated Enterobacter gergoviae to various antibacterial agents
We investigated the antimicrobial susceptibilities of Enterobacter gergoviae using 12 strains that were isolated from a tooth with periapical lesion. Antibacterial activity was estimated using minimum inhibitory concentrations. Antimicrobial agents examined were gentamicin (GM), cefalotin (CET), sulbactam ampicillin (SBT/ABPC), ampicillin (ABPC), ofloxacin (OFLX), and erythromycin (EM). GM, OFLX and EM showed high sensitivity in comparison with ATCC 33028.