{"title":"德国软水流中的变色龙物种:发生、生态学和生物指示用途","authors":"A. Gutowski, J. Foerster, A. Doege, M. Paul","doi":"10.1127/ALGOL_STUD/2015/0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyzed the records of several species of Chamaesiphon A. Braun ex Grunow 1865 collected by the water management authorities of the German federal states North RhineWestphalia (NRW) and Saxony (SN). In total, 579 sampling events from 429 different sampling sites at soft water streams and rivers of the Central German Uplands (types 5, 5.1 and 9 of the German typology for running waters) were included. Samples were collected between 2006 and 2012. Sites ranged from unimpaired, nutrient-poor to nutrient-rich sites. Twelve different species of Chamaesiphon were recorded. The epiphytic species C. confervicolus and C. incrustans and the epilithic species C. fuscus, C. polymorphus and C. starmachii were most common in both federal states. Uni- and multivariate methods were employed to describe autecological preferences of these taxa. C. fuscus and C. starmachii occur at significantly lower nutrient levels and therefore are characteristic for unimpaired sites, whereas C. confervicolus, C. incrustans and C. polymorphus prefer nutrient-rich sites. C. confervicolus and C. incrustans are different in respect of the morphological features of the sampling sites like stream width, depth and substrate. C. polonicus which occurs in the medium range regarding nutrients and geochemical properties is known to be a tolerant species. The use of Chamaesiphon species for assessment and especially their classification within the PHYLIB tool is discussed.","PeriodicalId":90782,"journal":{"name":"Algological studies (Stuttgart, Germany : 2007)","volume":"30 1","pages":"33-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1127/ALGOL_STUD/2015/0220","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chamaesiphon species in soft-water streams in Germany: occurrence, ecology and use for bioindication\",\"authors\":\"A. Gutowski, J. Foerster, A. Doege, M. Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.1127/ALGOL_STUD/2015/0220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyzed the records of several species of Chamaesiphon A. Braun ex Grunow 1865 collected by the water management authorities of the German federal states North RhineWestphalia (NRW) and Saxony (SN). In total, 579 sampling events from 429 different sampling sites at soft water streams and rivers of the Central German Uplands (types 5, 5.1 and 9 of the German typology for running waters) were included. Samples were collected between 2006 and 2012. Sites ranged from unimpaired, nutrient-poor to nutrient-rich sites. Twelve different species of Chamaesiphon were recorded. The epiphytic species C. confervicolus and C. incrustans and the epilithic species C. fuscus, C. polymorphus and C. starmachii were most common in both federal states. Uni- and multivariate methods were employed to describe autecological preferences of these taxa. C. fuscus and C. starmachii occur at significantly lower nutrient levels and therefore are characteristic for unimpaired sites, whereas C. confervicolus, C. incrustans and C. polymorphus prefer nutrient-rich sites. C. confervicolus and C. incrustans are different in respect of the morphological features of the sampling sites like stream width, depth and substrate. C. polonicus which occurs in the medium range regarding nutrients and geochemical properties is known to be a tolerant species. The use of Chamaesiphon species for assessment and especially their classification within the PHYLIB tool is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algological studies (Stuttgart, Germany : 2007)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"33-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1127/ALGOL_STUD/2015/0220\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algological studies (Stuttgart, Germany : 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1127/ALGOL_STUD/2015/0220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algological studies (Stuttgart, Germany : 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/ALGOL_STUD/2015/0220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
对德国北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州(NRW)和萨克森州(SN)水管理部门收集的Chamaesiphon A. Braun ex Grunow 1865的几种记录进行了分析。总共包括来自德国中部高地的429个不同采样点的579个采样事件(德国流水类型的第5、5.1和9类)。样本是在2006年至2012年间收集的。从未受损的、营养不良的到营养丰富的都有。记录了12种不同的变色龙。附生种C. convicolus和C. incrustans以及附生种C. fuscus、C. polymorphus和C. starmachi在两个联邦州最常见。采用单变量和多变量方法描述了这些分类群的生态偏好。fuscus C.和starmachi C.发生在营养水平明显较低的地方,因此是未受损地点的特征,而C. convicolus、C. incrustans和C. polymorphus偏爱营养丰富的地点。在采样点的溪流宽度、深度和底质等形态特征上,扁卷木和壳状木存在差异。在营养成分和地球化学性质方面处于中等水平,是一种耐受性较强的物种。本文讨论了在PHYLIB工具中对变色龙物种进行评估和分类的方法。
Chamaesiphon species in soft-water streams in Germany: occurrence, ecology and use for bioindication
We analyzed the records of several species of Chamaesiphon A. Braun ex Grunow 1865 collected by the water management authorities of the German federal states North RhineWestphalia (NRW) and Saxony (SN). In total, 579 sampling events from 429 different sampling sites at soft water streams and rivers of the Central German Uplands (types 5, 5.1 and 9 of the German typology for running waters) were included. Samples were collected between 2006 and 2012. Sites ranged from unimpaired, nutrient-poor to nutrient-rich sites. Twelve different species of Chamaesiphon were recorded. The epiphytic species C. confervicolus and C. incrustans and the epilithic species C. fuscus, C. polymorphus and C. starmachii were most common in both federal states. Uni- and multivariate methods were employed to describe autecological preferences of these taxa. C. fuscus and C. starmachii occur at significantly lower nutrient levels and therefore are characteristic for unimpaired sites, whereas C. confervicolus, C. incrustans and C. polymorphus prefer nutrient-rich sites. C. confervicolus and C. incrustans are different in respect of the morphological features of the sampling sites like stream width, depth and substrate. C. polonicus which occurs in the medium range regarding nutrients and geochemical properties is known to be a tolerant species. The use of Chamaesiphon species for assessment and especially their classification within the PHYLIB tool is discussed.