克服运动中的性别障碍——冒险/高风险运动的机遇?

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sociology of Sport Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1123/ssj.2021-0065
A. Frühauf, Christiane Pahlke, M. Kopp
{"title":"克服运动中的性别障碍——冒险/高风险运动的机遇?","authors":"A. Frühauf, Christiane Pahlke, M. Kopp","doi":"10.1123/ssj.2021-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adventure/high risk sports (AHRS) were developed in a different social context and are usually not separated by sex which might lead to differences in gender-related experiences. This study qualitatively compared 10 female traditional sport participants (soccer players) with 10 female AHRS participants (trad climbers [TC]) regarding their experience of possible gender-related advantages and disadvantages in their sports. The TC climbed with more male partners. The TC reported to not consider gender as a determining factor in the choice of climbing partner or their trad climbing experience. The TC mentioned more female advantages in their sport participation and reported fewer gender-related barriers than soccer players. Differences might be explained through mixed gender sports participation and the differing demands in TC. Unlike traditional sports, AHRS does not imply defeating an opponent. The challenge in AHRS is set by the participant and the environmental conditions, which seem to be less related to sex and gender.","PeriodicalId":49508,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Sport Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming Gender Barriers in Sports—An Opportunity of Adventure/High Risk Sports?\",\"authors\":\"A. Frühauf, Christiane Pahlke, M. Kopp\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/ssj.2021-0065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adventure/high risk sports (AHRS) were developed in a different social context and are usually not separated by sex which might lead to differences in gender-related experiences. This study qualitatively compared 10 female traditional sport participants (soccer players) with 10 female AHRS participants (trad climbers [TC]) regarding their experience of possible gender-related advantages and disadvantages in their sports. The TC climbed with more male partners. The TC reported to not consider gender as a determining factor in the choice of climbing partner or their trad climbing experience. The TC mentioned more female advantages in their sport participation and reported fewer gender-related barriers than soccer players. Differences might be explained through mixed gender sports participation and the differing demands in TC. Unlike traditional sports, AHRS does not imply defeating an opponent. The challenge in AHRS is set by the participant and the environmental conditions, which seem to be less related to sex and gender.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of Sport Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of Sport Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2021-0065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Sport Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2021-0065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

冒险/高风险运动(AHRS)是在不同的社会背景下发展起来的,通常不以性别区分,这可能导致性别相关体验的差异。本研究定性比较了10名女性传统运动参与者(足球运动员)和10名女性AHRS参与者(攀岩运动员[TC])在运动中可能存在的与性别相关的优势和劣势。TC与更多的男性伙伴一起爬升。TC报告说,在选择攀岩伙伴或他们的攀岩经验时,性别不是一个决定因素。与足球运动员相比,女性在参与体育运动方面有更多的优势,并报告了更少的性别障碍。这一差异可以通过男女混合体育参与和不同的技术要求来解释。与传统体育不同,AHRS并不意味着要打败对手。AHRS中的挑战是由参与者和环境条件决定的,这似乎与性别和性别的关系不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overcoming Gender Barriers in Sports—An Opportunity of Adventure/High Risk Sports?
Adventure/high risk sports (AHRS) were developed in a different social context and are usually not separated by sex which might lead to differences in gender-related experiences. This study qualitatively compared 10 female traditional sport participants (soccer players) with 10 female AHRS participants (trad climbers [TC]) regarding their experience of possible gender-related advantages and disadvantages in their sports. The TC climbed with more male partners. The TC reported to not consider gender as a determining factor in the choice of climbing partner or their trad climbing experience. The TC mentioned more female advantages in their sport participation and reported fewer gender-related barriers than soccer players. Differences might be explained through mixed gender sports participation and the differing demands in TC. Unlike traditional sports, AHRS does not imply defeating an opponent. The challenge in AHRS is set by the participant and the environmental conditions, which seem to be less related to sex and gender.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology of Sport Journal
Sociology of Sport Journal 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
29.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published four times a year (March, June, September, December), the Sociology of Sport Journal (SSJ) publishes original research, framed by social theory, on exercise, sport, physical culture, and the (physically active) body. Analyses from diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives are encouraged to stimulate further research, critical thought, and theory development on topics ranging in broad scope from global professional sport, coaching, commercial exercise/fitness, and recreational physical activity. The journal publishes an array of peer-reviewed research articles, research notes, and book reviews. Members of the North American Society for the Sociology of Sport (NASSS) receive SSJ as part of their membership.
期刊最新文献
What Are the Olympics For? The Carceral Logic of Female Eligibility Policies: Gender as a Civilizing Narrative, the Science of Sex Testing, and Anti-Trans Legislation 1 The National Collegiate Athletic Association and the Exploitation of College Profit-Athletes: An Amateurism That Never Was A New Typology of Out-of-School Youth Sports in 21st Century America: The Contrasting Organizational Logics of “Sport-Focused” and “Sport-for-Development” Programming Under Neoliberal Conditions Embodied Cultural Capital, Social Class, Race and Ethnicity, and Sports Performance in Girls Soccer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1