2018年我们应该使用地高辛吗?

Q2 Medicine Heart Asia Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28
G. Karthikeyan
{"title":"2018年我们应该使用地高辛吗?","authors":"G. Karthikeyan","doi":"10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digoxin is often used in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) with or without atrial fibrillation (AF). There is sound biological rationale for the use of digoxin, but the data on clinical outcomes with digoxin use in this patient population are conflicting. There is a single adequately powered randomised trial of digoxin in patients with HF in sinus rhythm.1 This trial showed a small but significant reduction in the rate of hospitalisation due to HF with the use of digoxin, when compared to placebo, among patients treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. There was no effect on mortality.1 On the contrary, there are numerous secondary analyses of observational data from randomised trials which suggest that there may be an increased risk of death from using digoxin, both in patients with HF, those in AF, or both.2 However, observational data on digoxin use suffer from treatment bias (confounding by indication), as the sickest patients are the ones who are prescribed digoxin. Propensity matched analyses have been attempted to overcome the effect of this bias with conflicting results.2 3 However, it is likely that because the magnitude of this bias is large, no amount of statistical adjustment can yield reliable effect estimates. This highlights the need for large, randomised trials of digoxin.3 References Digitalis Investigation G. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 1997;336:525–533. Ziff OJ, Lane DA, Samra M, Griffith M, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Steeds RP, Townend J, Kotecha D. Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data. BMJ 2015;351:h4451. Karthikeyan G, Devasenapathy N, Zühlke L, Engel ME, Rangarajan S, Teo KK, Mayosi BM, Yusuf S; Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (REMEDY) Investigators. Digoxin and clinical outcomes in the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry. Heart 2018 Sep 12. pii: heartjnl-2018-313614.","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":"A12 - A12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"28 Should we be using digoxin in 2018?\",\"authors\":\"G. Karthikeyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digoxin is often used in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) with or without atrial fibrillation (AF). There is sound biological rationale for the use of digoxin, but the data on clinical outcomes with digoxin use in this patient population are conflicting. There is a single adequately powered randomised trial of digoxin in patients with HF in sinus rhythm.1 This trial showed a small but significant reduction in the rate of hospitalisation due to HF with the use of digoxin, when compared to placebo, among patients treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. There was no effect on mortality.1 On the contrary, there are numerous secondary analyses of observational data from randomised trials which suggest that there may be an increased risk of death from using digoxin, both in patients with HF, those in AF, or both.2 However, observational data on digoxin use suffer from treatment bias (confounding by indication), as the sickest patients are the ones who are prescribed digoxin. Propensity matched analyses have been attempted to overcome the effect of this bias with conflicting results.2 3 However, it is likely that because the magnitude of this bias is large, no amount of statistical adjustment can yield reliable effect estimates. This highlights the need for large, randomised trials of digoxin.3 References Digitalis Investigation G. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 1997;336:525–533. Ziff OJ, Lane DA, Samra M, Griffith M, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Steeds RP, Townend J, Kotecha D. Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data. BMJ 2015;351:h4451. Karthikeyan G, Devasenapathy N, Zühlke L, Engel ME, Rangarajan S, Teo KK, Mayosi BM, Yusuf S; Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (REMEDY) Investigators. Digoxin and clinical outcomes in the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry. Heart 2018 Sep 12. pii: heartjnl-2018-313614.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Asia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"A12 - A12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTASIA-2019-APAHFF.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地高辛常用于伴有或不伴有心房颤动(AF)的心力衰竭(HF)患者的治疗。使用地高辛有良好的生物学基础,但在该患者群体中使用地高辛的临床结果数据是相互矛盾的。有一项单独的充分有力的随机试验,地高辛治疗伴有窦性心律失常的HF患者该试验显示,与安慰剂相比,在接受ACE抑制剂和利尿剂治疗的患者中,使用地高辛治疗HF的住院率虽小但显著降低。对死亡率没有影响相反,对随机试验观察性数据的大量二次分析表明,使用地高辛可能会增加心衰患者、房颤患者或两者的死亡风险然而,关于地高辛使用的观察性数据存在治疗偏倚(指征混淆),因为病情最严重的患者是服用地高辛的患者。倾向匹配分析已经试图克服这种偏差的影响与矛盾的结果。然而,由于这种偏差的幅度很大,很可能再多的统计调整也无法产生可靠的效果估计。这凸显了对地高辛进行大规模随机试验的必要性G.地高辛对心力衰竭患者死亡率和发病率的影响。中华医学杂志(英文版)1997;33:525 - 533。Ziff OJ, Lane DA, Samra M, Griffith M, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Steeds RP, Townend J, Kotecha D.地高辛的安全性和有效性:系统评价和观察性和对照试验数据的meta分析。BMJ 2015; 351: h4451。Karthikeyan G, Devasenapathy N, z hlke L, Engel ME, Rangarajan S, Teo KK, Mayosi BM, Yusuf S;全球风湿性心脏病登记(REMEDY)调查人员。地高辛和全球风湿性心脏病登记的临床结果。心脏2018年9月12日。pii: heartjnl - 2018 - 313614。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
28 Should we be using digoxin in 2018?
Digoxin is often used in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) with or without atrial fibrillation (AF). There is sound biological rationale for the use of digoxin, but the data on clinical outcomes with digoxin use in this patient population are conflicting. There is a single adequately powered randomised trial of digoxin in patients with HF in sinus rhythm.1 This trial showed a small but significant reduction in the rate of hospitalisation due to HF with the use of digoxin, when compared to placebo, among patients treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. There was no effect on mortality.1 On the contrary, there are numerous secondary analyses of observational data from randomised trials which suggest that there may be an increased risk of death from using digoxin, both in patients with HF, those in AF, or both.2 However, observational data on digoxin use suffer from treatment bias (confounding by indication), as the sickest patients are the ones who are prescribed digoxin. Propensity matched analyses have been attempted to overcome the effect of this bias with conflicting results.2 3 However, it is likely that because the magnitude of this bias is large, no amount of statistical adjustment can yield reliable effect estimates. This highlights the need for large, randomised trials of digoxin.3 References Digitalis Investigation G. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 1997;336:525–533. Ziff OJ, Lane DA, Samra M, Griffith M, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Steeds RP, Townend J, Kotecha D. Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data. BMJ 2015;351:h4451. Karthikeyan G, Devasenapathy N, Zühlke L, Engel ME, Rangarajan S, Teo KK, Mayosi BM, Yusuf S; Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (REMEDY) Investigators. Digoxin and clinical outcomes in the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry. Heart 2018 Sep 12. pii: heartjnl-2018-313614.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren Clinical consequences of poor adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: can we do better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1