预测神经元反应的多感觉增强

B. Rowland
{"title":"预测神经元反应的多感觉增强","authors":"B. Rowland","doi":"10.1163/187847612X646253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most dramatic physiological example of multisensory integration is response enhancement, where the integration of concordant signals across multiple sensory modalities leads to a larger and more reliable response. In the model system of the superior colliculus, the largest enhancements (often greater than the predicted sum) are observed when the individual signals being combined are weak. This principle conforms to expectations based on signal detection theory, and also as expected, enhancement is not uniform throughout any response. Typically it is greatest near its onset, when the unisensory inputs are at their weakest (Initial Response Enhancement, see Rowland et al., 2007; Rowland and Stein, 2008). Despite the general accuracy of this heuristic, however, there is a substantial amount of variance in the degree of observed enhancement at all levels of responsiveness. This observation appears to violate standard Bayesian predictions that are based on overall response magnitude. Aside from statistical noise, a possible explanation is that individual neurons in the dataset are calibrated to different ‘computational modes’. An alternative hypothesis is that the amount of enhancement is influenced greatly by response properties other than magnitude, specifically, the temporal profile of the response. The present analysis advances the latter hypothesis. We present a mechanistic framework that explains these findings and extends the standard Bayesian approach to generate an accurate prediction for the multisensory response profile given known unisensory response profiles. These predictions offer a ‘null hypothesis’ that can be used to quantify the circumstances and timing of anomalies in the integrative processes in different experimental conditions; for example, when it is developing under different conditions, or when it is disrupted by experimental or surgical intervention at any stage of life.","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646253","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting multisensory enhancement in neuronal responses\",\"authors\":\"B. Rowland\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/187847612X646253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most dramatic physiological example of multisensory integration is response enhancement, where the integration of concordant signals across multiple sensory modalities leads to a larger and more reliable response. In the model system of the superior colliculus, the largest enhancements (often greater than the predicted sum) are observed when the individual signals being combined are weak. This principle conforms to expectations based on signal detection theory, and also as expected, enhancement is not uniform throughout any response. Typically it is greatest near its onset, when the unisensory inputs are at their weakest (Initial Response Enhancement, see Rowland et al., 2007; Rowland and Stein, 2008). Despite the general accuracy of this heuristic, however, there is a substantial amount of variance in the degree of observed enhancement at all levels of responsiveness. This observation appears to violate standard Bayesian predictions that are based on overall response magnitude. Aside from statistical noise, a possible explanation is that individual neurons in the dataset are calibrated to different ‘computational modes’. An alternative hypothesis is that the amount of enhancement is influenced greatly by response properties other than magnitude, specifically, the temporal profile of the response. The present analysis advances the latter hypothesis. We present a mechanistic framework that explains these findings and extends the standard Bayesian approach to generate an accurate prediction for the multisensory response profile given known unisensory response profiles. These predictions offer a ‘null hypothesis’ that can be used to quantify the circumstances and timing of anomalies in the integrative processes in different experimental conditions; for example, when it is developing under different conditions, or when it is disrupted by experimental or surgical intervention at any stage of life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646253\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多感觉整合最引人注目的生理例子是反应增强,其中跨多种感觉模式的一致信号整合导致更大更可靠的反应。在上丘模型系统中,当单个信号组合较弱时,观察到最大的增强(通常大于预测的总和)。这一原理符合基于信号检测理论的预期,也正如预期的那样,增强在任何响应中都不是均匀的。通常情况下,当单感觉输入在其最弱的时候,它在开始时是最大的(初始响应增强,见Rowland等人,2007;罗兰和斯坦,2008)。尽管这种启发式的一般准确性,然而,在所有反应水平上观察到的增强程度存在大量差异。这一观察结果似乎违反了基于总体响应幅度的标准贝叶斯预测。除了统计噪声之外,一个可能的解释是数据集中的单个神经元被校准为不同的“计算模式”。另一种假设是,增强的数量在很大程度上受响应特性的影响,而不是量级,特别是响应的时间分布。本文的分析提出了后一种假设。我们提出了一个解释这些发现的机制框架,并扩展了标准贝叶斯方法,以在已知的多感觉反应概况下对多感觉反应概况进行准确预测。这些预测提供了一个“零假设”,可用于量化不同实验条件下综合过程中异常的情况和时间;例如,当它在不同的条件下发展时,或者当它在生命的任何阶段被实验或手术干预打断时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting multisensory enhancement in neuronal responses
The most dramatic physiological example of multisensory integration is response enhancement, where the integration of concordant signals across multiple sensory modalities leads to a larger and more reliable response. In the model system of the superior colliculus, the largest enhancements (often greater than the predicted sum) are observed when the individual signals being combined are weak. This principle conforms to expectations based on signal detection theory, and also as expected, enhancement is not uniform throughout any response. Typically it is greatest near its onset, when the unisensory inputs are at their weakest (Initial Response Enhancement, see Rowland et al., 2007; Rowland and Stein, 2008). Despite the general accuracy of this heuristic, however, there is a substantial amount of variance in the degree of observed enhancement at all levels of responsiveness. This observation appears to violate standard Bayesian predictions that are based on overall response magnitude. Aside from statistical noise, a possible explanation is that individual neurons in the dataset are calibrated to different ‘computational modes’. An alternative hypothesis is that the amount of enhancement is influenced greatly by response properties other than magnitude, specifically, the temporal profile of the response. The present analysis advances the latter hypothesis. We present a mechanistic framework that explains these findings and extends the standard Bayesian approach to generate an accurate prediction for the multisensory response profile given known unisensory response profiles. These predictions offer a ‘null hypothesis’ that can be used to quantify the circumstances and timing of anomalies in the integrative processes in different experimental conditions; for example, when it is developing under different conditions, or when it is disrupted by experimental or surgical intervention at any stage of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seeing and Perceiving
Seeing and Perceiving BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chapter ten. Color Vision Chapter six. Brightness Constancy Chapter One. Our Idea of the Physical World Chapter nine. Optometrists, Ophthalmologists, Opticians: What They Do Chapter seven. Why the Rate of Unbleaching is Important
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1