老年人站立时保持平衡是否与视听整合效率低下有关?

J. Stapleton, E. Doheny, A. Setti, C. Cunningham, L. Crosby, R. Kenny, F. Newell
{"title":"老年人站立时保持平衡是否与视听整合效率低下有关?","authors":"J. Stapleton, E. Doheny, A. Setti, C. Cunningham, L. Crosby, R. Kenny, F. Newell","doi":"10.1163/187847612X646712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has previously been shown that older adults may be less efficient than younger adults at processing multisensory information, and that older adults with a history of falling may be less efficient than a healthy cohort when processing audio–visual stimuli (Setti et al., 2011). We investigated whether body stance has an effect on older adults’ ability to efficiently process multisensory information and also whether being presented with multisensory stimuli while standing may affect an individual’s balance. This experiment was performed by 44 participants, including both fall-prone older adults and a healthy control cohort. We tested their susceptibility to a sound-induced flash illusion (i.e., Shams et al., 2002), during both sitting and standing positions while measuring balance parameters using body-worn sensors. The results suggest that balance control in fall prone-adults was compromised relative to adults with no falls history, and this was particularly evident whilst they were presented with the auditory-flash illusion but not the non-illusory condition. Also, when the temporal window of the stimulus onset asynchrony was narrow (70 ms) fall-prone adults were more susceptible to the illusion during the standing position compared with their performance while seated, while the performance of older adults with no history of falling was unaffected by a change in position. These results suggest a link between efficient multisensory integration and balance control and have implications for interventions when fall-prone adults encounter complex multisensory information in their environment.","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":"1 1","pages":"50-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646712","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is maintaining balance during standing associated with inefficient audio–visual integration in older adults?\",\"authors\":\"J. Stapleton, E. Doheny, A. Setti, C. Cunningham, L. Crosby, R. Kenny, F. Newell\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/187847612X646712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has previously been shown that older adults may be less efficient than younger adults at processing multisensory information, and that older adults with a history of falling may be less efficient than a healthy cohort when processing audio–visual stimuli (Setti et al., 2011). We investigated whether body stance has an effect on older adults’ ability to efficiently process multisensory information and also whether being presented with multisensory stimuli while standing may affect an individual’s balance. This experiment was performed by 44 participants, including both fall-prone older adults and a healthy control cohort. We tested their susceptibility to a sound-induced flash illusion (i.e., Shams et al., 2002), during both sitting and standing positions while measuring balance parameters using body-worn sensors. The results suggest that balance control in fall prone-adults was compromised relative to adults with no falls history, and this was particularly evident whilst they were presented with the auditory-flash illusion but not the non-illusory condition. Also, when the temporal window of the stimulus onset asynchrony was narrow (70 ms) fall-prone adults were more susceptible to the illusion during the standing position compared with their performance while seated, while the performance of older adults with no history of falling was unaffected by a change in position. These results suggest a link between efficient multisensory integration and balance control and have implications for interventions when fall-prone adults encounter complex multisensory information in their environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"50-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646712\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,老年人处理多感官信息的效率可能低于年轻人,有跌倒史的老年人处理视听刺激的效率可能低于健康人群(Setti et al., 2011)。我们研究了身体姿势是否对老年人有效处理多感官信息的能力有影响,以及站立时受到多感官刺激是否会影响个人的平衡。这项实验由44名参与者进行,包括易跌倒的老年人和健康对照队列。我们测试了他们在坐着和站着时对声音引起的闪光错觉的敏感性(即Shams等人,2002),同时使用穿戴式传感器测量平衡参数。结果表明,与没有跌倒史的成年人相比,有跌倒倾向的成年人的平衡控制能力受到损害,这在他们出现幻听而非幻听的情况下尤为明显。此外,当刺激开始的时间窗口较窄(70 ms)时,跌倒倾向的成年人在站立时比坐着时更容易受到错觉的影响,而没有跌倒史的老年人的表现则不受位置变化的影响。这些结果表明,有效的多感官整合与平衡控制之间存在联系,并对易跌倒的成年人在其环境中遇到复杂的多感官信息时进行干预具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is maintaining balance during standing associated with inefficient audio–visual integration in older adults?
It has previously been shown that older adults may be less efficient than younger adults at processing multisensory information, and that older adults with a history of falling may be less efficient than a healthy cohort when processing audio–visual stimuli (Setti et al., 2011). We investigated whether body stance has an effect on older adults’ ability to efficiently process multisensory information and also whether being presented with multisensory stimuli while standing may affect an individual’s balance. This experiment was performed by 44 participants, including both fall-prone older adults and a healthy control cohort. We tested their susceptibility to a sound-induced flash illusion (i.e., Shams et al., 2002), during both sitting and standing positions while measuring balance parameters using body-worn sensors. The results suggest that balance control in fall prone-adults was compromised relative to adults with no falls history, and this was particularly evident whilst they were presented with the auditory-flash illusion but not the non-illusory condition. Also, when the temporal window of the stimulus onset asynchrony was narrow (70 ms) fall-prone adults were more susceptible to the illusion during the standing position compared with their performance while seated, while the performance of older adults with no history of falling was unaffected by a change in position. These results suggest a link between efficient multisensory integration and balance control and have implications for interventions when fall-prone adults encounter complex multisensory information in their environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seeing and Perceiving
Seeing and Perceiving BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chapter ten. Color Vision Chapter six. Brightness Constancy Chapter One. Our Idea of the Physical World Chapter nine. Optometrists, Ophthalmologists, Opticians: What They Do Chapter seven. Why the Rate of Unbleaching is Important
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1