J. Stapleton, E. Doheny, A. Setti, C. Cunningham, L. Crosby, R. Kenny, F. Newell
{"title":"老年人站立时保持平衡是否与视听整合效率低下有关?","authors":"J. Stapleton, E. Doheny, A. Setti, C. Cunningham, L. Crosby, R. Kenny, F. Newell","doi":"10.1163/187847612X646712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has previously been shown that older adults may be less efficient than younger adults at processing multisensory information, and that older adults with a history of falling may be less efficient than a healthy cohort when processing audio–visual stimuli (Setti et al., 2011). We investigated whether body stance has an effect on older adults’ ability to efficiently process multisensory information and also whether being presented with multisensory stimuli while standing may affect an individual’s balance. This experiment was performed by 44 participants, including both fall-prone older adults and a healthy control cohort. We tested their susceptibility to a sound-induced flash illusion (i.e., Shams et al., 2002), during both sitting and standing positions while measuring balance parameters using body-worn sensors. The results suggest that balance control in fall prone-adults was compromised relative to adults with no falls history, and this was particularly evident whilst they were presented with the auditory-flash illusion but not the non-illusory condition. Also, when the temporal window of the stimulus onset asynchrony was narrow (70 ms) fall-prone adults were more susceptible to the illusion during the standing position compared with their performance while seated, while the performance of older adults with no history of falling was unaffected by a change in position. These results suggest a link between efficient multisensory integration and balance control and have implications for interventions when fall-prone adults encounter complex multisensory information in their environment.","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":"1 1","pages":"50-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646712","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is maintaining balance during standing associated with inefficient audio–visual integration in older adults?\",\"authors\":\"J. Stapleton, E. Doheny, A. Setti, C. Cunningham, L. Crosby, R. Kenny, F. Newell\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/187847612X646712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has previously been shown that older adults may be less efficient than younger adults at processing multisensory information, and that older adults with a history of falling may be less efficient than a healthy cohort when processing audio–visual stimuli (Setti et al., 2011). We investigated whether body stance has an effect on older adults’ ability to efficiently process multisensory information and also whether being presented with multisensory stimuli while standing may affect an individual’s balance. This experiment was performed by 44 participants, including both fall-prone older adults and a healthy control cohort. We tested their susceptibility to a sound-induced flash illusion (i.e., Shams et al., 2002), during both sitting and standing positions while measuring balance parameters using body-worn sensors. The results suggest that balance control in fall prone-adults was compromised relative to adults with no falls history, and this was particularly evident whilst they were presented with the auditory-flash illusion but not the non-illusory condition. Also, when the temporal window of the stimulus onset asynchrony was narrow (70 ms) fall-prone adults were more susceptible to the illusion during the standing position compared with their performance while seated, while the performance of older adults with no history of falling was unaffected by a change in position. These results suggest a link between efficient multisensory integration and balance control and have implications for interventions when fall-prone adults encounter complex multisensory information in their environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"50-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646712\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
先前的研究表明,老年人处理多感官信息的效率可能低于年轻人,有跌倒史的老年人处理视听刺激的效率可能低于健康人群(Setti et al., 2011)。我们研究了身体姿势是否对老年人有效处理多感官信息的能力有影响,以及站立时受到多感官刺激是否会影响个人的平衡。这项实验由44名参与者进行,包括易跌倒的老年人和健康对照队列。我们测试了他们在坐着和站着时对声音引起的闪光错觉的敏感性(即Shams等人,2002),同时使用穿戴式传感器测量平衡参数。结果表明,与没有跌倒史的成年人相比,有跌倒倾向的成年人的平衡控制能力受到损害,这在他们出现幻听而非幻听的情况下尤为明显。此外,当刺激开始的时间窗口较窄(70 ms)时,跌倒倾向的成年人在站立时比坐着时更容易受到错觉的影响,而没有跌倒史的老年人的表现则不受位置变化的影响。这些结果表明,有效的多感官整合与平衡控制之间存在联系,并对易跌倒的成年人在其环境中遇到复杂的多感官信息时进行干预具有启示意义。
Is maintaining balance during standing associated with inefficient audio–visual integration in older adults?
It has previously been shown that older adults may be less efficient than younger adults at processing multisensory information, and that older adults with a history of falling may be less efficient than a healthy cohort when processing audio–visual stimuli (Setti et al., 2011). We investigated whether body stance has an effect on older adults’ ability to efficiently process multisensory information and also whether being presented with multisensory stimuli while standing may affect an individual’s balance. This experiment was performed by 44 participants, including both fall-prone older adults and a healthy control cohort. We tested their susceptibility to a sound-induced flash illusion (i.e., Shams et al., 2002), during both sitting and standing positions while measuring balance parameters using body-worn sensors. The results suggest that balance control in fall prone-adults was compromised relative to adults with no falls history, and this was particularly evident whilst they were presented with the auditory-flash illusion but not the non-illusory condition. Also, when the temporal window of the stimulus onset asynchrony was narrow (70 ms) fall-prone adults were more susceptible to the illusion during the standing position compared with their performance while seated, while the performance of older adults with no history of falling was unaffected by a change in position. These results suggest a link between efficient multisensory integration and balance control and have implications for interventions when fall-prone adults encounter complex multisensory information in their environment.