赫拉克里翁的托勒密八世埃弗格图斯二世石碑

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.1177/030751331109700136
Martina Minas-Nerpel
{"title":"赫拉克里翁的托勒密八世埃弗格图斯二世石碑","authors":"Martina Minas-Nerpel","doi":"10.1177/030751331109700136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this important book, Christophe Thiers presents the monumental bilingual stela (hieroglyphic egyptian and Greek) found in 2001 at the underwater site of Herakleion-Thonis off the Mediterranean coast of egypt near Canopus. The text and commentary of what is the longest surviving hieroglyphic inscription on a stela from the Ptolemaic period constitute the heart of this volume. Additional short interpretative essays put the document in its historical, religious, and political context during the reign of Ptolemy vIII with his two wives, Cleopatra II and Cleopatra III. The study begins with a brief introduction by Franck Goddio, summarising the discovery and the excavation context of the gigantic stela. Luc Tamborero then presents the purely technical data concerning the once monolithic gneiss stela, which is 617 cm high, 314 cm wide, and up to 38 cm deep, and broken into numerous parts. Altogether, seventeen fragments of the stela have been discovered, weighing around seventeen tons. Figure 4 on p. xii, and plate 1, present the re-assembled fragments. The lowest part of the stela, about 115–120 cm long, was intentionally left blank as it was embedded in the ground. Several parts of the monument are still missing, mainly from the lunette and the middle of the hieroglyphic text, but also from the uninscribed lower part. In addition, due to erosion underwater, the inscribed face is now quite deteriorated, so that the beginning of every hieroglyphic line has been lost. Of the Greek inscription, which followed the egyptian one, only a few letters remain. According to Goddio (p. xv) the stela had not been reused, but tumbled down from its original location. After the introduction (pp. ix–xxii), the volume is divided into six chapters, by Christophe Thiers. First is the general presentation of the stela (pp. 1–6), including the dating and the discussion of its lunette; second, the translation of the hieroglyphic text (pp. 7–24); third, the running commentary (pp. 25–37); fourth, the presentation of the almost entirely destroyed Greek inscription (p. 39); fifth, essays of interpretation (pp. 41–9); and sixth, the conclusion (pp. 51–5). Several useful tools are added: chapter seven presents a comprehensive overview of the hieroglyphic inscription and its translation as a running text (pp. 56–66). The volume concludes with extensive indices (Chapter 8, pp. 67–92), a wide-ranging bibliography (Chapter 9, pp. 93–105), as well as several plates of the stela—now in the Maritime Museum Alexandria (SCA 529)—and squeezes of it, which are now kept in Paris. Highly useful is the loose facsimile drawing inserted at the back cover. Altogether, the volume is well produced with fine plates and figures in clear print. The hieroglyphs are for the most part legibly printed, but occasionally they are partly cut, primarily in the notes (for example on pp. 15–16). After a general description, Thiers’ first chapter deals with the dating of the stela (pp. 2–3). Most of the stela’s right half is destroyed, as is the first part of line 1 and with it the year date. This date can be narrowed down, however, since Ptolemy vIII euergetes II is depicted with both his wives, his sister Cleopatra II and his niece Cleopatra III; the stela must therefore have been erected in the years after the wedding of Ptolemy vIII and his younger wife, Cleopatra III, either between 142 1 and 131, or 124 and 116. Following werner Huss, Thiers dates this event to the year 140/141 (p. 2 n. 8). A further indication of the stela’s terminus post quem is the presence of Ptolemy Neos Philopator as a royal ancestor on the left side of the lunette. He can be rather clearly identified by the only surviving word in his inscription (C 5, p. 7), Hnw (neos). Neos Philopator was the son of Ptolemy vIII and Cleopatra II and is first attested in the ruler cult and thus in the titles of the eponymous priests only after the amnesty edict in 118. This dates the stela to the years 118–116. The only problem with Neos Philopator’s identification in the lunette is his position on the right, after the second, third, and fourth Ptolemaic couple, which places him in a position that is — chronologically speaking — rather unexpected. Due to the poor state of preservation, the Ptolemaic ancestors depicted in the lunette are not easy to identify. In addition, no comparable stela with ancestors survives from the reign of Ptolemy vIII, but Thiers presents a nuanced analysis, in which he reconstructs the almost entirely lost right half of the lunette. There, only the last human figure survives more or less complete, easily recognised by her crown: Arsinoe II. She is thus depicted twice on this stela, on either side of the lunette, perhaps due to the fact that she was specifically venerated at Zephyrion, located close to","PeriodicalId":54147,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/030751331109700136","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La stèle de Ptolémée VIII Évergète II à Héracléion\",\"authors\":\"Martina Minas-Nerpel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/030751331109700136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this important book, Christophe Thiers presents the monumental bilingual stela (hieroglyphic egyptian and Greek) found in 2001 at the underwater site of Herakleion-Thonis off the Mediterranean coast of egypt near Canopus. The text and commentary of what is the longest surviving hieroglyphic inscription on a stela from the Ptolemaic period constitute the heart of this volume. Additional short interpretative essays put the document in its historical, religious, and political context during the reign of Ptolemy vIII with his two wives, Cleopatra II and Cleopatra III. The study begins with a brief introduction by Franck Goddio, summarising the discovery and the excavation context of the gigantic stela. Luc Tamborero then presents the purely technical data concerning the once monolithic gneiss stela, which is 617 cm high, 314 cm wide, and up to 38 cm deep, and broken into numerous parts. Altogether, seventeen fragments of the stela have been discovered, weighing around seventeen tons. Figure 4 on p. xii, and plate 1, present the re-assembled fragments. The lowest part of the stela, about 115–120 cm long, was intentionally left blank as it was embedded in the ground. Several parts of the monument are still missing, mainly from the lunette and the middle of the hieroglyphic text, but also from the uninscribed lower part. In addition, due to erosion underwater, the inscribed face is now quite deteriorated, so that the beginning of every hieroglyphic line has been lost. Of the Greek inscription, which followed the egyptian one, only a few letters remain. According to Goddio (p. xv) the stela had not been reused, but tumbled down from its original location. After the introduction (pp. ix–xxii), the volume is divided into six chapters, by Christophe Thiers. First is the general presentation of the stela (pp. 1–6), including the dating and the discussion of its lunette; second, the translation of the hieroglyphic text (pp. 7–24); third, the running commentary (pp. 25–37); fourth, the presentation of the almost entirely destroyed Greek inscription (p. 39); fifth, essays of interpretation (pp. 41–9); and sixth, the conclusion (pp. 51–5). Several useful tools are added: chapter seven presents a comprehensive overview of the hieroglyphic inscription and its translation as a running text (pp. 56–66). The volume concludes with extensive indices (Chapter 8, pp. 67–92), a wide-ranging bibliography (Chapter 9, pp. 93–105), as well as several plates of the stela—now in the Maritime Museum Alexandria (SCA 529)—and squeezes of it, which are now kept in Paris. Highly useful is the loose facsimile drawing inserted at the back cover. Altogether, the volume is well produced with fine plates and figures in clear print. The hieroglyphs are for the most part legibly printed, but occasionally they are partly cut, primarily in the notes (for example on pp. 15–16). After a general description, Thiers’ first chapter deals with the dating of the stela (pp. 2–3). Most of the stela’s right half is destroyed, as is the first part of line 1 and with it the year date. This date can be narrowed down, however, since Ptolemy vIII euergetes II is depicted with both his wives, his sister Cleopatra II and his niece Cleopatra III; the stela must therefore have been erected in the years after the wedding of Ptolemy vIII and his younger wife, Cleopatra III, either between 142 1 and 131, or 124 and 116. Following werner Huss, Thiers dates this event to the year 140/141 (p. 2 n. 8). A further indication of the stela’s terminus post quem is the presence of Ptolemy Neos Philopator as a royal ancestor on the left side of the lunette. He can be rather clearly identified by the only surviving word in his inscription (C 5, p. 7), Hnw (neos). Neos Philopator was the son of Ptolemy vIII and Cleopatra II and is first attested in the ruler cult and thus in the titles of the eponymous priests only after the amnesty edict in 118. This dates the stela to the years 118–116. The only problem with Neos Philopator’s identification in the lunette is his position on the right, after the second, third, and fourth Ptolemaic couple, which places him in a position that is — chronologically speaking — rather unexpected. Due to the poor state of preservation, the Ptolemaic ancestors depicted in the lunette are not easy to identify. In addition, no comparable stela with ancestors survives from the reign of Ptolemy vIII, but Thiers presents a nuanced analysis, in which he reconstructs the almost entirely lost right half of the lunette. There, only the last human figure survives more or less complete, easily recognised by her crown: Arsinoe II. She is thus depicted twice on this stela, on either side of the lunette, perhaps due to the fact that she was specifically venerated at Zephyrion, located close to\",\"PeriodicalId\":54147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/030751331109700136\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/030751331109700136\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/030751331109700136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在这本重要的书中,Christophe Thiers介绍了2001年在靠近Canopus的埃及地中海沿岸的Herakleion-Thonis水下遗址发现的巨大的双语石碑(象形文字埃及和希腊)。从托勒密时期的石碑上现存最长的象形文字铭文的文本和评论构成了本卷的核心。附加的解释性短文将该文件置于托勒密八世及其两个妻子克利奥帕特拉二世和克利奥帕特拉三世统治时期的历史、宗教和政治背景中。研究以frank Goddio的简短介绍开始,总结了巨大石碑的发现和挖掘背景。Luc Tamborero随后介绍了关于这块曾经是单一片麻岩的纯技术数据,这块片麻岩高617厘米,宽314厘米,深38厘米,破碎成许多部分。总共发现了17块石碑碎片,重约17吨。图4 (p. xii)和1号板显示了重新组装的片段。石碑的最低部分,长约115-120厘米,由于嵌入地面,故意留下空白。纪念碑的几个部分仍然缺失,主要来自圆形和中间的象形文字,也来自未铭刻的下部。此外,由于水下的侵蚀,铭刻面现在已经相当恶化,以至于每一个象形文字线的开头都已经丢失了。在埃及文之后的希腊文铭文中,只留下了几个字母。根据Goddio(第15页),石碑没有被重新使用,而是从原来的位置跌落下来。介绍(pp. ix-xxii)后,该卷分为六个章节,由克利斯朵夫梯也尔。首先是石碑的总体介绍(第1-6页),包括年代测定和对其新月形的讨论;第二,象形文字的翻译(第7-24页);第三,连续评论(第25-37页);第四,展示了几乎完全毁坏的希腊铭文(第39页);第五,解读论文(第41-9页);第六,结论部分(第51-5页)。增加了几个有用的工具:第七章介绍了象形文字铭文的全面概述及其翻译作为一个运行文本(第56-66页)。这卷书的结尾有大量的索引(第8章,第67-92页),广泛的参考书目(第9章,第93-105页),以及石碑的几张版画(现在存放在亚历山大海事博物馆(SCA 529))和石碑的挤压版,现在保存在巴黎。非常有用的是在封底插入的松散的传真图纸。总而言之,这本书制作得很好,有精美的盘子和清晰的印刷数字。这些象形文字大部分是清晰地印刷出来的,但偶尔也会有部分被剪掉,主要是在注释中(例如第15-16页)。在一般性描述之后,梯也尔的第一章讨论了石碑的年代(第2-3页)。石碑右半部分的大部分都被毁了,第一行的第一部分和它的年份日期也被毁了。然而,这个日期可以缩小,因为托勒密八世和他的两个妻子,他的妹妹克利奥帕特拉二世和他的侄女克利奥帕特拉三世被描绘成;因此,这座石碑一定是在托勒密八世和他的年轻妻子克利奥帕特拉三世结婚后的几年里竖立起来的,要么是在公元142年至131年之间,要么是在公元124年至116年之间。继werner Huss之后,梯尔将这一事件的日期定为140/141年(第2页,第8页)。铜像左边的王室祖先托勒密·尼奥斯·菲洛普托(Ptolemy Neos Philopator)的出现进一步表明了石碑的最终位置。他可以相当清楚地通过他的碑文(C 5, p. 7)中唯一幸存的单词Hnw (neos)来识别。Neos Philopator是托勒密八世和克利奥帕特拉二世的儿子,在统治者崇拜中首次得到证实,因此在118年的大赦法令之后才在同名牧师的头衔中得到证实。这块石碑的年代可以追溯到118-116年。唯一的问题是他在右边的位置,在第二,第三,第四对托勒密夫妇之后,这把他放在一个位置,从时间上讲,相当出乎意料。由于保存状况不佳,图中描绘的托勒密祖先不容易辨认。此外,在托勒密八世的统治时期,没有一块与祖先相媲美的石碑幸存下来,但梯也尔进行了细致入微的分析,在分析中,他重建了几乎完全丢失的新月形石的右半部分。在那里,只有最后一个人的形象幸存下来,或多或少完整,很容易从她的皇冠上认出:阿西诺二世。因此,她在这块石碑上被描绘了两次,在新月形雕像的两侧,也许是因为她被特别崇敬于西风里翁,位于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La stèle de Ptolémée VIII Évergète II à Héracléion
In this important book, Christophe Thiers presents the monumental bilingual stela (hieroglyphic egyptian and Greek) found in 2001 at the underwater site of Herakleion-Thonis off the Mediterranean coast of egypt near Canopus. The text and commentary of what is the longest surviving hieroglyphic inscription on a stela from the Ptolemaic period constitute the heart of this volume. Additional short interpretative essays put the document in its historical, religious, and political context during the reign of Ptolemy vIII with his two wives, Cleopatra II and Cleopatra III. The study begins with a brief introduction by Franck Goddio, summarising the discovery and the excavation context of the gigantic stela. Luc Tamborero then presents the purely technical data concerning the once monolithic gneiss stela, which is 617 cm high, 314 cm wide, and up to 38 cm deep, and broken into numerous parts. Altogether, seventeen fragments of the stela have been discovered, weighing around seventeen tons. Figure 4 on p. xii, and plate 1, present the re-assembled fragments. The lowest part of the stela, about 115–120 cm long, was intentionally left blank as it was embedded in the ground. Several parts of the monument are still missing, mainly from the lunette and the middle of the hieroglyphic text, but also from the uninscribed lower part. In addition, due to erosion underwater, the inscribed face is now quite deteriorated, so that the beginning of every hieroglyphic line has been lost. Of the Greek inscription, which followed the egyptian one, only a few letters remain. According to Goddio (p. xv) the stela had not been reused, but tumbled down from its original location. After the introduction (pp. ix–xxii), the volume is divided into six chapters, by Christophe Thiers. First is the general presentation of the stela (pp. 1–6), including the dating and the discussion of its lunette; second, the translation of the hieroglyphic text (pp. 7–24); third, the running commentary (pp. 25–37); fourth, the presentation of the almost entirely destroyed Greek inscription (p. 39); fifth, essays of interpretation (pp. 41–9); and sixth, the conclusion (pp. 51–5). Several useful tools are added: chapter seven presents a comprehensive overview of the hieroglyphic inscription and its translation as a running text (pp. 56–66). The volume concludes with extensive indices (Chapter 8, pp. 67–92), a wide-ranging bibliography (Chapter 9, pp. 93–105), as well as several plates of the stela—now in the Maritime Museum Alexandria (SCA 529)—and squeezes of it, which are now kept in Paris. Highly useful is the loose facsimile drawing inserted at the back cover. Altogether, the volume is well produced with fine plates and figures in clear print. The hieroglyphs are for the most part legibly printed, but occasionally they are partly cut, primarily in the notes (for example on pp. 15–16). After a general description, Thiers’ first chapter deals with the dating of the stela (pp. 2–3). Most of the stela’s right half is destroyed, as is the first part of line 1 and with it the year date. This date can be narrowed down, however, since Ptolemy vIII euergetes II is depicted with both his wives, his sister Cleopatra II and his niece Cleopatra III; the stela must therefore have been erected in the years after the wedding of Ptolemy vIII and his younger wife, Cleopatra III, either between 142 1 and 131, or 124 and 116. Following werner Huss, Thiers dates this event to the year 140/141 (p. 2 n. 8). A further indication of the stela’s terminus post quem is the presence of Ptolemy Neos Philopator as a royal ancestor on the left side of the lunette. He can be rather clearly identified by the only surviving word in his inscription (C 5, p. 7), Hnw (neos). Neos Philopator was the son of Ptolemy vIII and Cleopatra II and is first attested in the ruler cult and thus in the titles of the eponymous priests only after the amnesty edict in 118. This dates the stela to the years 118–116. The only problem with Neos Philopator’s identification in the lunette is his position on the right, after the second, third, and fourth Ptolemaic couple, which places him in a position that is — chronologically speaking — rather unexpected. Due to the poor state of preservation, the Ptolemaic ancestors depicted in the lunette are not easy to identify. In addition, no comparable stela with ancestors survives from the reign of Ptolemy vIII, but Thiers presents a nuanced analysis, in which he reconstructs the almost entirely lost right half of the lunette. There, only the last human figure survives more or less complete, easily recognised by her crown: Arsinoe II. She is thus depicted twice on this stela, on either side of the lunette, perhaps due to the fact that she was specifically venerated at Zephyrion, located close to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Ein neuer Textzeuge zu einem neunköpfigen Wesen (pBM EA 10669) The Burials at Amarna Site O45.1 Book Review: Flooded Pasts: UNESCO, Nubia, and the Recolonization of Archaeology The Fragment of a Model of a Tower House from Kom el-Gir, Central Northwestern Delta Igai ‘the Lord of the Oasis’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1