书评:建模人类系统的相互作用:哲学和方法论的考虑,与例子

IF 0.7 Q4 ERGONOMICS Ergonomics in Design Pub Date : 2018-08-17 DOI:10.1177/1064804618795704
J. D. de Winter
{"title":"书评:建模人类系统的相互作用:哲学和方法论的考虑,与例子","authors":"J. D. de Winter","doi":"10.1177/1064804618795704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas B. Sheridan is a well-known scientist who has written a large number of influential articles and books on topics such as teleoperation, automation, and supervisory control. His latest book, Modeling Human– System Interaction: Philosophical and Methodological Considerations, With Examples, has, in his words, “evolved from a professional lifetime of thinking about models and, more generally, thinking about thinking” (p. xi). I have mixed feelings about this book. On the positive side, it contains an accessible overview of classical human–machine system models, including “borrowed engineering models” and qualitative human– automation interaction models. The book has a logical structure, and the core chapters are devoted to the four human information-processing stages (acquiring information, analyzing the information, deciding on action, and implementing and evaluating the action). The models are described in a dense, no-nonsense style. For example, chapter 8, “Implementing and Evaluating the Action,” describes Hick’s law and information theory, Fitts’s law of human movement, open-loop versus closed-loop manual control, McRuer’s crossover model, time delays and preview, internal representation, modeling of response times, human error, and Reason’s Swiss cheese model. It is impressive that all these topics are covered in only 10 pages with quite a sparse layout. I believe that Sheridan has been successful in bringing forward the essence of the selected models. If a reader wishes to learn more about topics such as detection theory, preview control, manual control theory, or Kalman filtering, the 30 pages of appendices provide a useful, mathematically oriented addition. The book also contains a good deal of discussion on what models are. For example, in chapter 2, Sheridan introduces a set of criteria that allow one to classify models: applicability to observables, dimensionality, metricity, robustness, social penetration, and conciseness, each of which can be coded from 1 (least) to 3 (most). I find this an interesting taxonomy, as it differs from existing model-appraising techniques (e.g., Jacobs & Grainger, 1994). I also have a few critical remarks to make. First, although it is clear that this book aims to review classical models, the writing appears to be outdated. Sheridan explains in the preface that “the reader may feel that some models are dated and no longer in fashion . . . , though I would maintain that all those included have passed the test of time and continue to have relevance.” But it is still peculiar that, for example, fuzzy logic is described as a “new analytical tool” (p. 48) while Sheridan cites a reference from 1965. I cannot escape the impression that this book is primarily a compilation of well-known models and drawings and that no attention has been devoted to relating to modern technology or to adding up-to-date reflection, insight, or integration. For example, chapter 9, “Human–Automaton Interaction,” contains a figure from 1967 about supervisory control (Ferrell & Sheridan, 1967) and a table with levels of automation from 1978 (Sheridan & Verplank, 1978). A reader cannot have more than respect that Sheridan was much ahead of his time. However, it is not explained that/how these models have passed the test of time and continue to have relevance. For example, no reference is made to (levels of) automated driving, an important topic for many human factors researchers nowadays. It would have been interesting to hear Sheridan’s opinion about the validity and impact of supervisory control in modern times. Admittedly, chapter 11, “Can Cognitive Engineering Modeling Contribute to Modeling Large-Scale Socio-Technical Systems?” does reflect on the bigger picture, such as inequality between rich and poor, privacy, population growth, the Internet, virtual reality, and massive open online courses (MOOCs). However, it does so in a descriptive and dated fashion. For example, a section is devoted to the 1972 report “The Limits to Growth” (Meadows, Meadows, Randers, & Behrens, 1972). Although it is undeniable that this report includes predictions that continue to be relevant, chapter 11 does not offer new data or viewpoints on this matter. Similarly, it is explained that models can now be made available to a broader audience as “MOOCS are now reaching thousands of users worldwide,” “the Internet is currently in the process of making publicly available many sorts of data sets,” and “[virtual reality] technology allows the viewer to be ‘immersed’ in virtual worlds” (p. 126). These are not precise or enlightening observations. A second point of critique is that parts of the book appear to lack depth and rigor. For example, chapter 1 describes how new knowledge is gained and covers topics such as scientific methods of acquiring knowledge, 795704 ERGXXX10.1177/1064804618795704ergonomics in designergonomics in design book-review2018","PeriodicalId":44407,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics in Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1064804618795704","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Modeling Human–System Interaction: Philosophical and Methodological Considerations, With Examples\",\"authors\":\"J. D. de Winter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1064804618795704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas B. Sheridan is a well-known scientist who has written a large number of influential articles and books on topics such as teleoperation, automation, and supervisory control. His latest book, Modeling Human– System Interaction: Philosophical and Methodological Considerations, With Examples, has, in his words, “evolved from a professional lifetime of thinking about models and, more generally, thinking about thinking” (p. xi). I have mixed feelings about this book. On the positive side, it contains an accessible overview of classical human–machine system models, including “borrowed engineering models” and qualitative human– automation interaction models. The book has a logical structure, and the core chapters are devoted to the four human information-processing stages (acquiring information, analyzing the information, deciding on action, and implementing and evaluating the action). The models are described in a dense, no-nonsense style. For example, chapter 8, “Implementing and Evaluating the Action,” describes Hick’s law and information theory, Fitts’s law of human movement, open-loop versus closed-loop manual control, McRuer’s crossover model, time delays and preview, internal representation, modeling of response times, human error, and Reason’s Swiss cheese model. It is impressive that all these topics are covered in only 10 pages with quite a sparse layout. I believe that Sheridan has been successful in bringing forward the essence of the selected models. If a reader wishes to learn more about topics such as detection theory, preview control, manual control theory, or Kalman filtering, the 30 pages of appendices provide a useful, mathematically oriented addition. The book also contains a good deal of discussion on what models are. For example, in chapter 2, Sheridan introduces a set of criteria that allow one to classify models: applicability to observables, dimensionality, metricity, robustness, social penetration, and conciseness, each of which can be coded from 1 (least) to 3 (most). I find this an interesting taxonomy, as it differs from existing model-appraising techniques (e.g., Jacobs & Grainger, 1994). I also have a few critical remarks to make. First, although it is clear that this book aims to review classical models, the writing appears to be outdated. Sheridan explains in the preface that “the reader may feel that some models are dated and no longer in fashion . . . , though I would maintain that all those included have passed the test of time and continue to have relevance.” But it is still peculiar that, for example, fuzzy logic is described as a “new analytical tool” (p. 48) while Sheridan cites a reference from 1965. I cannot escape the impression that this book is primarily a compilation of well-known models and drawings and that no attention has been devoted to relating to modern technology or to adding up-to-date reflection, insight, or integration. For example, chapter 9, “Human–Automaton Interaction,” contains a figure from 1967 about supervisory control (Ferrell & Sheridan, 1967) and a table with levels of automation from 1978 (Sheridan & Verplank, 1978). A reader cannot have more than respect that Sheridan was much ahead of his time. However, it is not explained that/how these models have passed the test of time and continue to have relevance. For example, no reference is made to (levels of) automated driving, an important topic for many human factors researchers nowadays. It would have been interesting to hear Sheridan’s opinion about the validity and impact of supervisory control in modern times. Admittedly, chapter 11, “Can Cognitive Engineering Modeling Contribute to Modeling Large-Scale Socio-Technical Systems?” does reflect on the bigger picture, such as inequality between rich and poor, privacy, population growth, the Internet, virtual reality, and massive open online courses (MOOCs). However, it does so in a descriptive and dated fashion. For example, a section is devoted to the 1972 report “The Limits to Growth” (Meadows, Meadows, Randers, & Behrens, 1972). Although it is undeniable that this report includes predictions that continue to be relevant, chapter 11 does not offer new data or viewpoints on this matter. Similarly, it is explained that models can now be made available to a broader audience as “MOOCS are now reaching thousands of users worldwide,” “the Internet is currently in the process of making publicly available many sorts of data sets,” and “[virtual reality] technology allows the viewer to be ‘immersed’ in virtual worlds” (p. 126). These are not precise or enlightening observations. A second point of critique is that parts of the book appear to lack depth and rigor. For example, chapter 1 describes how new knowledge is gained and covers topics such as scientific methods of acquiring knowledge, 795704 ERGXXX10.1177/1064804618795704ergonomics in designergonomics in design book-review2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":44407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics in Design\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1064804618795704\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics in Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804618795704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics in Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804618795704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Thomas B. Sheridan是一位著名的科学家,他在远程操作、自动化和监督控制等主题上写了大量有影响力的文章和书籍。用他的话说,他的最新著作《人类建模-系统交互:哲学和方法论的考虑,与实例》是“从对模型的思考,更一般地说,对思维的思考的职业生涯中发展而来的”(第xi页)。从积极的方面来看,它包含了经典人机系统模型的可访问概述,包括“借来的工程模型”和定性的人机交互模型。这本书具有逻辑结构,核心章节专门介绍了人类信息处理的四个阶段(获取信息,分析信息,决定行动,实施和评估行动)。这些模型以一种紧凑、严肃的风格进行描述。例如,第8章“执行和评估行动”描述了希克定律和信息论、菲茨人类运动定律、开环与闭环手动控制、麦克鲁尔的交叉模型、时间延迟和预览、内部表示、响应时间建模、人为错误和Reason的瑞士奶酪模型。令人印象深刻的是,所有这些主题都涵盖在只有10页,相当稀疏的布局。我相信谢里丹已经成功地提出了所选模型的本质。如果读者希望了解更多的主题,如检测理论,预览控制,手动控制理论,或卡尔曼滤波,30页的附录提供了一个有用的,数学导向的补充。这本书还包含了大量关于什么是模型的讨论。例如,在第2章中,Sheridan介绍了一组允许对模型进行分类的标准:对可观察对象的适用性、维度、度量性、鲁棒性、社会渗透和简洁性,每一个都可以从1(最少)到3(最多)进行编码。我发现这是一个有趣的分类,因为它不同于现有的模型评估技术(例如,Jacobs & Grainger, 1994)。我也有几句批评的话要说。首先,虽然这本书的目的很明显是回顾经典模型,但写作似乎过时了。谢里丹在序言中解释说:“读者可能会觉得有些模特已经过时了,不再流行了……但我认为,所有这些都经过了时间的考验,仍然具有相关性。”但是,它仍然是奇怪的,例如,模糊逻辑被描述为一种“新的分析工具”(第48页),而谢里丹引用了1965年的参考资料。我无法逃避的印象是,这本书主要是一个著名的模型和图纸的汇编,没有注意到有关现代技术或增加最新的反思,洞察力,或整合。例如,第9章“人类与自动机的互动”包含了1967年关于监督控制的图表(Ferrell & Sheridan, 1967)和1978年自动化水平的表格(Sheridan & Verplank, 1978)。读者只能对谢里登远远领先于他的时代表示敬意。然而,它没有解释这些模型是如何通过时间的考验并继续具有相关性的。例如,没有提到自动驾驶(水平),这是当今许多人为因素研究人员的重要话题。如果能听听谢里登对现代监督控制的有效性和影响的看法,那将是一件有趣的事情。不可否认,第11章“认知工程建模是否有助于大规模社会技术系统的建模?”确实反映了更大的图景,比如贫富差距、隐私、人口增长、互联网、虚拟现实和大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)。然而,它是以描述性和过时的方式这样做的。例如,有一节专门介绍了1972年的报告“增长的极限”(Meadows, Meadows, Randers, & Behrens, 1972)。虽然不可否认的是,这份报告包括了一些仍然相关的预测,但第11章并没有提供关于这个问题的新数据或观点。同样,它解释说,模型现在可以提供给更广泛的受众,因为“mooc现在已经覆盖了全世界成千上万的用户”,“互联网目前正在使许多类型的数据集公开可用”,以及“[虚拟现实]技术允许观众‘沉浸’在虚拟世界中”(第126页)。这些都不是精确的或启发性的观察。第二点批评是,这本书的某些部分似乎缺乏深度和严谨性。例如,第1章描述了如何获得新知识,并涵盖了诸如获取知识的科学方法等主题,795704 ergxxx10.1177 /1064804618795704设计中的人体工程学设计书评2018
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Modeling Human–System Interaction: Philosophical and Methodological Considerations, With Examples
Thomas B. Sheridan is a well-known scientist who has written a large number of influential articles and books on topics such as teleoperation, automation, and supervisory control. His latest book, Modeling Human– System Interaction: Philosophical and Methodological Considerations, With Examples, has, in his words, “evolved from a professional lifetime of thinking about models and, more generally, thinking about thinking” (p. xi). I have mixed feelings about this book. On the positive side, it contains an accessible overview of classical human–machine system models, including “borrowed engineering models” and qualitative human– automation interaction models. The book has a logical structure, and the core chapters are devoted to the four human information-processing stages (acquiring information, analyzing the information, deciding on action, and implementing and evaluating the action). The models are described in a dense, no-nonsense style. For example, chapter 8, “Implementing and Evaluating the Action,” describes Hick’s law and information theory, Fitts’s law of human movement, open-loop versus closed-loop manual control, McRuer’s crossover model, time delays and preview, internal representation, modeling of response times, human error, and Reason’s Swiss cheese model. It is impressive that all these topics are covered in only 10 pages with quite a sparse layout. I believe that Sheridan has been successful in bringing forward the essence of the selected models. If a reader wishes to learn more about topics such as detection theory, preview control, manual control theory, or Kalman filtering, the 30 pages of appendices provide a useful, mathematically oriented addition. The book also contains a good deal of discussion on what models are. For example, in chapter 2, Sheridan introduces a set of criteria that allow one to classify models: applicability to observables, dimensionality, metricity, robustness, social penetration, and conciseness, each of which can be coded from 1 (least) to 3 (most). I find this an interesting taxonomy, as it differs from existing model-appraising techniques (e.g., Jacobs & Grainger, 1994). I also have a few critical remarks to make. First, although it is clear that this book aims to review classical models, the writing appears to be outdated. Sheridan explains in the preface that “the reader may feel that some models are dated and no longer in fashion . . . , though I would maintain that all those included have passed the test of time and continue to have relevance.” But it is still peculiar that, for example, fuzzy logic is described as a “new analytical tool” (p. 48) while Sheridan cites a reference from 1965. I cannot escape the impression that this book is primarily a compilation of well-known models and drawings and that no attention has been devoted to relating to modern technology or to adding up-to-date reflection, insight, or integration. For example, chapter 9, “Human–Automaton Interaction,” contains a figure from 1967 about supervisory control (Ferrell & Sheridan, 1967) and a table with levels of automation from 1978 (Sheridan & Verplank, 1978). A reader cannot have more than respect that Sheridan was much ahead of his time. However, it is not explained that/how these models have passed the test of time and continue to have relevance. For example, no reference is made to (levels of) automated driving, an important topic for many human factors researchers nowadays. It would have been interesting to hear Sheridan’s opinion about the validity and impact of supervisory control in modern times. Admittedly, chapter 11, “Can Cognitive Engineering Modeling Contribute to Modeling Large-Scale Socio-Technical Systems?” does reflect on the bigger picture, such as inequality between rich and poor, privacy, population growth, the Internet, virtual reality, and massive open online courses (MOOCs). However, it does so in a descriptive and dated fashion. For example, a section is devoted to the 1972 report “The Limits to Growth” (Meadows, Meadows, Randers, & Behrens, 1972). Although it is undeniable that this report includes predictions that continue to be relevant, chapter 11 does not offer new data or viewpoints on this matter. Similarly, it is explained that models can now be made available to a broader audience as “MOOCS are now reaching thousands of users worldwide,” “the Internet is currently in the process of making publicly available many sorts of data sets,” and “[virtual reality] technology allows the viewer to be ‘immersed’ in virtual worlds” (p. 126). These are not precise or enlightening observations. A second point of critique is that parts of the book appear to lack depth and rigor. For example, chapter 1 describes how new knowledge is gained and covers topics such as scientific methods of acquiring knowledge, 795704 ERGXXX10.1177/1064804618795704ergonomics in designergonomics in design book-review2018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics in Design
Ergonomics in Design ERGONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications is intended to serve the needs of practicing human factors/ergonomics professionals who are concerned with the usability of products, systems, tools, and environments. It provides up-to-date demonstrations of the importance of HF/E principles in design and implementation. Articles, case studies, anecdotes, debates, and interviews focus on the way in which HF/E research and methods are applied in the design, development, prototyping, test and evaluation, training, and manufacturing processes of a product or system.
期刊最新文献
Commentary From the Editor-in-Chief Real-World Stairways: Need for Visual Contrast Enhancements to Mitigate the Hazards of Variable Step Geometry Anthropometric Fit Test Methods: Three Case Studies In the news... Designing for Learnability: Improvement Through Layered Interfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1