{"title":"反种族主义、民族国家与当代英国黑人文学","authors":"Dave Gunning","doi":"10.1177/0021989404044734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I am concerned to address some of the ways in which contemporary black British literature has been located in relation to a national framework. I do not want to deny that this literature can be seen to illuminate identities that have their roots in international traditions and global cultural forms. However, I wish to take issue with the apparent reluctance among literary critics in this area to accept the use of the nation as an explanatory tool in analysing these works. It is my contention that an understanding of any material anti-racist politics articulated in these texts can only be achieved when placed within the context of the actual discursive practices of the state and civil society of the nation at any given time. I intend to address some of the problems attached to the increasingly popular analytic model of the transnational. While this model may be seen to provide a way of discussing the specificity of individual nations in a way that other conceptions of globalization or postcolonialism fail to achieve, in practice one can frequently still detect a failure to assert fully the materiality of the national space to the degree that a viable conception of transnationality would seem to require. To demonstrate the need for an idea of the nation when analysing anti-racism in black writing in Britain, I intend to present a critique of one of the most influential non-national analyses of black identity: Paul Gilroy’s The Black Atlantic. In showing how this model may not be able to explain particular instances of anti-racist discourse, I hope to present a case in which the importance of the nation-state to expressions of anti-racist","PeriodicalId":44714,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE","volume":"39 1","pages":"29 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0021989404044734","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Racism, the Nation-State and Contemporary Black British Literature\",\"authors\":\"Dave Gunning\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0021989404044734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I am concerned to address some of the ways in which contemporary black British literature has been located in relation to a national framework. I do not want to deny that this literature can be seen to illuminate identities that have their roots in international traditions and global cultural forms. However, I wish to take issue with the apparent reluctance among literary critics in this area to accept the use of the nation as an explanatory tool in analysing these works. It is my contention that an understanding of any material anti-racist politics articulated in these texts can only be achieved when placed within the context of the actual discursive practices of the state and civil society of the nation at any given time. I intend to address some of the problems attached to the increasingly popular analytic model of the transnational. While this model may be seen to provide a way of discussing the specificity of individual nations in a way that other conceptions of globalization or postcolonialism fail to achieve, in practice one can frequently still detect a failure to assert fully the materiality of the national space to the degree that a viable conception of transnationality would seem to require. To demonstrate the need for an idea of the nation when analysing anti-racism in black writing in Britain, I intend to present a critique of one of the most influential non-national analyses of black identity: Paul Gilroy’s The Black Atlantic. In showing how this model may not be able to explain particular instances of anti-racist discourse, I hope to present a case in which the importance of the nation-state to expressions of anti-racist\",\"PeriodicalId\":44714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0021989404044734\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989404044734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989404044734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
在这篇论文中,我关注的是当代英国黑人文学与国家框架的关系。我不想否认,这种文学可以被看作是阐释了植根于国际传统和全球文化形式的身份。然而,我想对这一领域的文学评论家明显不愿意接受使用民族作为分析这些作品的解释工具提出质疑。我的观点是,对这些文本中所表达的任何材料的反种族主义政治的理解,只有放在任何特定时间国家和公民社会的实际话语实践的背景下才能实现。我打算讨论一些与日益流行的跨国公司分析模型有关的问题。虽然这一模式可能被视为提供了一种讨论个别国家特殊性的方式,而其他全球化或后殖民主义的概念无法做到这一点,但在实践中,人们仍然可以经常发现,未能充分主张国家空间的物质性,以达到可行的跨国概念似乎需要的程度。为了证明在分析英国黑人作品中的反种族主义时需要一个国家的概念,我打算对保罗·吉尔罗伊(Paul Gilroy)的《黑人大西洋》(the black Atlantic)这一最具影响力的非国家的黑人身份分析之一提出批评。为了说明这个模型可能无法解释反种族主义话语的特定实例,我希望提出一个案例,说明民族国家对反种族主义表达的重要性
Anti-Racism, the Nation-State and Contemporary Black British Literature
In this paper I am concerned to address some of the ways in which contemporary black British literature has been located in relation to a national framework. I do not want to deny that this literature can be seen to illuminate identities that have their roots in international traditions and global cultural forms. However, I wish to take issue with the apparent reluctance among literary critics in this area to accept the use of the nation as an explanatory tool in analysing these works. It is my contention that an understanding of any material anti-racist politics articulated in these texts can only be achieved when placed within the context of the actual discursive practices of the state and civil society of the nation at any given time. I intend to address some of the problems attached to the increasingly popular analytic model of the transnational. While this model may be seen to provide a way of discussing the specificity of individual nations in a way that other conceptions of globalization or postcolonialism fail to achieve, in practice one can frequently still detect a failure to assert fully the materiality of the national space to the degree that a viable conception of transnationality would seem to require. To demonstrate the need for an idea of the nation when analysing anti-racism in black writing in Britain, I intend to present a critique of one of the most influential non-national analyses of black identity: Paul Gilroy’s The Black Atlantic. In showing how this model may not be able to explain particular instances of anti-racist discourse, I hope to present a case in which the importance of the nation-state to expressions of anti-racist
期刊介绍:
"The Journal of Commonwealth Literature has long established itself as an invaluable resource and guide for scholars in the overlapping fields of commonwealth Literature, Postcolonial Literature and New Literatures in English. The journal is an institution, a household word and, most of all, a living, working companion." Edward Baugh The Journal of Commonwealth Literature is internationally recognized as the leading critical and bibliographic forum in the field of Commonwealth and postcolonial literatures. It provides an essential, peer-reveiwed, reference tool for scholars, researchers, and information scientists. Three of the four issues each year bring together the latest critical comment on all aspects of ‘Commonwealth’ and postcolonial literature and related areas, such as postcolonial theory, translation studies, and colonial discourse. The fourth issue provides a comprehensive bibliography of publications in the field