{"title":"形状与阴影:莫妮卡·阿里砖巷的移民面纱","authors":"J. Hiddleston","doi":"10.1177/0021989405050665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monica Ali’s Brick Lane burst into the public domain in the summer of 2003, generating both enthusiastic critical acclaim and defensive anger. Praised by some for providing a much needed and so far unprecedented portrait of the Bangladeshi community of London’s East End, the novel also irritated some members of that community, who saw its portrayal of their lives as inaccurate and derogatory. While some readers congratulated Ali for pulling back the curtains of the residences of Tower Hamlets and depicting the injustices and dissatisfactions suffered by their inhabitants, others were shocked by her boldness and offended by what they considered to be a gross misrepresentation of Bengali culture in London. Included in Granta’s list of best young authors, nominated for the US Award of the National Book Critics’ Circle, and short-listed for the Booker Prize, Ali at the same time received a letter from the Greater Sylhet Development and Welfare council condemning her depiction of Bangladeshis as backward and uneducated. This divided response to Ali’s work reveals not only differences in readerly expectations and preconceptions regarding the community in hand, but also a mire of uncertainties concerning the nature of literary representation, in this particular case and more generally. This article will try to elucidate these uncertainties and establish more clearly the nature and implications of Ali’s fictional experimentation in Brick Lane. Both the responses cited above seem still to rely on some notion of literature as realist documentation, but an alternative approach might focus instead on the difficulties of such a construction, on the deceptive effects of the text’s rhetoric. The Shapes and Shadows","PeriodicalId":44714,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0021989405050665","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shapes and Shadows: (Un)veiling the Immigrant in Monica Ali’s Brick Lane\",\"authors\":\"J. Hiddleston\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0021989405050665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Monica Ali’s Brick Lane burst into the public domain in the summer of 2003, generating both enthusiastic critical acclaim and defensive anger. Praised by some for providing a much needed and so far unprecedented portrait of the Bangladeshi community of London’s East End, the novel also irritated some members of that community, who saw its portrayal of their lives as inaccurate and derogatory. While some readers congratulated Ali for pulling back the curtains of the residences of Tower Hamlets and depicting the injustices and dissatisfactions suffered by their inhabitants, others were shocked by her boldness and offended by what they considered to be a gross misrepresentation of Bengali culture in London. Included in Granta’s list of best young authors, nominated for the US Award of the National Book Critics’ Circle, and short-listed for the Booker Prize, Ali at the same time received a letter from the Greater Sylhet Development and Welfare council condemning her depiction of Bangladeshis as backward and uneducated. This divided response to Ali’s work reveals not only differences in readerly expectations and preconceptions regarding the community in hand, but also a mire of uncertainties concerning the nature of literary representation, in this particular case and more generally. This article will try to elucidate these uncertainties and establish more clearly the nature and implications of Ali’s fictional experimentation in Brick Lane. Both the responses cited above seem still to rely on some notion of literature as realist documentation, but an alternative approach might focus instead on the difficulties of such a construction, on the deceptive effects of the text’s rhetoric. The Shapes and Shadows\",\"PeriodicalId\":44714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0021989405050665\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989405050665\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989405050665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shapes and Shadows: (Un)veiling the Immigrant in Monica Ali’s Brick Lane
Monica Ali’s Brick Lane burst into the public domain in the summer of 2003, generating both enthusiastic critical acclaim and defensive anger. Praised by some for providing a much needed and so far unprecedented portrait of the Bangladeshi community of London’s East End, the novel also irritated some members of that community, who saw its portrayal of their lives as inaccurate and derogatory. While some readers congratulated Ali for pulling back the curtains of the residences of Tower Hamlets and depicting the injustices and dissatisfactions suffered by their inhabitants, others were shocked by her boldness and offended by what they considered to be a gross misrepresentation of Bengali culture in London. Included in Granta’s list of best young authors, nominated for the US Award of the National Book Critics’ Circle, and short-listed for the Booker Prize, Ali at the same time received a letter from the Greater Sylhet Development and Welfare council condemning her depiction of Bangladeshis as backward and uneducated. This divided response to Ali’s work reveals not only differences in readerly expectations and preconceptions regarding the community in hand, but also a mire of uncertainties concerning the nature of literary representation, in this particular case and more generally. This article will try to elucidate these uncertainties and establish more clearly the nature and implications of Ali’s fictional experimentation in Brick Lane. Both the responses cited above seem still to rely on some notion of literature as realist documentation, but an alternative approach might focus instead on the difficulties of such a construction, on the deceptive effects of the text’s rhetoric. The Shapes and Shadows
期刊介绍:
"The Journal of Commonwealth Literature has long established itself as an invaluable resource and guide for scholars in the overlapping fields of commonwealth Literature, Postcolonial Literature and New Literatures in English. The journal is an institution, a household word and, most of all, a living, working companion." Edward Baugh The Journal of Commonwealth Literature is internationally recognized as the leading critical and bibliographic forum in the field of Commonwealth and postcolonial literatures. It provides an essential, peer-reveiwed, reference tool for scholars, researchers, and information scientists. Three of the four issues each year bring together the latest critical comment on all aspects of ‘Commonwealth’ and postcolonial literature and related areas, such as postcolonial theory, translation studies, and colonial discourse. The fourth issue provides a comprehensive bibliography of publications in the field