质量审查-要求工作人员和患者告知曼彻斯特中部的质量战略

S. Corcoran
{"title":"质量审查-要求工作人员和患者告知曼彻斯特中部的质量战略","authors":"S. Corcoran","doi":"10.1177/1356262215572264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, like many Trusts, asked itself a number of searching questions in the wake of the reports into appalling standards of care in a number of UK care settings between 2006 and 2009. In order to seek assurance on the quality of care being provided and to be very clear about where improvements were needed, the Board of Directors commissioned a comprehensive peer review into standards of care provided. The resulting exercise involved over 200 staff being trained in review techniques and participating in a comprehensive Trust wide quality improvement programme. The output of this exercise was a detailed plan to improve quality of care, increased recognition of excellence, shared learning across multiple specialties, and increased staff engagement and expertise.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"21 1","pages":"3 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215572264","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The quality review – asking staff and patients to inform quality strategy in Central Manchester\",\"authors\":\"S. Corcoran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262215572264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, like many Trusts, asked itself a number of searching questions in the wake of the reports into appalling standards of care in a number of UK care settings between 2006 and 2009. In order to seek assurance on the quality of care being provided and to be very clear about where improvements were needed, the Board of Directors commissioned a comprehensive peer review into standards of care provided. The resulting exercise involved over 200 staff being trained in review techniques and participating in a comprehensive Trust wide quality improvement programme. The output of this exercise was a detailed plan to improve quality of care, increased recognition of excellence, shared learning across multiple specialties, and increased staff engagement and expertise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215572264\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215572264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215572264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中央曼彻斯特大学医院NHS基金会信托基金,像许多信托基金一样,在2006年至2009年期间,在一些英国护理机构骇人听闻的护理标准的报告之后,问了自己一些探索性的问题。为了确保所提供的护理的质量,并非常清楚需要改进的地方,董事会委托对所提供的护理标准进行全面的同行审查。结果,200多名工作人员接受了审查技巧方面的培训,并参加了一项全面的全信托基金质量改进方案。这项工作的结果是一个详细的计划,以提高护理质量,增加对卓越的认可,跨多个专业共享学习,并提高员工的敬业度和专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The quality review – asking staff and patients to inform quality strategy in Central Manchester
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, like many Trusts, asked itself a number of searching questions in the wake of the reports into appalling standards of care in a number of UK care settings between 2006 and 2009. In order to seek assurance on the quality of care being provided and to be very clear about where improvements were needed, the Board of Directors commissioned a comprehensive peer review into standards of care provided. The resulting exercise involved over 200 staff being trained in review techniques and participating in a comprehensive Trust wide quality improvement programme. The output of this exercise was a detailed plan to improve quality of care, increased recognition of excellence, shared learning across multiple specialties, and increased staff engagement and expertise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1