第二受害者索赔失败:怀尔德诉绍森德大学医院NHS基金会信托

Sejal Mehta
{"title":"第二受害者索赔失败:怀尔德诉绍森德大学医院NHS基金会信托","authors":"Sejal Mehta","doi":"10.1177/1356262215584706B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ably an equitable ruling because the claimant has actually lost nothing and suffered nothing as a consequence of the technical breach. The position is, however, very different if the claimant would not have been detained but for the error. In such cases, it is entirely appropriate that damages will be substantial because the claimant will have lost liberty and possibly suffered financially as a consequence of being unlawfully detained.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"21 1","pages":"16 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215584706B","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary victim claim fails: Wild v Southend University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust\",\"authors\":\"Sejal Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262215584706B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ably an equitable ruling because the claimant has actually lost nothing and suffered nothing as a consequence of the technical breach. The position is, however, very different if the claimant would not have been detained but for the error. In such cases, it is entirely appropriate that damages will be substantial because the claimant will have lost liberty and possibly suffered financially as a consequence of being unlawfully detained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215584706B\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215584706B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215584706B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实际上,这是一项公平的裁决,因为索赔人实际上并没有因为技术违约而遭受任何损失和损失。但是,如果索赔人不是因为这个错误而被拘留的话,情况就大不相同了。在这种情况下,赔偿数额很大是完全适当的,因为索赔人将因被非法拘留而失去自由,并可能遭受经济损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secondary victim claim fails: Wild v Southend University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
ably an equitable ruling because the claimant has actually lost nothing and suffered nothing as a consequence of the technical breach. The position is, however, very different if the claimant would not have been detained but for the error. In such cases, it is entirely appropriate that damages will be substantial because the claimant will have lost liberty and possibly suffered financially as a consequence of being unlawfully detained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1