研究中学习:一个校企合作项目中教师学习的成果与行动

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ECNU Review of Education Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/20965311221109278
Ge Wei (魏戈), Chi-yang Chung (钟启旸)
{"title":"研究中学习:一个校企合作项目中教师学习的成果与行动","authors":"Ge Wei (魏戈), Chi-yang Chung (钟启旸)","doi":"10.1177/20965311221109278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study explores the achievements and process of a group of Chinese primary school teachers learning from a research-based school–university collaborative project. Design/Approach/Methods We used qualitative methods to construct our research design, collecting data through participatory observations of weekly meetings, teacher interviews, and participants’ reflective journals. Both thematic analysis and discursive analysis were employed as strategies to scrutinize the data. Findings We categorize teachers’ learning into five achievements: outcome, processual, democratic, catalytic, and dialogic achievement. A further examination highlights seven successive learning actions composing an implicit mechanism to facilitate these achievements: questioning, analyzing, modeling, examining, implementing, reflecting, and consolidating. Originality/Value Through this longitudinal study, we more comprehensively record details about teachers’ learning as they conduct their own research. Although school–university heterogeneous collaboration has potential conflicts, teachers can improve their problem-solving and knowledge creation and sharing abilities, promoting a sense of professional accomplishment. These findings also suggest the need to reconsider the authentic process of teacher research, a task equally significant for international educators.","PeriodicalId":33103,"journal":{"name":"ECNU Review of Education","volume":"73 1","pages":"215 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning by Researching: Achievements and Actions of Teacher Learning in a School–University Collaborative Project\",\"authors\":\"Ge Wei (魏戈), Chi-yang Chung (钟启旸)\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20965311221109278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study explores the achievements and process of a group of Chinese primary school teachers learning from a research-based school–university collaborative project. Design/Approach/Methods We used qualitative methods to construct our research design, collecting data through participatory observations of weekly meetings, teacher interviews, and participants’ reflective journals. Both thematic analysis and discursive analysis were employed as strategies to scrutinize the data. Findings We categorize teachers’ learning into five achievements: outcome, processual, democratic, catalytic, and dialogic achievement. A further examination highlights seven successive learning actions composing an implicit mechanism to facilitate these achievements: questioning, analyzing, modeling, examining, implementing, reflecting, and consolidating. Originality/Value Through this longitudinal study, we more comprehensively record details about teachers’ learning as they conduct their own research. Although school–university heterogeneous collaboration has potential conflicts, teachers can improve their problem-solving and knowledge creation and sharing abilities, promoting a sense of professional accomplishment. These findings also suggest the need to reconsider the authentic process of teacher research, a task equally significant for international educators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECNU Review of Education\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECNU Review of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221109278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECNU Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221109278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨我国小学教师在研究性校校合作项目中学习的成果与过程。设计/方法/方法我们采用定性方法构建我们的研究设计,通过每周会议的参与性观察、教师访谈和参与者的反思日志收集数据。本文采用主题分析和话语分析两种方法对数据进行分析。我们将教师的学习分为五种成就:结果性成就、过程性成就、民主性成就、催化性成就和对话性成就。进一步的研究强调了七个连续的学习行为,它们构成了促进这些成就的隐性机制:质疑、分析、建模、检查、实施、反思和巩固。通过这项纵向研究,我们更全面地记录了教师在进行自己的研究时的学习细节。虽然校企异质协作存在潜在冲突,但教师可以提高解决问题的能力和知识创造与分享的能力,促进职业成就感。这些发现还表明,需要重新考虑教师研究的真实过程,这对国际教育工作者来说同样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning by Researching: Achievements and Actions of Teacher Learning in a School–University Collaborative Project
Purpose This study explores the achievements and process of a group of Chinese primary school teachers learning from a research-based school–university collaborative project. Design/Approach/Methods We used qualitative methods to construct our research design, collecting data through participatory observations of weekly meetings, teacher interviews, and participants’ reflective journals. Both thematic analysis and discursive analysis were employed as strategies to scrutinize the data. Findings We categorize teachers’ learning into five achievements: outcome, processual, democratic, catalytic, and dialogic achievement. A further examination highlights seven successive learning actions composing an implicit mechanism to facilitate these achievements: questioning, analyzing, modeling, examining, implementing, reflecting, and consolidating. Originality/Value Through this longitudinal study, we more comprehensively record details about teachers’ learning as they conduct their own research. Although school–university heterogeneous collaboration has potential conflicts, teachers can improve their problem-solving and knowledge creation and sharing abilities, promoting a sense of professional accomplishment. These findings also suggest the need to reconsider the authentic process of teacher research, a task equally significant for international educators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ECNU Review of Education
ECNU Review of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Educational Improvement Science: The Art of the Improving Organization Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Young Children: Redeveloping the Five Big Ideas Framework Extending the Comparisons of Shadow Education and Its Nexus With Schooling Toward a High-Quality System: A Critique of Chinese Special Education Policy Development and the Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Quality of Special Education Schools China's Policy Actions to Lead Teacher Development With Evaluation Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1