神话与现实:对澳大利亚工作场所劳资关系调查的回顾

IF 1.5 3区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economic and Labour Relations Review Pub Date : 1991-06-01 DOI:10.1177/103530469100200105

Michael Angwin

{"title":"神话与现实:对澳大利亚工作场所劳资关系调查的回顾","authors":"Michael Angwin","doi":"10.1177/103530469100200105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been little empirical research into enterprise and workplace industrial relations. The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey fills a major void. This paper examines the results of this Survey. It challenges the ‘industrial relations' perspective adopted as well as some of the major conclusions, particularly those relating to industrial relations constraints upon flexibility. The paper also compares the findings with those of the Business Council's Industrial Relations Study Commission.","PeriodicalId":51718,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Labour Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"1991-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/103530469100200105","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myths and Realities: A Review of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey\",\"authors\":\"Michael Angwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/103530469100200105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been little empirical research into enterprise and workplace industrial relations. The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey fills a major void. This paper examines the results of this Survey. It challenges the ‘industrial relations' perspective adopted as well as some of the major conclusions, particularly those relating to industrial relations constraints upon flexibility. The paper also compares the findings with those of the Business Council's Industrial Relations Study Commission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic and Labour Relations Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/103530469100200105\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic and Labour Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/103530469100200105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Labour Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/103530469100200105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

对企业和工作场所劳资关系的实证研究很少。澳大利亚工作场所劳资关系调查填补了一个主要空白。本文对调查结果进行了检验。它对所采用的“劳资关系”观点以及一些主要结论提出了挑战，特别是那些与劳资关系对灵活性的限制有关的结论。该报告还将调查结果与美国商业理事会劳资关系研究委员会的调查结果进行了比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Myths and Realities: A Review of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey

There has been little empirical research into enterprise and workplace industrial relations. The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey fills a major void. This paper examines the results of this Survey. It challenges the ‘industrial relations' perspective adopted as well as some of the major conclusions, particularly those relating to industrial relations constraints upon flexibility. The paper also compares the findings with those of the Business Council's Industrial Relations Study Commission.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economic and Labour Relations Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

8.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Economic & Labour Relations Review is a double-blind, peer-reviewed journal that aims to bring together research in economics and labour relations in a multi-disciplinary approach to policy questions. The journal encourages articles that critically assess dominant orthodoxies, as well as alternative models, thereby facilitating informed debate. The journal particularly encourages articles that adopt a post-Keynesian (heterodox) approach to economics, or that explore rights-, equality- or justice-based approaches to labour relations and social policy.